Post by Rob Caprio on Nov 18, 2020 21:21:41 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
www.archives.gov/files/publications/prologue/2017/fall/images/warren-commission.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) assassinated President John F. Kennedy (JFK) all by himself on November 22, 1963. If this is correct, how could so many people have advanced knowledge that it would occur?
How where they able to predict his assassination so accurately?
******************************************
If there were no plans to assassinate JFK prior to November 22, 1963, how did so many people predict accurately that it would happen?
While it is probably true that many public figures receive death threats it doesn’t seem as common for them to have a prediction that they will be killed made. And yet, we have already seen in this series numerous predictions concerning JFK’s demise were made. Another example came from Mrs. Thomas Eckols as she told the FBI that she worked with a Betty Sierad at a telephone answering service in June 1962. The comments attributed to Ms. Sierad are interesting.
Quote on
She stated BETTY SIERAD pretended to be a very hard worker for the Republican Party and very much against President KENNEDY. She stated sometime during June, 1962, while they were working at the switchboard, BETTY SIERAD made the remark that during the fall of 1963, there would be a definite attempt by Congress to impeach President KENNEDY and if they failed, President KENNEDY would be assassinated. (Commission Document (CD) 301, p. 278)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10702#relPageId=287&tab=page
Quote off
Mrs Eckols would tell the FBI that she thought Sierad was “talking through her hat”, but of course her alleged comment came true on November 22. Mrs. Eckols said that Sierad left shortly after this comment and had no idea where she went, but the FBI showed that they could find anyone if they wanted to.
In her discussion with the FBI Sierad would tell them the following.
Quote on
Mrs. SIERAD stated she had never been active in politics…She stated that she had not been adverse to KENNEDY. She stated that she had made the statement to her son that “This is the year that the President would either die in office or would be assassinated.” She stated that she made this statement as a prophecy, and it was not based on any information which was known to her that KENNEDY would be assassinated. (CD 301, p. 279)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10702#relPageId=286&tab=page
Quote off
Sierad’s explanation does not change what Eckols said. Surely Eckols would not have contacted the FBI if Sierad had simply passed on a premonition as she claimed. This discussion occurred about 17 months before the assassination, but it remained fixed in Eckols mind. Do you think this would have occurred if Sierad had simply said she was passing on prophecy? I don’t. Furthermore, Sierad said that this was something she said “to her son”, thus, she was implying by omission that she never said it to Eckols. If this was true, how would Eckols know about it?
Moreover, where did Eckols get the notion that the U.S. Congress would try to impeach JFK if Sierad had not said it? Did the FBI check to see if Sierad was a registered Republican or involved in the Republican Party? If they did, why is there no mention of what they discovered?
Another example of this apparent foreknowledge comes from Marjorie Heimbecker.
Quote on
MARJORIE HEIMBECKER, Nurse, St. Christopher’s Hospital…advised that she had attended nursing school and high school with an individual with Christina Suarez, now Mrs. Christina S. DE TORANO …Miss HEIMBECKER only recently learned from Mrs. DE TORANO that about two years ago her brother MIGUEL had said that President JOHN F. KENNEDY would be killed by Castroites. (CD 301, p. 280)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10702#relPageId=288&tab=page
Quote on
If this was just another example of prophecy then he was darn good since this would have been said in November/December of 1961. Nostradamus would have had nothing on him.
Of course both Mrs. De Torano and Miguel Suarez denied that they ever said anything like this and had nothing against JFK. Again, why would Miss Heimbecker report this to the FBI if it wasn’t said to her? She had known Christina Suarez for years so it seems odd that she would pass this on to the FBI if it was not said.
Ernest Smith worked at Sears Roebuck and was heard saying that “the President will not leave Dallas alive.” ( Ibid, p. 283) Woodrow Sooter, a member of the John Birch Society and an “extreme right-winger”, allegedly told a man named Luke Walker that there was “going to be an incident during the parade.” (Ibid, p. 284)
CD 301 is loaded with things like this, but none of these leads seemed to be investigated by the FBI, but instead the denials by those that they interviewed were taken at face value. Why?
Can any official narrative defender explain how so many examples of foreknowledge can just be a coincidence? (Again, there are many more than presented in this question. See my series for many more examples.) Furthermore, can you explain why none of these leads were fully investigated?
