Post by Rob Caprio on Jun 20, 2020 13:12:15 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
J. Walton Moore:
4.bp.blogspot.com/-waWzIcgd_Xk/URLD2XPv9JI/AAAAAAAAX7w/fgLwmqkd0QY/s640/jwaltonmoore.jpg
static.wixstatic.com/media/55255f_7a247ed997e84853a3266e982bf06296~mv2.jpg
J. Walton Moore of the CIA's Domestic Contact Service in Dallas would tell the Warren Commission (WC) that he had ONLY two contacts with George de Mohrenschildt, but the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) showed this was false when they looked at the issue during their probe. The claim of only two meetings was contained in a April 13, 1977, memorandum Moore had done for the Agency. He would deny any discussion of LHO with George. However, the HSCA cited a May 1, 1964, memorandum in which Moore said he had known the de Mohrenschildts since 1957. During his March 14, 1978, testimony he had to REVISE his statement to “periodic debriefings” of George from ONLY two meetings. This showed he LIED in his 1977 memorandum. He continued to deny that he ever discussed LHO with George though and said the claim that he had told him to contact LHO was false, but who can believe him now? What would you expect him to say? For the full details go here:
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0029b.gif
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0029b.htm
This look at de Mohrenshildt by the HSCA contained information regarding the President of Haiti too that could be construed as suspicious. In September 1964 a reporter by the name of Norman Gale of the Washington Post published an article that looked into activities of Francois Duvalier. The article would claim the following:
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0031a.gif
1—Two T-28 fighters were sent ILLEGALLY to Duvalier from Dallas, Texas.
2—Duvalier made a down payment on the planes with a line of credit worth $210,000 drawn from the Banque Commerciale Port-au-Prince. Clemand Joseph Charles was the principle stockholder of that bank and he was a close friend of Duvalier.
3—Charles had visited the U.S. earlier in 1963 to purchase boats and weapons and he had spent time in Dallas, Texas during his trip.
4—I. Irving Davidson, a Washington lobbyist, visited Haiti in May 1963 with two Dallas arms suppliers.
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0031a.htm
Quote off
When interviewed by the HSCA on November 2, 1978, Davidson would deny all of this. Davidson would say that he was contacted in 1967 by Leonard Davidov and Hugh MacDonald because they wanted Davidson to make inquiries involving de Mohrenschildt’s background. Davidson said they were working to uncover evidence showing de Mohrenschildt was involved in JFK’s murder and that President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) had advanced knowledge that it would happen.
On page 60 of the same summary we see more interesting stuff. We will see the names Joseph Dryer and Jacqueline Lancelot. Joseph Dryer worked as a stockbroker with Loeb & Rhodes & Co. in Palm Beach, Florida, and Jacqueline Lancelot owned a well-known restaurant in Petionville, Haiti. Here is what the HSCA reported.
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0032b.gif
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0033a.gif
(74) Dryer said in the interview that Lancelot told him shortly after the Kennedy assassination that a “substantial” amount of money, $200,000 or $250,000, had been deposited in de Mohrenschildt’s account in a bank in Port-au-Prince. According to Lancelot it was not Charles’ bank. Lancelot said her source of information was the person who handed out the funds at the bank. The money in the account was subsequently paid out, although she did not know to whom, and de Mohrenschildt left Haiti soon after.
(75) According to Dryer, Lancelot related to him that President Duvalier had once implied that the American President might not remain in office. Lancelot reportedly said that during a speech to Haitian troops in a port city, Duvalier allegedly said “that the big man in the White House wasn’t going to be there much longer.” Lancelot told Dryer she was not sure if that statement was made by Duvalier before or after President Kennedy’s assassination. (HSCA, XII, pp. 60-61)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0032b.htm
Quote off
We again see the possibility of President Duvalier having advanced knowledge of what was to come. The U.S. had tried to exert control over Haiti for a long time, and with de Mohrenschildt’s trip there in April 1963 he could have been the conduit for such a plan. With his long list of suspicious ties to the intelligence world we can only imagine what was asked of him. The large amount of money being deposited into his account shortly after November 22, 1963, is cause for alarm too. Was it for his role in the assassination or for his help in framing LHO for the murder?
On page 49 of the same summary the HSCA noted concern about his untimely death too.
