Post by Rob Caprio on Nov 7, 2022 21:00:09 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Garrison_Jim.jpg
3.bp.blogspot.com/-6h-XbHkjxIo/U-FLZwwYX8I/AAAAAAAA2Hg/KURD-Lwr1Zo/s530/Commission-Document-630--(12).jpg
jfk.deeppoliticsforum.com/morningstar/crux2.jpg
Key witnesses were ignored by the Warren Commission (WC) during their time “investigating" the murder of Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit (JDT) in 1964. Fortunately for us, other researchers and New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison didn’t ignore them.
The Wrights lived about half-a-block from the JDT crime scene, but the WC didn’t feel it was necessary to call either of them in 1964. In July 1964 a couple researching the assassination, George and Patricia Nash, did an interview with Frank and Mary Wright. The Wright’s house was located a half-a-block east of the shooting at 501 E 10th. Frank Wright, who was nearly a block away, said he saw a man standing over a policeman who had just been shot but he did not see the man with a gun. The man got into a car that was facing in the opposite direction of Wright and he then drove off. Wright described the car as a gray, 1951 Plymouth coupe. He would be the only witness to say the assailant drove off in a car. Mary Wright called the police to report the shooting. It has been said that she too said two men were involved in the shooting, but this is all we really have to go on since the WC, Dallas Police Department (DPD) and the FBI saw fit to ignore them for the most part. Here is what the FBI wrote about the Wrights.
Quote on
…The Wrights…have yet to come forth to volunteer any information concerning this matter, and it is not felt we should interview or interject ourselves into a strictly local murder case wherein our participation was limited to specific requests by the Commission. Further, the information furnished by the Wrights is not subject to verification and would lend undue credence to the Nashs' article which when compared with the over-all findings of the Commission concerning the Tippit murder is filled with inaccurate information. (FBI 62-109090, Section 28, p. 138)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62236#relPageId=138
Quote off
Isn’t it ironic that they didn’t want to interject themselves into the JDT murder because it was local, but they were all over the murder of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) when that too was a local crime? The FBI had no jurisdiction for either crime, but they only worried about jurisdiction when they wanted to ignore witnesses it would seem.
In an article called The Other Witnesses by George and Paticia Nash, Wright said the following thing.
Quote on
I was sitting watching television with my wife. I was sitting in a chair next to the door. I wasn’t but two steps from the door. I heard shots. I knew it wasn’t backfire. I knew it was shots. As soon as I heard them, I went out the door. I could see a police car in the next block. It was toward the end of the next block. I could see it clearly. The police car was headed toward me. It was parked on the south side of the street. In other words, it was parked across the street from our apartment house. I saw a person right by the car. He had fallen down. It seems as if he had just fallen down. He was on the ground, and then he turned over face down. Part of him was under the left front fender of the car. It seems to me that I saw him just as he hit the ground. I saw him turn over and he didn’t move any more.
I looked around to see what had happened. I knew there had been a shooting. I saw a man standing right in front of the car. He was looking toward the man on the ground. He stood there for a while and looked at the man. The man who was standing in front of him was about medium height. He had on a long coat. It ended just above his hands. I didn’t see any gun. He ran around on the passenger side of the police car. He ran as fast as he could go and he got into his car. His car was a grey, little old coupe. It was about a 1950–1951, maybe a Plymouth. It was a grey car, parked on the same side of the street as the police car but beyond it from me. It was heading away from me. He got in that car and he drove away as quick as you could see. He drove down 10th Street, away from me. I don’t know how far he drove. After he got into the middle of the next block between Patton and Crawford, I didn’t look at him any more. There was no one out there except me and that woman when I got there, except for the man I described earlier. I couldn’t figure out who did the shooting. I didn’t see a gun on the man who was standing in front of the car.
