Post by Rob Caprio on Apr 27, 2020 20:53:32 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
www.john-f-kennedy.info/fileman/Uploads/Bilder/Personenregister/CRENSHAW_Charles.jpg
Jeremy Gunn and Douglas Horne of Texas Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) interviewed Doctor Charles Crenshaw on March 19, 1997. Dr. Crenshaw was present in Trauma Room One at Parkland Hospital on November 22, 1963, when President John F. Kennedy (JFK) was brought in following the shooting in Dealey Plaza (DP).
Here is a summary of what he observed.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/pages/md183_0002a.gif
* He saw one head wound;
* Head wound was behind right ear, in the occipital-parietal region, in right rear quadrant of the head, and was baseball sized;
* Brain matter was oozing out, and had a consistency resembling oatmeal;
* He feels he definitely saw cerebellum extruding from the wound;
* There was a complete absence of bone, hair and scalp at the wound site;
* There was a large blood clot high in the left forehead, above the left eye, but when the body was washed at Parkland after the President was declared dead, there was no wound there;
* He observed what he interpreted as a classic bullet entrance wound in the anterior neck, the size of one's little finger, just prior to the performance of the tracheostomy by Dr. Perry;
* He observed no damage to the right side of the head, above the ear or forward of the ear, nor did he observe any damage to the top of the head. (ARRB MD-183, Summary of March 19, 1997, interview with Dr. Charles Crenshaw, p. 2)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/html/md183_0002a.htm
Head wound sketch:
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/pages/md183_0006a.gif
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/html/md183_0006a.htm
Quote off
All of these observations contradict the official claims in regards to the wounds JFK suffered during the assassination. The description that he gave the ARRB matches a frontal shot, and not one from behind as the Warren Commission (WC) and House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) claimed. Was this why Crenshaw was never called by either “investigation"?
What could have caused the blood clot on the left forehead of JFK if there was no wound there? The anterior neck wound was again one of entrance according to Dr. Crenshaw. The top of the head was intact, but the WC said it was blown open. This has always been curious as how does a bullet traveling DOWNWARD go UPWARD upon impact? I don't know, but that is what the WC claimed happened.
He recounted how Secret Service (SS) and FBI agents visited Parkland Hospital (PH) following the assassination. He said that he was not aware of any of these agents forcing changes in testimony, but others have said that SS Agent Elmer Moore coerced witnesses into changing their testimony. According to James Gouchenaur, Moore told him years later that he expressed remorse for badgering Doctor Malcolm Perry into changing his testimony regarding the throat wound which Perry had said was a wound of entrance. After visits by SA Moore Dr. Perry altered the wound to one of exit.
Dr. Crenshaw clearly saw wounds that did not match what the official “investigations" said in their reports. He was far from alone as all the witnesses that saw JFK's body stated wounds similar to the ones Dr. Crenshaw saw.
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
www.john-f-kennedy.info/fileman/Uploads/Bilder/Personenregister/CRENSHAW_Charles.jpg
Jeremy Gunn and Douglas Horne of Texas Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) interviewed Doctor Charles Crenshaw on March 19, 1997. Dr. Crenshaw was present in Trauma Room One at Parkland Hospital on November 22, 1963, when President John F. Kennedy (JFK) was brought in following the shooting in Dealey Plaza (DP).
Here is a summary of what he observed.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/pages/md183_0002a.gif
* He saw one head wound;
* Head wound was behind right ear, in the occipital-parietal region, in right rear quadrant of the head, and was baseball sized;
* Brain matter was oozing out, and had a consistency resembling oatmeal;
* He feels he definitely saw cerebellum extruding from the wound;
* There was a complete absence of bone, hair and scalp at the wound site;
* There was a large blood clot high in the left forehead, above the left eye, but when the body was washed at Parkland after the President was declared dead, there was no wound there;
* He observed what he interpreted as a classic bullet entrance wound in the anterior neck, the size of one's little finger, just prior to the performance of the tracheostomy by Dr. Perry;
* He observed no damage to the right side of the head, above the ear or forward of the ear, nor did he observe any damage to the top of the head. (ARRB MD-183, Summary of March 19, 1997, interview with Dr. Charles Crenshaw, p. 2)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/html/md183_0002a.htm
Head wound sketch:
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/pages/md183_0006a.gif
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md183/html/md183_0006a.htm
Quote off
All of these observations contradict the official claims in regards to the wounds JFK suffered during the assassination. The description that he gave the ARRB matches a frontal shot, and not one from behind as the Warren Commission (WC) and House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) claimed. Was this why Crenshaw was never called by either “investigation"?
What could have caused the blood clot on the left forehead of JFK if there was no wound there? The anterior neck wound was again one of entrance according to Dr. Crenshaw. The top of the head was intact, but the WC said it was blown open. This has always been curious as how does a bullet traveling DOWNWARD go UPWARD upon impact? I don't know, but that is what the WC claimed happened.
He recounted how Secret Service (SS) and FBI agents visited Parkland Hospital (PH) following the assassination. He said that he was not aware of any of these agents forcing changes in testimony, but others have said that SS Agent Elmer Moore coerced witnesses into changing their testimony. According to James Gouchenaur, Moore told him years later that he expressed remorse for badgering Doctor Malcolm Perry into changing his testimony regarding the throat wound which Perry had said was a wound of entrance. After visits by SA Moore Dr. Perry altered the wound to one of exit.
Dr. Crenshaw clearly saw wounds that did not match what the official “investigations" said in their reports. He was far from alone as all the witnesses that saw JFK's body stated wounds similar to the ones Dr. Crenshaw saw.