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0027a.gif
Quote on
This probe [of de Mohrenschildt’s background] seemed justified in view of the controversy that continues to surround the relationship [with LHO], and the additional speculation that was caused by the apparent suicide of de Mohrenschildt in 1977 ON THE DAY HE WAS CONTACTED BY both an investigator [Fonzi] from the committee and a writer about Oswald. (HSCA, XII, p. 49) (Emphasis added)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0027a.htm
Quote off
He had NO problem speaking with Epstein and granted a long interview, so why would he kill himself over doing the same with the HSCA? It would seem more likely someone else did NOT want him speaking with the HSCA about what he knew. By the time of the of the request by the HSCA de Mohrenschildt was a troubled man and one who would have said way more than he should have in all likelihood. As with the WC hearings, many would die around the time of the HSCA inquiry too. Far too many for it to be just another coincidence.
What de Mohrenschildt’s actual role was in all of this will probably never be known fully, but we have the comment he made in his manuscript he was working on for some evidence that sinks the WC’s conclusion about the murder of Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit. The working title of the book was I Am A Patsy! I Am A Patsy! and this alone sheds doubt on him killing himself to me as he had this book to finish. In the very first paragraph he calls LHO the “supposed assassin” instead of THE assassin. He says this later on about his and his wife’s depositions before the WC’s lawyer.
Quote on
Although our depositions were supposed to remain confidential, all three hundred pages of irrelevant conversation were printed and promiscuously distributed. Actually, our depositions were longer than Marina’s and Ms. Marguerite Oswald’s put together. Why?
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0039a.gif
We assume two reasons—to waste taxpayer’s money and to distract attention of the American people from the people involved in the assassination of President Kennedy…And all of this because my wife and I liked Lee Harvey Oswald, tried to defend him, and because Lee said, before he died: “I liked and admired George de Mohrenschildt.”
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0039a.htm
Quote off
He summed up quickly what the purpose of the WC was—to DISTRACT the American people from the people who assassinated JFK. De Mohrenschildt wrote this much later in his book about the type of pistol he saw LHO with.
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0133b.gif
The BERETTA we saw in his apartment was well oiled and immaculately clean. Another bow to the United States Marine Corps. But whatever later testimony tried to prove, I knew he was NOT particularly a good shot. (George de Mohrenschildt, I Am A Patsy! I Am A Patsy!, p. 262) (Emphasis added)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0133b.htm
Quote off
It would seem according to de Mohreschildt, LHO owned a Beretta pistol, thus we have to ask, why would he buy a much cheaper and less reliable revolver? Also, note how he said LHO cleaned and maintained his pistol while the WC could NOT produce any evidence he had any cleaning equipment in his possession. How do we balance these two different situations?
J. Walton Moore:
4.bp.blogspot.com/-waWzIcgd_Xk/URLD2XPv9JI/AAAAAAAAX7w/fgLwmqkd0QY/s640/jwaltonmoore.jpg
static.wixstatic.com/media/55255f_7a247ed997e84853a3266e982bf06296~mv2.jpg
J. Walton Moore of the CIA's Domestic Contact Service in Dallas would tell the Warren Commission (WC) that he had ONLY two contacts with George de Mohrenschildt, but the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) showed this was false when they looked at the issue during their probe. The claim of only two meetings was contained in a April 13, 1977, memorandum Moore had done for the Agency. He would deny any discussion of LHO with George. However, the HSCA cited a May 1, 1964, memorandum in which Moore said he had known the de Mohrenschildts since 1957. During his March 14, 1978, testimony he had to REVISE his statement to “periodic debriefings” of George from ONLY two meetings. This showed he LIED in his 1977 memorandum. He continued to deny that he ever discussed LHO with George though and said the claim that he had told him to contact LHO was false, but who can believe him now? What would you expect him to say? For the full details go here:
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0029b.gif
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0029b.htm
This look at de Mohrenshildt by the HSCA contained information regarding the President of Haiti too that could be construed as suspicious. In September 1964 a reporter by the name of Norman Gale of the Washington Post published an article that looked into activities of Francois Duvalier. The article would claim the following:
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0031a.gif
1—Two T-28 fighters were sent ILLEGALLY to Duvalier from Dallas, Texas.
2—Duvalier made a down payment on the planes with a line of credit worth $210,000 drawn from the Banque Commerciale Port-au-Prince. Clemand Joseph Charles was the principle stockholder of that bank and he was a close friend of Duvalier.
3—Charles had visited the U.S. earlier in 1963 to purchase boats and weapons and he had spent time in Dallas, Texas during his trip.
4—I. Irving Davidson, a Washington lobbyist, visited Haiti in May 1963 with two Dallas arms suppliers.
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0031a.htm
Quote off
When interviewed by the HSCA on November 2, 1978, Davidson would deny all of this. Davidson would say that he was contacted in 1967 by Leonard Davidov and Hugh MacDonald because they wanted Davidson to make inquiries involving de Mohrenschildt’s background. Davidson said they were working to uncover evidence showing de Mohrenschildt was involved in JFK’s murder and that President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) had advanced knowledge that it would happen.