…There wasn’t anyone else but the man who drove away and the woman who came down from her porch. I was the first person out. I knew there wasn’t anyone else there at all. It wasn’t any time at all until the ambulance got there. By the time the ambulance got there, there were maybe 25 more people outside. Then after a while, the police came up. I tried to tell two or three people what I saw. They didn’t pay any attention. I’ve seen what came out on television and in the papers but I know that’s not what happened. I know a man drove off in a grey car. Nothing in the world’s going to change my opinion. I saw that man drive off in a grey coupe just as clear as I was born. I know what I saw They can say all they want about a fellow running away, but I can’t accept this because I saw a fellow get in a car and drive away. (Ibid., pp. 141-142)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62236#relPageId=141
Quote off
Who was this man that Frank Wright saw? Was he simply a passerby unwilling to get involved as the writers ask or was he a shooter? If he was simply a passersby, why would the authorities ignore him and this issue all together? It would seem their actions suggest that they suspected him to be more.
Frank Wright was adamant about what he saw and said nothing would change his mind. The article made a good point too about Mrs. Wright calling the police to report the shooting, so why did the DPD NOT seem to know where they lived to question them? Ditto the FBI? For the record—they did NOT say it was Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) that they saw shoot JDT. LHO was NOT wearing a long coat that day. Nor would LHO have the time to just stand there for awhile either as he had a very compact timetable to keep IF you believe the WC's version of events.
In the interview the Nashes also ask Mary Wright what she saw and heard. Here are the relevant portions.
Quote on
…I heard three shots. From my window I got a clear view of a man lying on the street. …I didn’t wait a minute. I ran to the telephone…picked it up and dialed “O.” I said, “Call the police, a man's been shot!” After that I went outside to join my husband. It wasn’t but a minute till the ambulance got there.“ (Ibid., p. 142)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62236#relPageId=142
Quote off
How does an ambulance arrive so fast? The official explanation was that the Dudley Hughes Funeral Home was only two blocks from the scene and an ambulance was dispatched immediately. The call was received at 1:18 PM and the ambulance arrived at Tenth and Patton at 1:18 PM. Does anyone really believe that an ambulance could arrive in sixty-seconds or less in real life? If you don’t then it has to be assumed that it was standing by for a body. This would mean a conspiracy.
gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/wright-article.jpg
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Garrison_Jim.jpg
3.bp.blogspot.com/-6h-XbHkjxIo/U-FLZwwYX8I/AAAAAAAA2Hg/KURD-Lwr1Zo/s530/Commission-Document-630--(12).jpg
jfk.deeppoliticsforum.com/morningstar/crux2.jpg
Key witnesses were ignored by the Warren Commission (WC) during their time “investigating" the murder of Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit (JDT) in 1964. Fortunately for us, other researchers and New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison didn’t ignore them.
The Wrights lived about half-a-block from the JDT crime scene, but the WC didn’t feel it was necessary to call either of them in 1964. In July 1964 a couple researching the assassination, George and Patricia Nash, did an interview with Frank and Mary Wright. The Wright’s house was located a half-a-block east of the shooting at 501 E 10th. Frank Wright, who was nearly a block away, said he saw a man standing over a policeman who had just been shot but he did not see the man with a gun. The man got into a car that was facing in the opposite direction of Wright and he then drove off. Wright described the car as a gray, 1951 Plymouth coupe. He would be the only witness to say the assailant drove off in a car. Mary Wright called the police to report the shooting. It has been said that she too said two men were involved in the shooting, but this is all we really have to go on since the WC, Dallas Police Department (DPD) and the FBI saw fit to ignore them for the most part. Here is what the FBI wrote about the Wrights.
Quote on
…The Wrights…have yet to come forth to volunteer any information concerning this matter, and it is not felt we should interview or interject ourselves into a strictly local murder case wherein our participation was limited to specific requests by the Commission. Further, the information furnished by the Wrights is not subject to verification and would lend undue credence to the Nashs' article which when compared with the over-all findings of the Commission concerning the Tippit murder is filled with inaccurate information. (FBI 62-109090, Section 28, p. 138)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62236#relPageId=138
Quote off
Isn’t it ironic that they didn’t want to interject themselves into the JDT murder because it was local, but they were all over the murder of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) when that too was a local crime? The FBI had no jurisdiction for either crime, but they only worried about jurisdiction when they wanted to ignore witnesses it would seem.
