Post by Rob Caprio on Apr 26, 2020 20:19:37 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other peoples' words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
Ben Holmes is arguing in another thread that Marina Oswald’s testimony of taking a backyard photo (CE-133A) is evidence! I am calling him a liar because he said it is a FACT that there is evidence that CE-133A is authentic. He said this to me awhile ago about this.
Quote on
Sadly, the fact that there's evidence for the authenticity of CE-133A is simply a fact...much as the fact that a watch was found among Oswald's possessions. (Ben Holmes)
Quote off
NOW he is lying and saying the evidence is Marina's testimony when I challenged him to list this evidence for me. OF course he first tried to divert and get me to list a definition for the word evidence, but when that didn't work he mentioned this testimony.
First of all, the testimony would NOT have been allowed in a court of law since it is protected under "spousal privledge". Secondly, it is NOTHING but a claim, it is NOT evidence that can be used as proof. Even Ben said so when he responded to my "Unsupported Claims of Ben Holmes" post. Here is comment.
Quote on
Ben never proved Marina did in fact take CE-133A (backyard photo), and that it is AUTHENTIC." (Robert)
Don't need to "prove" it, this is Marina's claim. (Ben Holmes)
Quote off
So how is a "claim" evidence to the point that it is a FACT that CE-133A is authentic? OF course the liar is twisting this and saying he just meant it is a FACT there is evidence (after he admitted it is really just a claim), and NOT that CE-133A is authentic! He is a liar, and here is the PROOF in his OWN WORDS!
Quote on
There *IS* evidence that it's authentic. That's merely a fact. Why bother to deny it, Rob? (Ben Holmes)
Quote off
See, he did say it is a FACT that there is evidence which shows it is authentic, but again, when asked all we get is what he HIMSELF called a claim! Why is he a liar? Why does he lie so much to the BENEFIT of the WC? Why can't he SUPPORT his claim that CE-133A is authentic?
There is NO evidence CE-133A, or any of the others are authentic, as the ONLY thing that the Warren Commission (WC) gave us was biased testimony by Marina which would have been barred in a court of law! There is NO evidnece for where this photograph was developed, and certainly NO other evidence to prove it is authentic.
Ben and Walt lie when they claim it is authentic as they can't prove it, but the issues it shares are consistent with the other four photographs, so either they are ALL fake, or ALL real! These two have taken the WC's lie (two are authentic) and made it even more absurd by claiming that just one is real!
We have two WC shills here in the form of "Ben" and "Walt".
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other peoples' words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
Ben Holmes is arguing in another thread that Marina Oswald’s testimony of taking a backyard photo (CE-133A) is evidence! I am calling him a liar because he said it is a FACT that there is evidence that CE-133A is authentic. He said this to me awhile ago about this.
Quote on
Sadly, the fact that there's evidence for the authenticity of CE-133A is simply a fact...much as the fact that a watch was found among Oswald's possessions. (Ben Holmes)
Quote off
NOW he is lying and saying the evidence is Marina's testimony when I challenged him to list this evidence for me. OF course he first tried to divert and get me to list a definition for the word evidence, but when that didn't work he mentioned this testimony.
First of all, the testimony would NOT have been allowed in a court of law since it is protected under "spousal privledge". Secondly, it is NOTHING but a claim, it is NOT evidence that can be used as proof. Even Ben said so when he responded to my "Unsupported Claims of Ben Holmes" post. Here is comment.
Quote on
Ben never proved Marina did in fact take CE-133A (backyard photo), and that it is AUTHENTIC." (Robert)
Don't need to "prove" it, this is Marina's claim. (Ben Holmes)
Quote off
So how is a "claim" evidence to the point that it is a FACT that CE-133A is authentic? OF course the liar is twisting this and saying he just meant it is a FACT there is evidence (after he admitted it is really just a claim), and NOT that CE-133A is authentic! He is a liar, and here is the PROOF in his OWN WORDS!
Quote on
There *IS* evidence that it's authentic. That's merely a fact. Why bother to deny it, Rob? (Ben Holmes)
Quote off
See, he did say it is a FACT that there is evidence which shows it is authentic, but again, when asked all we get is what he HIMSELF called a claim! Why is he a liar? Why does he lie so much to the BENEFIT of the WC? Why can't he SUPPORT his claim that CE-133A is authentic?
There is NO evidence CE-133A, or any of the others are authentic, as the ONLY thing that the Warren Commission (WC) gave us was biased testimony by Marina which would have been barred in a court of law! There is NO evidnece for where this photograph was developed, and certainly NO other evidence to prove it is authentic.
Ben and Walt lie when they claim it is authentic as they can't prove it, but the issues it shares are consistent with the other four photographs, so either they are ALL fake, or ALL real! These two have taken the WC's lie (two are authentic) and made it even more absurd by claiming that just one is real!
We have two WC shills here in the form of "Ben" and "Walt".