On page 60 of the same summary we see more interesting stuff. We will see the names Joseph Dryer and Jacqueline Lancelot. Joseph Dryer worked as a stockbroker with Loeb & Rhodes & Co. in Palm Beach, Florida, and Jacqueline Lancelot owned a well-known restaurant in Petionville, Haiti. Here is what the HSCA reported.
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0032b.gif
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0033a.gif
(74) Dryer said in the interview that Lancelot told him shortly after the Kennedy assassination that a “substantial” amount of money, $200,000 or $250,000, had been deposited in de Mohrenschildt’s account in a bank in Port-au-Prince. According to Lancelot it was not Charles’ bank. Lancelot said her source of information was the person who handed out the funds at the bank. The money in the account was subsequently paid out, although she did not know to whom, and de Mohrenschildt left Haiti soon after.
(75) According to Dryer, Lancelot related to him that President Duvalier had once implied that the American President might not remain in office. Lancelot reportedly said that during a speech to Haitian troops in a port city, Duvalier allegedly said “that the big man in the White House wasn’t going to be there much longer.” Lancelot told Dryer she was not sure if that statement was made by Duvalier before or after President Kennedy’s assassination. (HSCA, XII, pp. 60-61)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0032b.htm
Quote off
We again see the possibility of President Duvalier having advanced knowledge of what was to come. The U.S. had tried to exert control over Haiti for a long time, and with de Mohrenschildt’s trip there in April 1963 he could have been the conduit for such a plan. With his long list of suspicious ties to the intelligence world we can only imagine what was asked of him. The large amount of money being deposited into his account shortly after November 22, 1963, is cause for alarm too. Was it for his role in the assassination or for his help in framing LHO for the murder?
On page 49 of the same summary the HSCA noted concern about his untimely death too.
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0027a.gif
Quote on
This probe [of de Mohrenschildt’s background] seemed justified in view of the controversy that continues to surround the relationship [with LHO], and the additional speculation that was caused by the apparent suicide of de Mohrenschildt in 1977 ON THE DAY HE WAS CONTACTED BY both an investigator [Fonzi] from the committee and a writer about Oswald. (HSCA, XII, p. 49) (Emphasis added)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0027a.htm
Quote off
He had NO problem speaking with Epstein and granted a long interview, so why would he kill himself over doing the same with the HSCA? It would seem more likely someone else did NOT want him speaking with the HSCA about what he knew. By the time of the of the request by the HSCA de Mohrenschildt was a troubled man and one who would have said way more than he should have in all likelihood. As with the WC hearings, many would die around the time of the HSCA inquiry too. Far too many for it to be just another coincidence.
What de Mohrenschildt’s actual role was in all of this will probably never be known fully, but we have the comment he made in his manuscript he was working on for some evidence that sinks the WC’s conclusion about the murder of Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit. The working title of the book was I Am A Patsy! I Am A Patsy! and this alone sheds doubt on him killing himself to me as he had this book to finish. In the very first paragraph he calls LHO the “supposed assassin” instead of THE assassin. He says this later on about his and his wife’s depositions before the WC’s lawyer.
Quote on
Although our depositions were supposed to remain confidential, all three hundred pages of irrelevant conversation were printed and promiscuously distributed. Actually, our depositions were longer than Marina’s and Ms. Marguerite Oswald’s put together. Why?
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0039a.gif
We assume two reasons—to waste taxpayer’s money and to distract attention of the American people from the people involved in the assassination of President Kennedy…And all of this because my wife and I liked Lee Harvey Oswald, tried to defend him, and because Lee said, before he died: “I liked and admired George de Mohrenschildt.”
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0039a.htm
Quote off
He summed up quickly what the purpose of the WC was—to DISTRACT the American people from the people who assassinated JFK. De Mohrenschildt wrote this much later in his book about the type of pistol he saw LHO with.
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/pages/HSCA_Vol12_0133b.gif
The BERETTA we saw in his apartment was well oiled and immaculately clean. Another bow to the United States Marine Corps. But whatever later testimony tried to prove, I knew he was NOT particularly a good shot. (George de Mohrenschildt, I Am A Patsy! I Am A Patsy!, p. 262) (Emphasis added)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol12/html/HSCA_Vol12_0133b.htm
Quote off
It would seem according to de Mohreschildt, LHO owned a Beretta pistol, thus we have to ask, why would he buy a much cheaper and less reliable revolver? Also, note how he said LHO cleaned and maintained his pistol while the WC could NOT produce any evidence he had any cleaning equipment in his possession. How do we balance these two different situations?