In an article called The Other Witnesses by George and Paticia Nash, Wright said the following thing.
Quote on
I was sitting watching television with my wife. I was sitting in a chair next to the door. I wasn’t but two steps from the door. I heard shots. I knew it wasn’t backfire. I knew it was shots. As soon as I heard them, I went out the door. I could see a police car in the next block. It was toward the end of the next block. I could see it clearly. The police car was headed toward me. It was parked on the south side of the street. In other words, it was parked across the street from our apartment house. I saw a person right by the car. He had fallen down. It seems as if he had just fallen down. He was on the ground, and then he turned over face down. Part of him was under the left front fender of the car. It seems to me that I saw him just as he hit the ground. I saw him turn over and he didn’t move any more.
I looked around to see what had happened. I knew there had been a shooting. I saw a man standing right in front of the car. He was looking toward the man on the ground. He stood there for a while and looked at the man. The man who was standing in front of him was about medium height. He had on a long coat. It ended just above his hands. I didn’t see any gun. He ran around on the passenger side of the police car. He ran as fast as he could go and he got into his car. His car was a grey, little old coupe. It was about a 1950–1951, maybe a Plymouth. It was a grey car, parked on the same side of the street as the police car but beyond it from me. It was heading away from me. He got in that car and he drove away as quick as you could see. He drove down 10th Street, away from me. I don’t know how far he drove. After he got into the middle of the next block between Patton and Crawford, I didn’t look at him any more. There was no one out there except me and that woman when I got there, except for the man I described earlier. I couldn’t figure out who did the shooting. I didn’t see a gun on the man who was standing in front of the car.
…There wasn’t anyone else but the man who drove away and the woman who came down from her porch. I was the first person out. I knew there wasn’t anyone else there at all. It wasn’t any time at all until the ambulance got there. By the time the ambulance got there, there were maybe 25 more people outside. Then after a while, the police came up. I tried to tell two or three people what I saw. They didn’t pay any attention. I’ve seen what came out on television and in the papers but I know that’s not what happened. I know a man drove off in a grey car. Nothing in the world’s going to change my opinion. I saw that man drive off in a grey coupe just as clear as I was born. I know what I saw They can say all they want about a fellow running away, but I can’t accept this because I saw a fellow get in a car and drive away. (Ibid., pp. 141-142)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62236#relPageId=141
Quote off
Who was this man that Frank Wright saw? Was he simply a passerby unwilling to get involved as the writers ask or was he a shooter? If he was simply a passersby, why would the authorities ignore him and this issue all together? It would seem their actions suggest that they suspected him to be more.
Frank Wright was adamant about what he saw and said nothing would change his mind. The article made a good point too about Mrs. Wright calling the police to report the shooting, so why did the DPD NOT seem to know where they lived to question them? Ditto the FBI? For the record—they did NOT say it was Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) that they saw shoot JDT. LHO was NOT wearing a long coat that day. Nor would LHO have the time to just stand there for awhile either as he had a very compact timetable to keep IF you believe the WC's version of events.
In the interview the Nashes also ask Mary Wright what she saw and heard. Here are the relevant portions.
Quote on
…I heard three shots. From my window I got a clear view of a man lying on the street. …I didn’t wait a minute. I ran to the telephone…picked it up and dialed “O.” I said, “Call the police, a man's been shot!” After that I went outside to join my husband. It wasn’t but a minute till the ambulance got there.“ (Ibid., p. 142)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62236#relPageId=142
Quote off
How does an ambulance arrive so fast? The official explanation was that the Dudley Hughes Funeral Home was only two blocks from the scene and an ambulance was dispatched immediately. The call was received at 1:18 PM and the ambulance arrived at Tenth and Patton at 1:18 PM. Does anyone really believe that an ambulance could arrive in sixty-seconds or less in real life? If you don’t then it has to be assumed that it was standing by for a body. This would mean a conspiracy.
gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/wright-article.jpg