Post by Rob Caprio on Apr 22, 2024 19:43:51 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYTc1ZjM4NjMtNDJhYS00OGE5LThmNDYtMzNkZWYyOTVhZjFlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQ0NDE5NTA@._V1_.jpg
m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYTMzNDM1OGEtMjk5ZS00NWQ1LWI4ODEtNzFmMjUwYzA5YzA0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQ0NDE5NTA@._V1_.jpg
The Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) was established in 1995 due to the JFK Records Act that had come about due to the reaction of the American people who had seen the movie "JFK" in 1990/1991. The movie had made many come to realize that the official story was not accurate at all, and there were loud calls for action.
The ARRB was setup, but they were not an investigative body, but that was okay because the Warren Commission (WC) and the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) did either no investigating or very little, so this was not a new thing with government bodies and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK).
The ARRB was tasked with locating and retrieving as many documents as possible from the various government agencies who still had them locked up and away from the public. They would also find many documents that were in the hands of average people and in some cases were not even known about until they were given to the ARRB.
The document I will look at in this article is known as MD 41 which was a press conference held at Parkland Hospital (PH) on November 22, 1963, at 3:16 p.m. (CST) involving Doctor Malcolm Perry and Doctor Kemp Clark. This is just a little over two hours after JFK was pronounced dead at PH, so their comments are important here as there would be very little time for manipulation to take place.
Doctor Perry began and would be interrupted numerous times by the press as they were having issues with terms like "moribund" and "midline." He states how he arrived to assist in trying to save JFK's life and noticed two wounds -- one in the neck and one in the head. (MD 41, p. 1) He noted that JFK was in critical condition and resuscitating measures were performed to try and save his life. He was asked to slow down by the press.
He is then asked if these two wounds were from one shot, and he replies that he doesn't know and doesn't want to conjecture. (Ibid.) Why would anyone think these types of wounds would be from one shot? The only possible way they could be connected was if the shooter was on the floor of the limousine and firing upwards at an extreme angle. This was not possible and did not happen.
The press than had issues with "moribund" and "resuscitation" and this had to be explained to them. They were told about the tracheostomy, blood and fluids being administered to JFK. Doctor Clark then speaks about why he was called to the trauma room.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image1.gif
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image2.gif
I was called by Dr. Perry because the President -- because the President had sustained a brain wound. ...It was apparent that the President had sustained a lethal wound.
A missile had gone in or out of the back of his head, causing extensive lacerations and loss of brain tissue. Shortly after I arrived, the patient, the President, lost his heart action by the electrocardiogram, his heart had then stopped.
We attempted resuscitative measures of his heart, including closed chest cardiac massage, but to no avail. (Ibid., pp. 2-3)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image1.htm
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image2.htm
Quote off
Doctor Clark saw a lethal wound to the head. It was a massive wound, and one has to ask how this was possible IF a full metal jacketed (FMJ) bullet was used as claimed by the WC. The type of ammunition supposedly used by Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was designed NOT to cause undue pain and suffering by the rulings of the Geneva Conventions, and it was NOT an explosive type of ammunition. The wound seen by many was caused by a frangible type of bullet and NOT a FMJ bullet. This simple fact shows that LHO was not the shooter of the head wound (and the evidence shows that he was NOT a shooter at all).
He then makes some interesting comments about the wounds.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image2.gif
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image3.gif
Q. Doctor, can you describe the course of the wound through the head?
DR. CLARK: We were too busy to be absolutely sure of the track, but the back of the head.
Q. And through the neck?
DR. CLARK: Principally on his right side, toward the right side. (Ibid., pp. 3-4)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image2.htm
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image3.htm
Quote off
The first thing that should jump out to you is how CONTROLLED this press conference was. The first question above is clear and concise, can you describe the COURSE OF THE WOUND THROUGH THE HEAD, but we get nothing about the course (i.e., track). Doctor Clark evades by saying they were too busy, and I am not disputing that they were, but come on, these doctors were experienced with gun wounds so they could tell BY THE WOUND which way it came through the head. The ONLY reason he did not give a precise answer is because he was told NOT to. This shows that just hours after the assassination the control that was being applied to those involved in this sad saga.
