Post by Rob Caprio on Feb 5, 2021 21:37:47 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
4.bp.blogspot.com/-p2Tk4XjjGZs/TyHXhhYHGwI/AAAAAAAAEJs/vGRbjj6nhG0/s527/JFK-Head-Wounds-Composite.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) assassinated President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, (JFK) all by himself by firing three shots from behind. As we have seen previously in this series many people saw a massive wound in the right rear area of JFK’s head, but this shouldn’t have been if he was shot from behind as claimed by the WC.
This post will look at more comments about the head wound that have not been quoted yet in this series.
**************************************
Jesse Curry was the Chief of Police for Dallas at the time of the assassination, therefore, he was in charge of collecting and evaluating the evidence. He was also riding in the lead car at the time of the shots and he ordered men to a specific area to investigate. It was NOT the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) building either.
Mr. CURRY - A sharp report as a firecracker or as it was it was the report of this rifle.
We were just approaching an underpass, and there were some people around on each side of the underpass, up in the railroad yards, and I thought at first that perhaps this was a railroad torpedo, it was a sharp crack…I said what was that, was that a firecracker, or someone said this, I don't recall whether it was me or someone else, and from the report I couldn't tell whether it was coming from the railroad yard or whether it was coming from behind but I said over the radio, I said, "Get someone up in the railroad yard and check."
Curry would attempt to offset this by saying that the shots, or reports, after the first one sounded like they came from behind, but this doesn’t offset what he said over the radio for two reasons.
Firstly, coming from behind doesn’t automatically mean the TSBD as researchers have felt shots could have come from both the Dal-Tex Building and/or the County Records Building and both of these were behind the limousine. Secondly, no matter what he claimed about echoes in regards to the first shot making it difficult to tell where it originated from he broadcasted an order to move into the railroad yards and check out the people there.
Representative FORD - When you heard the first report, did you grab a communications set and give this order?
Mr. CURRY – Almost immediately.
Representative FORD - What was the order that you gave?
Mr. CURRY - As I recall it, "Get someone up in the railroad yard to check those people." There was already an officer up there.
Curry immediately called for some of his men to check out the railroad yards so this belies his later claim of confusion as to where he thought that the first shot originated from. Furthermore, he never radioed the same order for the TSBD. That is simply part of the record.
Curry wrote a book on the assassination, and his role in it, entitled “JFK Assassination File” which covered what he saw and the evidence that had been gathered.
Here is his first comment about the head wound that he observed at Parkland Hospital (PH).
Quote on
[Secret Service] Agent [Clint] Hill finally convinced her [Jackie Kennedy] to let go of the President. Apparently she didn’t want anyone to see that the back of the President’s head was partially blown off. (Jesse Curry, JFK Assassination File, p. 32)
Quote off
This is a firsthand account by the Dallas Police Department’s (DPD) Chief and he says that part of the BACK of JFK’s head had been blown off. How could a shot from behind do this?
Curry comments on the head wound again a little further along in the book.
Quote on
The hospital was beginning to reflect the stunned confusion that had begun to grip all of us. Dr. [Malcolm] Perry came into the emergency room as other staff doctors were trying to place an endotracheal tube down the President’s throat to restore breathing. As Dr. Perry took charge he sized up the situation. A small neat wound was in the throat. The back of the head was massively damaged and blood from this wound covered the floor and the aluminum hospital cart. Ibid., p. 34)
Quote off
Again, Curry states that the BACK of the head was massively damaged. He also states that it was determined that the throat wound was a small neat wound, and this type of wound is generally one of entry. Curry will state this in this paragraph.
Quote on
Dr. Perry examined the throat wound and assessed it as the entrance wound. He was no amateur at assessing wounds. By his later testimony he stated he had previously treated from 150 to 200 gunshot wounds. The doctors were so absorbed by treatment of the massive head wound that his other wound (lower neck or upper back) was never noticed since he was lying on his back. (Ibid.)
Quote off
This paragraph shows that Dr. Perry was highly experienced with dealing with gunshot wounds and he felt that the neck wound was one of entry. He went even further and this provided me with something new to consider in terms of this shooting and what happened.
Quote on
…The tracheotomy incision later created controversy in the interpretation of the Kennedy autopsy. The Warren commission (sic) tried desperately to indicate that this wound was an exit, not an entrance wound. But at the time Dr. Perry insisted that the President was shot from the front-entering at the throat and exiting out the back of the head. Immediate speculation began about shots coming from in front of the motorcade from the grassy knoll or triple underpass. (Ibid.)
Quote off
Of course we all know that the Single Bullet Theory (SBT) claims that JFK was hit in the base of the neck (there is no evidence supporting this claim) and exited out of the neck, but here we see that Dr. Perry felt that the neck wound was one of entry and that it connected with the head wound (or at least one of them). This is something new to consider.
If the throat wound went on to strike the head and exit out the back then it had to be traveling slightly upward. Where could this shot have come from? Perhaps an answer to this question may start to unravel the mystery or at least help us to consider some new options.
We again see evidence from people with firsthand experience in the events of November 22, 1963, that totally disagrees with the conclusion provided to us by the WC, thus, their conclusion is again sunk.
