Post by Rob Caprio on Apr 24, 2023 19:57:16 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
2.bp.blogspot.com/_I4lZU0BrRsg/TPXTC9aiMQI/AAAAAAAAAEw/uM9589J7_TM/s1600/WarrenComMembers.jpg
nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/02/lee-harvey-oswald-jfk-08.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) assassinated President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. There was no doubt about this in their conclusion written in their Report (WCR).
Sadly, for the American people there is NO supporting evidence for this claim found in the twenty-six volumes of evidence and exhibits. In short, they lied to the American people.
This post will give an example of but one of their many falsehoods.
*************************************************************************
This is what the WC wrote in their report regarding LHO and the murder of JFK.
Quote on
www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/pages/WCReport_0111b.gif
…Shortly after 1:30 a.m. Oswald was brought to the identification bureau on the fourth floor and arraigned before Justice of the Peace Johnston, this time for the murder of President Kennedy. (WCR, p. 198)
www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0111b.htm
Quote off
As we have seen previously in this series there is no evidence supporting the claim that LHO was arraigned for the murder of JFK. In fact, after the District Attorney's office supposedly signed a complaint against LHO for the president's murder at 11:26 p.m., LHO told the press that no one had told him that he was charged with killing the president. How does this happen if their statement is correct?
Much of the FBI's, and Secret Service’s (SS), investigation was reported on in Commission Documents (CDs) and the vast majority of them were kept from the WC’s final report and the accompanying twenty-six volumes of evidence. It would take years before these valuable documents would be released for viewing by the general public.
This is why the WC was so brazen with their falsehoods as they felt confident that the vast majority of the American people either wouldn't take the time to search the twenty-six volumes or would see the CDs.
If they thought that you would see this they may have thought twice about their statement.
Quote on
No arraignment on the murder charges in connection with the death of President KENNEDY was held inasmuch as such arraignment was not necessary in view of the previous charges filed against OSWALD and for which he was arraigned. (CD 5, p. 400)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10406#relPageId=405&tab=page
Quote off
So all the words that the WC spent on this alleged arraignment (see previous posts in this series) there wasn't any arraignment after all according to the November 30, 1963, Gemberling Report (FBI). The WC simply lied about this alleged arraignment.
The FBI mentioned the JDT arraignment as the reason for not having one for the JFK murder, but one would think that LHO would need to be arraigned for each murder as they were separate charges. Furthermore, LHO was not allowed legal representation at the JDT arraignment and this violated his Constitutional rights. Finally, the only legal place to hold arraignments is a court of law and presided over by a judge. The WC claimed they arraigned LHO in a bureau office with a Justice of the Peace presiding. This would also have been in violation of LHO's rights.
Once again, we see evidence that shows that the WC provided us with false information in their report, thus, their conclusion cannot be correct and is sunk again.
2.bp.blogspot.com/_I4lZU0BrRsg/TPXTC9aiMQI/AAAAAAAAAEw/uM9589J7_TM/s1600/WarrenComMembers.jpg
nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/02/lee-harvey-oswald-jfk-08.jpg
The Warren Commission (WC) claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) assassinated President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. There was no doubt about this in their conclusion written in their Report (WCR).
Sadly, for the American people there is NO supporting evidence for this claim found in the twenty-six volumes of evidence and exhibits. In short, they lied to the American people.
This post will give an example of but one of their many falsehoods.
*************************************************************************
This is what the WC wrote in their report regarding LHO and the murder of JFK.
Quote on
www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/pages/WCReport_0111b.gif
…Shortly after 1:30 a.m. Oswald was brought to the identification bureau on the fourth floor and arraigned before Justice of the Peace Johnston, this time for the murder of President Kennedy. (WCR, p. 198)
www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0111b.htm
Quote off
As we have seen previously in this series there is no evidence supporting the claim that LHO was arraigned for the murder of JFK. In fact, after the District Attorney's office supposedly signed a complaint against LHO for the president's murder at 11:26 p.m., LHO told the press that no one had told him that he was charged with killing the president. How does this happen if their statement is correct?
Much of the FBI's, and Secret Service’s (SS), investigation was reported on in Commission Documents (CDs) and the vast majority of them were kept from the WC’s final report and the accompanying twenty-six volumes of evidence. It would take years before these valuable documents would be released for viewing by the general public.
This is why the WC was so brazen with their falsehoods as they felt confident that the vast majority of the American people either wouldn't take the time to search the twenty-six volumes or would see the CDs.
If they thought that you would see this they may have thought twice about their statement.
Quote on
No arraignment on the murder charges in connection with the death of President KENNEDY was held inasmuch as such arraignment was not necessary in view of the previous charges filed against OSWALD and for which he was arraigned. (CD 5, p. 400)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10406#relPageId=405&tab=page
Quote off
So all the words that the WC spent on this alleged arraignment (see previous posts in this series) there wasn't any arraignment after all according to the November 30, 1963, Gemberling Report (FBI). The WC simply lied about this alleged arraignment.
The FBI mentioned the JDT arraignment as the reason for not having one for the JFK murder, but one would think that LHO would need to be arraigned for each murder as they were separate charges. Furthermore, LHO was not allowed legal representation at the JDT arraignment and this violated his Constitutional rights. Finally, the only legal place to hold arraignments is a court of law and presided over by a judge. The WC claimed they arraigned LHO in a bureau office with a Justice of the Peace presiding. This would also have been in violation of LHO's rights.
Once again, we see evidence that shows that the WC provided us with false information in their report, thus, their conclusion cannot be correct and is sunk again.