We again see evidence in the twenty-six volumes and CDs that dispute the claims made in the WCR. Therefore, the WC’s unsupported claims are sunk.
www.archives.gov/files/publications/prologue/2017/fall/images/warren-commission.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) assassinated President John F. Kennedy (JFK) all by himself on November 22, 1963. If this is correct, how could so many people have advanced knowledge that it would occur?
How where they able to predict his assassination so accurately?
******************************************
If there were no plans to assassinate JFK prior to November 22, 1963, how did so many people predict accurately that it would happen?
While it is probably true that many public figures receive death threats it doesn’t seem as common for them to have a prediction that they will be killed made. And yet, we have already seen in this series numerous predictions concerning JFK’s demise were made. Another example came from Mrs. Thomas Eckols as she told the FBI that she worked with a Betty Sierad at a telephone answering service in June 1962. The comments attributed to Ms. Sierad are interesting.
Quote on
She stated BETTY SIERAD pretended to be a very hard worker for the Republican Party and very much against President KENNEDY. She stated sometime during June, 1962, while they were working at the switchboard, BETTY SIERAD made the remark that during the fall of 1963, there would be a definite attempt by Congress to impeach President KENNEDY and if they failed, President KENNEDY would be assassinated. (Commission Document (CD) 301, p. 278)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10702#relPageId=287&tab=page
Quote off
Mrs Eckols would tell the FBI that she thought Sierad was “talking through her hat”, but of course her alleged comment came true on November 22. Mrs. Eckols said that Sierad left shortly after this comment and had no idea where she went, but the FBI showed that they could find anyone if they wanted to.
In her discussion with the FBI Sierad would tell them the following.
Quote on
Mrs. SIERAD stated she had never been active in politics…She stated that she had not been adverse to KENNEDY. She stated that she had made the statement to her son that “This is the year that the President would either die in office or would be assassinated.” She stated that she made this statement as a prophecy, and it was not based on any information which was known to her that KENNEDY would be assassinated. (CD 301, p. 279)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10702#relPageId=286&tab=page
Quote off
Sierad’s explanation does not change what Eckols said. Surely Eckols would not have contacted the FBI if Sierad had simply passed on a premonition as she claimed. This discussion occurred about 17 months before the assassination, but it remained fixed in Eckols mind. Do you think this would have occurred if Sierad had simply said she was passing on prophecy? I don’t. Furthermore, Sierad said that this was something she said “to her son”, thus, she was implying by omission that she never said it to Eckols. If this was true, how would Eckols know about it?
Moreover, where did Eckols get the notion that the U.S. Congress would try to impeach JFK if Sierad had not said it? Did the FBI check to see if Sierad was a registered Republican or involved in the Republican Party? If they did, why is there no mention of what they discovered?
Another example of this apparent foreknowledge comes from Marjorie Heimbecker.
Quote on
MARJORIE HEIMBECKER, Nurse, St. Christopher’s Hospital…advised that she had attended nursing school and high school with an individual with Christina Suarez, now Mrs. Christina S. DE TORANO …Miss HEIMBECKER only recently learned from Mrs. DE TORANO that about two years ago her brother MIGUEL had said that President JOHN F. KENNEDY would be killed by Castroites. (CD 301, p. 280)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10702#relPageId=288&tab=page
Quote on
If this was just another example of prophecy then he was darn good since this would have been said in November/December of 1961. Nostradamus would have had nothing on him.
Of course both Mrs. De Torano and Miguel Suarez denied that they ever said anything like this and had nothing against JFK. Again, why would Miss Heimbecker report this to the FBI if it wasn’t said to her? She had known Christina Suarez for years so it seems odd that she would pass this on to the FBI if it was not said.
Ernest Smith worked at Sears Roebuck and was heard saying that “the President will not leave Dallas alive.” ( Ibid, p. 283) Woodrow Sooter, a member of the John Birch Society and an “extreme right-winger”, allegedly told a man named Luke Walker that there was “going to be an incident during the parade.” (Ibid, p. 284)
CD 301 is loaded with things like this, but none of these leads seemed to be investigated by the FBI, but instead the denials by those that they interviewed were taken at face value. Why?
Can any official narrative defender explain how so many examples of foreknowledge can just be a coincidence? (Again, there are many more than presented in this question. See my series for many more examples.) Furthermore, can you explain why none of these leads were fully investigated?
We again see evidence in the twenty-six volumes and CDs that dispute the claims made in the WCR. Therefore, the WC’s unsupported claims are sunk.