Post by Rob Caprio on Dec 4, 2018 22:06:48 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
spartacus-educational.com/JFKevicta4.jpg
George Michael Evica was interviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) and the information pertaining to SIFAR was given by him.
The SIFAR documents are Italian armed forces intelligence service documents, and they identified the Carcano allegedly found on the sixth-floor of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) as a 7.35mm model. Here are Mr. Evica's words.
Quote on
...the Italian armed forces intelligence service documents identifying the rifle reputedly found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository and photographed so that the photographs went around the world as a 7.35 rifle in appearance, re-barreled to 6.5. (George Michael Evica, ARRB testimony, March 24, 1995)
www.jfk-assassination.net/arrb/index8.htm
Quote off
He would tell the ARRB he was NOT speculating as he had some of the SIFAR documents in his possession.
He would urge the ARRB to get all the documents.
Quote on
It's very important for you, therefore, to get all the SIFAR documents -- that's the military -- Italian military intelligence service documents -- in their original Italian, including those documents generated by SIFAR in Italy but not shared with U.S. intelligence agencies, all SIFAR documents received by the FBI, the CIA, the Treasury Department from SIFAR directly or indirectly transmitted. (Ibid.)
Quote off
He urged them to talk with Robert Frazier who had all the SIFAR documents as he was willing to discuss all the ballistic evidence with the ARRB.
He moves on to the ballistics in the case.
Quote on
Beginning with former CIA chief Allen Dulles, a member of the Warren Commission, and continuing through a series of CIA officers, both active and retired, the FBI's so-called ballistics match of the rifle reportedly found in the depository, CE-399, the bullet reportedly found at Parkland, and the fragments reportedly recovered from the presidential limo, have been seriously questioned.
If you look at the 26 volumes and you look at the testimony of Robert Frazier before the Warren Commission, the commissioners themselves doubted the FBI's ballistics argument. Check it, please.
Dulles expressed his doubt directly to FBI Agent Robert Frazier when the FBI's rifle expert was making his ballistic presentation to the Commission.
Now, notice that, if we go for these documents, we're going for documents about the hard evidence that allegedly involves Lee Harvey Oswald through a broken chain of evidence from that ballistics match that the Warren Commission members did not buy through a rifle that cannot be linked directly to Lee Harvey Oswald to the assassination. (Ibid.)
Quote off
These are the facts pertaining to the "evidence" put forth by the Warren Commission (WC), to argue otherwise is just silly. Mr. Evica continues his testimony.
Quote on
Very important, therefore, that you look for, as I said in my documents section on this topic, the FBI's original microscopic comparisons in photographs and slides that need to be recovered from wherever they are. FBI Agent Robert Frazier's notes and work materials need to be recovered so that an independent analysis of the ballistics evidence as it was available to the FBI, not now, but in November of '63 can be made.
I can assure you that, when you take the original FBI spectrographic reports and the original FBI neutron activation analysis tests – and I have those documents from the FBI, and by the way, some or all of them are missing now from the National Archives, so I may be one of the people from whom you need to get documents that no longer exist either in the FBI files or in the National Archives -- that I would urge you to have those independently checked by a spectroscopist and a neutron activation analysis person. (Ibid.)
Quote off
Why are things missing from the National Archives? Why is President John F. Kennedy’s brain missing? Why are there so many things that we still do not know about?
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
spartacus-educational.com/JFKevicta4.jpg
George Michael Evica was interviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) and the information pertaining to SIFAR was given by him.
The SIFAR documents are Italian armed forces intelligence service documents, and they identified the Carcano allegedly found on the sixth-floor of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) as a 7.35mm model. Here are Mr. Evica's words.
Quote on
...the Italian armed forces intelligence service documents identifying the rifle reputedly found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository and photographed so that the photographs went around the world as a 7.35 rifle in appearance, re-barreled to 6.5. (George Michael Evica, ARRB testimony, March 24, 1995)
www.jfk-assassination.net/arrb/index8.htm
Quote off
He would tell the ARRB he was NOT speculating as he had some of the SIFAR documents in his possession.
He would urge the ARRB to get all the documents.
Quote on
It's very important for you, therefore, to get all the SIFAR documents -- that's the military -- Italian military intelligence service documents -- in their original Italian, including those documents generated by SIFAR in Italy but not shared with U.S. intelligence agencies, all SIFAR documents received by the FBI, the CIA, the Treasury Department from SIFAR directly or indirectly transmitted. (Ibid.)
Quote off
He urged them to talk with Robert Frazier who had all the SIFAR documents as he was willing to discuss all the ballistic evidence with the ARRB.
He moves on to the ballistics in the case.
Quote on
Beginning with former CIA chief Allen Dulles, a member of the Warren Commission, and continuing through a series of CIA officers, both active and retired, the FBI's so-called ballistics match of the rifle reportedly found in the depository, CE-399, the bullet reportedly found at Parkland, and the fragments reportedly recovered from the presidential limo, have been seriously questioned.
If you look at the 26 volumes and you look at the testimony of Robert Frazier before the Warren Commission, the commissioners themselves doubted the FBI's ballistics argument. Check it, please.
Dulles expressed his doubt directly to FBI Agent Robert Frazier when the FBI's rifle expert was making his ballistic presentation to the Commission.
Now, notice that, if we go for these documents, we're going for documents about the hard evidence that allegedly involves Lee Harvey Oswald through a broken chain of evidence from that ballistics match that the Warren Commission members did not buy through a rifle that cannot be linked directly to Lee Harvey Oswald to the assassination. (Ibid.)
Quote off
These are the facts pertaining to the "evidence" put forth by the Warren Commission (WC), to argue otherwise is just silly. Mr. Evica continues his testimony.
Quote on
Very important, therefore, that you look for, as I said in my documents section on this topic, the FBI's original microscopic comparisons in photographs and slides that need to be recovered from wherever they are. FBI Agent Robert Frazier's notes and work materials need to be recovered so that an independent analysis of the ballistics evidence as it was available to the FBI, not now, but in November of '63 can be made.
I can assure you that, when you take the original FBI spectrographic reports and the original FBI neutron activation analysis tests – and I have those documents from the FBI, and by the way, some or all of them are missing now from the National Archives, so I may be one of the people from whom you need to get documents that no longer exist either in the FBI files or in the National Archives -- that I would urge you to have those independently checked by a spectroscopist and a neutron activation analysis person. (Ibid.)
Quote off
Why are things missing from the National Archives? Why is President John F. Kennedy’s brain missing? Why are there so many things that we still do not know about?