Post by Rob Caprio on Nov 5, 2020 20:41:27 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Lee_Harvey_Oswald_arrest_card_1963.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) shot and killed President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. They further stated that LHO was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, on October 18, 1939. They would not consider the idea of there being more than one Oswald at all despite numerous sightings that called this conclusion into question.
There is further evidence that reasonably raises the question of whether there was more than one Oswald, and whether the authorities knew about it.
****************************************
Why is there no date of November 22, 1963, or later, on LHO’s United States Marine Corps (USMC) master fingerprint card?
If we go to Commission Exhibit (CE) 635 we will see dates stamped on the reverse side of LHO’s USMC fingerprint card (DD 369) which indicates that the card was accessed at those times. The dates listed are: November 16, 1959; March 1, 1960; December 1?, 1961; February 25, 1962; and August 15, 1963. Two dates are handwritten on the card and they are October 31, 1959 and November 5, 1959.
CE 635: www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0158a.jpg
These dates reflect the times that this card was pulled for comparison purposes, but why don’t we see the date of November 22, 1963, or later on this card? Why wouldn’t the Dallas Police Department (DPD) request this card for comparison purposes? Wouldn’t this be standard procedure? Could the failure to do this suggest that the DPD knew that the man they had in custody was not the same as the one who had been in the USMC?
Furthermore, if we look at the USMC master fingerprint card we will see that LHO’s card is designated with the number “327 925 D”, and if we go to the official DPD fingerprint card made on November 22 we see the same number handwritten at the top left.
CE 630: www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0156a.jpg
Since it is hard to see on this version here is CE 633A which shows it much clearer.
CE 633A: www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0157a.jpg
The usage of the USMC master fingerprint card number confirms that the DPD referenced it for comparison purposes, but they did not record the date on CE 630 as had been done in previous occurrences. Why? Could it be that they did NOT match which would indicate that the LHO in Dallas was not the same one that had joined the USMC?
I don't think that there is a reasonable explaination for this oversight other than the authorities knew something was up in this area. Another possibility is they did pull the USMC fingerprint card and made a comparison only to realize that they weren't the same person. That would explain why they left no date on it to make it look like it wasn't checked. Many researchers have believed that if there was an Oswald switch that it was performed while he was in the USMC.
Because the WC failed to support their version of events with evidence their conclusion cannot be correct, thus, it is sunk.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Lee_Harvey_Oswald_arrest_card_1963.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) shot and killed President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. They further stated that LHO was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, on October 18, 1939. They would not consider the idea of there being more than one Oswald at all despite numerous sightings that called this conclusion into question.
There is further evidence that reasonably raises the question of whether there was more than one Oswald, and whether the authorities knew about it.
****************************************
Why is there no date of November 22, 1963, or later, on LHO’s United States Marine Corps (USMC) master fingerprint card?
If we go to Commission Exhibit (CE) 635 we will see dates stamped on the reverse side of LHO’s USMC fingerprint card (DD 369) which indicates that the card was accessed at those times. The dates listed are: November 16, 1959; March 1, 1960; December 1?, 1961; February 25, 1962; and August 15, 1963. Two dates are handwritten on the card and they are October 31, 1959 and November 5, 1959.
CE 635: www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0158a.jpg
These dates reflect the times that this card was pulled for comparison purposes, but why don’t we see the date of November 22, 1963, or later on this card? Why wouldn’t the Dallas Police Department (DPD) request this card for comparison purposes? Wouldn’t this be standard procedure? Could the failure to do this suggest that the DPD knew that the man they had in custody was not the same as the one who had been in the USMC?
Furthermore, if we look at the USMC master fingerprint card we will see that LHO’s card is designated with the number “327 925 D”, and if we go to the official DPD fingerprint card made on November 22 we see the same number handwritten at the top left.
CE 630: www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0156a.jpg
Since it is hard to see on this version here is CE 633A which shows it much clearer.
CE 633A: www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0157a.jpg
The usage of the USMC master fingerprint card number confirms that the DPD referenced it for comparison purposes, but they did not record the date on CE 630 as had been done in previous occurrences. Why? Could it be that they did NOT match which would indicate that the LHO in Dallas was not the same one that had joined the USMC?
I don't think that there is a reasonable explaination for this oversight other than the authorities knew something was up in this area. Another possibility is they did pull the USMC fingerprint card and made a comparison only to realize that they weren't the same person. That would explain why they left no date on it to make it look like it wasn't checked. Many researchers have believed that if there was an Oswald switch that it was performed while he was in the USMC.
Because the WC failed to support their version of events with evidence their conclusion cannot be correct, thus, it is sunk.