Post by Rob Caprio on Oct 14, 2022 19:30:16 GMT -5
All portions copyright Robert Caprio 2006-2024
www.awesomestories.com/images/user/62570dd4ff.jpg
1.bp.blogspot.com/-D72AQDuJ86U/UpqjV-JlWWI/AAAAAAAAxSg/FZTf3zwBgcc/s1600/Memo-Dated-11-23-63-Regarding-Lt-Day-Finding-Print-On-Rifle.jpg
IF there was a palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald’s found on the alleged murder weapon (CE-139) on the day of the assassination (as claimed by the Warren Commission and Lt. Carl Day), how could the Deputy Chief of the Dallas Police Department (DPD) NOT know about it?
IF we go to Commission Exhibit (CE) 2167 we will see an interview the Deputy Chief did with Bob Clark of WFAA-TV on Saturday morning (11/23/63). It states in it that Deputy Chief M. W. Stevenson had been on duty ALL NIGHT, thus, he should be in a position to know about any evidence that developed that day and during the early hours of 11/23/63, but when asked about prints he said this.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/pages/WH_Vol24_0418b.gif
Q. Could you tell us whether there where any fingerprints found on that rifle?
STEVENSON. To my knowledge, I DON’T KNOW. (Emphasis mine) (CE 2167, p. 2)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0418b.htm
Quote off
So we see as of the morning of 11/23/63 the DPD still had NO idea about any prints on the alleged murder weapon! How does this jive with Lt. Day’s claim that he found the palm print on 11/22/63? There were several ridge formations seen near the trigger housing but they were NOT identifiable so they are irrelevant to this discussion. The ONLY print that was traced, allegedly, to LHO was the palm print and here we see the man in CHARGE during the late night and early morning of the day after the assassination saying he is NOT aware of ANY PRINTS being found on the rifle.
www.awesomestories.com/images/user/62570dd4ff.jpg
1.bp.blogspot.com/-D72AQDuJ86U/UpqjV-JlWWI/AAAAAAAAxSg/FZTf3zwBgcc/s1600/Memo-Dated-11-23-63-Regarding-Lt-Day-Finding-Print-On-Rifle.jpg
IF there was a palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald’s found on the alleged murder weapon (CE-139) on the day of the assassination (as claimed by the Warren Commission and Lt. Carl Day), how could the Deputy Chief of the Dallas Police Department (DPD) NOT know about it?
IF we go to Commission Exhibit (CE) 2167 we will see an interview the Deputy Chief did with Bob Clark of WFAA-TV on Saturday morning (11/23/63). It states in it that Deputy Chief M. W. Stevenson had been on duty ALL NIGHT, thus, he should be in a position to know about any evidence that developed that day and during the early hours of 11/23/63, but when asked about prints he said this.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/pages/WH_Vol24_0418b.gif
Q. Could you tell us whether there where any fingerprints found on that rifle?
STEVENSON. To my knowledge, I DON’T KNOW. (Emphasis mine) (CE 2167, p. 2)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0418b.htm
Quote off
So we see as of the morning of 11/23/63 the DPD still had NO idea about any prints on the alleged murder weapon! How does this jive with Lt. Day’s claim that he found the palm print on 11/22/63? There were several ridge formations seen near the trigger housing but they were NOT identifiable so they are irrelevant to this discussion. The ONLY print that was traced, allegedly, to LHO was the palm print and here we see the man in CHARGE during the late night and early morning of the day after the assassination saying he is NOT aware of ANY PRINTS being found on the rifle.