4.bp.blogspot.com/-p2Tk4XjjGZs/TyHXhhYHGwI/AAAAAAAAEJs/vGRbjj6nhG0/s527/JFK-Head-Wounds-Composite.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) assassinated President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, (JFK) all by himself by firing three shots from behind. As we have seen previously in this series many people saw a massive wound in the right rear area of JFK’s head, but this shouldn’t have been if he was shot from behind as claimed by the WC.
This post will look at more comments about the head wound that have not been quoted yet in this series.
**************************************
Jesse Curry was the Chief of Police for Dallas at the time of the assassination, therefore, he was in charge of collecting and evaluating the evidence. He was also riding in the lead car at the time of the shots and he ordered men to a specific area to investigate. It was NOT the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) building either.
Mr. CURRY - A sharp report as a firecracker or as it was it was the report of this rifle.
We were just approaching an underpass, and there were some people around on each side of the underpass, up in the railroad yards, and I thought at first that perhaps this was a railroad torpedo, it was a sharp crack…I said what was that, was that a firecracker, or someone said this, I don't recall whether it was me or someone else, and from the report I couldn't tell whether it was coming from the railroad yard or whether it was coming from behind but I said over the radio, I said, "Get someone up in the railroad yard and check."
Curry would attempt to offset this by saying that the shots, or reports, after the first one sounded like they came from behind, but this doesn’t offset what he said over the radio for two reasons.
Firstly, coming from behind doesn’t automatically mean the TSBD as researchers have felt shots could have come from both the Dal-Tex Building and/or the County Records Building and both of these were behind the limousine. Secondly, no matter what he claimed about echoes in regards to the first shot making it difficult to tell where it originated from he broadcasted an order to move into the railroad yards and check out the people there.
Representative FORD - When you heard the first report, did you grab a communications set and give this order?
Mr. CURRY – Almost immediately.
Representative FORD - What was the order that you gave?
Mr. CURRY - As I recall it, "Get someone up in the railroad yard to check those people." There was already an officer up there.
Curry immediately called for some of his men to check out the railroad yards so this belies his later claim of confusion as to where he thought that the first shot originated from. Furthermore, he never radioed the same order for the TSBD. That is simply part of the record.
Curry wrote a book on the assassination, and his role in it, entitled “JFK Assassination File” which covered what he saw and the evidence that had been gathered.
Here is his first comment about the head wound that he observed at Parkland Hospital (PH).
Quote on
[Secret Service] Agent [Clint] Hill finally convinced her [Jackie Kennedy] to let go of the President. Apparently she didn’t want anyone to see that the back of the President’s head was partially blown off. (Jesse Curry, JFK Assassination File, p. 32)
Quote off
This is a firsthand account by the Dallas Police Department’s (DPD) Chief and he says that part of the BACK of JFK’s head had been blown off. How could a shot from behind do this?
Curry comments on the head wound again a little further along in the book.
Quote on
The hospital was beginning to reflect the stunned confusion that had begun to grip all of us. Dr. [Malcolm] Perry came into the emergency room as other staff doctors were trying to place an endotracheal tube down the President’s throat to restore breathing. As Dr. Perry took charge he sized up the situation. A small neat wound was in the throat. The back of the head was massively damaged and blood from this wound covered the floor and the aluminum hospital cart. Ibid., p. 34)
Quote off
Again, Curry states that the BACK of the head was massively damaged. He also states that it was determined that the throat wound was a small neat wound, and this type of wound is generally one of entry. Curry will state this in this paragraph.
Quote on
Dr. Perry examined the throat wound and assessed it as the entrance wound. He was no amateur at assessing wounds. By his later testimony he stated he had previously treated from 150 to 200 gunshot wounds. The doctors were so absorbed by treatment of the massive head wound that his other wound (lower neck or upper back) was never noticed since he was lying on his back. (Ibid.)
Quote off
This paragraph shows that Dr. Perry was highly experienced with dealing with gunshot wounds and he felt that the neck wound was one of entry. He went even further and this provided me with something new to consider in terms of this shooting and what happened.
Quote on
…The tracheotomy incision later created controversy in the interpretation of the Kennedy autopsy. The Warren commission (sic) tried desperately to indicate that this wound was an exit, not an entrance wound. But at the time Dr. Perry insisted that the President was shot from the front-entering at the throat and exiting out the back of the head. Immediate speculation began about shots coming from in front of the motorcade from the grassy knoll or triple underpass. (Ibid.)
Quote off
Of course we all know that the Single Bullet Theory (SBT) claims that JFK was hit in the base of the neck (there is no evidence supporting this claim) and exited out of the neck, but here we see that Dr. Perry felt that the neck wound was one of entry and that it connected with the head wound (or at least one of them). This is something new to consider.
If the throat wound went on to strike the head and exit out the back then it had to be traveling slightly upward. Where could this shot have come from? Perhaps an answer to this question may start to unravel the mystery or at least help us to consider some new options.
We again see evidence from people with firsthand experience in the events of November 22, 1963, that totally disagrees with the conclusion provided to us by the WC, thus, their conclusion is again sunk.