Either the wound in the back of the head was a small one (entry) or a large one (exit) so this is not very complicated for a doctor. He gives us some insight in the direction of the shot to the neck whether he meant to or not as he said it was to the "right side" of the neck and this is the side that faced the Grassy Knoll (GK). IF LHO fired from the southeastern sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) Building as the WC claimed, how could a bullet traveling right to left go RIGHT after it went through the neck? Deflection? If so, they never showed that JFK's spinal column was hit by a bullet so what would make it deflect?
For this reason, and the total lack of evidence for the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory (SBT), his neck wound had to come from either the right front or left front on an angle. Neither of these possibilities align with the TSBD scenario, therefore, it shows how the official narrative did not rely on the what the actual evidence showed.
We then come to the comment by Doctor Perry that would get him in big trouble later on.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image4.gif
Where was the entrance wound?
DR. PERRY: There was an entrance wound in the neck, in regards [sic] [to] the one on the head, I cannot say.
Q. Which way was the bullet coming on the neck wound? At him?
DR. PERRY: It appeared to be coming at him. (Ibid., p. 5)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image4.htm
Quote off
Doctor Perry could NOT have been clearer here -- the neck wound came from the FRONT of the limousine and that excludes LHO even IF he was firing from the TSBD, which he wasn't, so you have a conspiracy based on this simple fact. His honesty here is highly appreciated, but he then dances around the head wound. I could tell if it was an entrance or exit wound and I am not a doctor. A big hole equals an exit wound, and a small wound equals an entry wound. It is not that difficult.
Doctor Clark then tells a whopper of a lie.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image4.gif
DR. CLARK: The head wound could have been either an exit wound from the neck or it could have been a tangent wound, as it was simply a large, gaping loss of tissue.
Q. That was the immediate cause of death -- the head wound?
DR. CLARK: I assume so; yes. (Ibid.)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image4.htm
Quote off
An exit wound from the neck? How in the world would this happen unless the shooter was on the floor of the limousine or in the jump seat in front of JFK? Again, a large, gaping wound is not supposed to happen with FMJ ammunition, so this proves it was a frangible bullet used and LHO had none of this type (actually he had NO ammunition).
He assumes the massive, gaping wound to the head that removed most of JFK's brain was the cause of death? Of course, it was the cause of death as the throat wound was not lethal if it had been treated quickly. Doctor Clark obviously received the memorandum already as he is much more evasive than Doctor Perry.
The press was begging to know if it was two wounds or one and the doctors kept saying they did not know. Who would think a neck wound would come out the back of the head? Apparently, Doctor Perry as he said it was "conceivable" that the two wounds were caused by one bullet. (Ibid., p. 6) Perry told the press that the bullet that entered the throat could have "deviated from its course by striking bone or some other object", but we know this did NOT happen. (Ibid.)
What other object could it have hit since it did not hit the spinal column? Who knows and this is not a possibility anyway.
They did not know if an autopsy would be performed, and they didn't even know if JFK's body was still in PH. It wasn't as the Secret Service (SS) had illegally seized it to take it back to Washington, D.C., when they had NO jurisdiction to do so. This means that IF LHO had lived and went to trial, the body, which is considered the best evidence, would NOT have been allowed in evidence because the SS destroyed the chain of custody. LHO would have walked the first day of the trial.
This goes for all the evidence in this case as the FBI also illegally seized it from the Dallas Police Department (DPD) when they too had NO jurisdiction in the case. It was if they knew there would be NO trial.
The wound in the head was so bad that Doctor Clark said that he did not think there was any possibility of saving JFK's life. (Ibid., p. 8)
This press conference is important as it shows that the neck wound was from the FRONT, and this means that there was at least another shooter (there was more), and that means it was a conspiracy. The massive head wound also tells us that it could not have been caused by a 6.5 mm FMJ bullet because they are not designed to make exploding type wounds.
We also see some control of what these doctors should say in the case as Clark would not tell us much and he was the head of neurosurgery. He had more to lose. Perry admitted several times that the neck wound was an entrance wound.
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of ways to show that the official conclusion is false, and this is one of them.
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYTc1ZjM4NjMtNDJhYS00OGE5LThmNDYtMzNkZWYyOTVhZjFlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQ0NDE5NTA@._V1_.jpg
m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYTMzNDM1OGEtMjk5ZS00NWQ1LWI4ODEtNzFmMjUwYzA5YzA0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQ0NDE5NTA@._V1_.jpg
The Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) was established in 1995 due to the JFK Records Act that had come about due to the reaction of the American people who had seen the movie "JFK" in 1990/1991. The movie had made many come to realize that the official story was not accurate at all, and there were loud calls for action.
The ARRB was setup, but they were not an investigative body, but that was okay because the Warren Commission (WC) and the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) did either no investigating or very little, so this was not a new thing with government bodies and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK).
The ARRB was tasked with locating and retrieving as many documents as possible from the various government agencies who still had them locked up and away from the public. They would also find many documents that were in the hands of average people and in some cases were not even known about until they were given to the ARRB.
The document I will look at in this article is known as MD 41 which was a press conference held at Parkland Hospital (PH) on November 22, 1963, at 3:16 p.m. (CST) involving Doctor Malcolm Perry and Doctor Kemp Clark. This is just a little over two hours after JFK was pronounced dead at PH, so their comments are important here as there would be very little time for manipulation to take place.
Doctor Perry began and would be interrupted numerous times by the press as they were having issues with terms like "moribund" and "midline." He states how he arrived to assist in trying to save JFK's life and noticed two wounds -- one in the neck and one in the head. (MD 41, p. 1) He noted that JFK was in critical condition and resuscitating measures were performed to try and save his life. He was asked to slow down by the press.
He is then asked if these two wounds were from one shot, and he replies that he doesn't know and doesn't want to conjecture. (Ibid.) Why would anyone think these types of wounds would be from one shot? The only possible way they could be connected was if the shooter was on the floor of the limousine and firing upwards at an extreme angle. This was not possible and did not happen.
The press than had issues with "moribund" and "resuscitation" and this had to be explained to them. They were told about the tracheostomy, blood and fluids being administered to JFK. Doctor Clark then speaks about why he was called to the trauma room.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image1.gif
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image2.gif
I was called by Dr. Perry because the President -- because the President had sustained a brain wound. ...It was apparent that the President had sustained a lethal wound.
A missile had gone in or out of the back of his head, causing extensive lacerations and loss of brain tissue. Shortly after I arrived, the patient, the President, lost his heart action by the electrocardiogram, his heart had then stopped.
We attempted resuscitative measures of his heart, including closed chest cardiac massage, but to no avail. (Ibid., pp. 2-3)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image1.htm
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image2.htm
Quote off
Doctor Clark saw a lethal wound to the head. It was a massive wound, and one has to ask how this was possible IF a full metal jacketed (FMJ) bullet was used as claimed by the WC. The type of ammunition supposedly used by Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was designed NOT to cause undue pain and suffering by the rulings of the Geneva Conventions, and it was NOT an explosive type of ammunition. The wound seen by many was caused by a frangible type of bullet and NOT a FMJ bullet. This simple fact shows that LHO was not the shooter of the head wound (and the evidence shows that he was NOT a shooter at all).
He then makes some interesting comments about the wounds.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image2.gif
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image3.gif
Q. Doctor, can you describe the course of the wound through the head?
DR. CLARK: We were too busy to be absolutely sure of the track, but the back of the head.
Q. And through the neck?
DR. CLARK: Principally on his right side, toward the right side. (Ibid., pp. 3-4)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image2.htm
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image3.htm
Quote off
The first thing that should jump out to you is how CONTROLLED this press conference was. The first question above is clear and concise, can you describe the COURSE OF THE WOUND THROUGH THE HEAD, but we get nothing about the course (i.e., track). Doctor Clark evades by saying they were too busy, and I am not disputing that they were, but come on, these doctors were experienced with gun wounds so they could tell BY THE WOUND which way it came through the head. The ONLY reason he did not give a precise answer is because he was told NOT to. This shows that just hours after the assassination the control that was being applied to those involved in this sad saga.
Either the wound in the back of the head was a small one (entry) or a large one (exit) so this is not very complicated for a doctor. He gives us some insight in the direction of the shot to the neck whether he meant to or not as he said it was to the "right side" of the neck and this is the side that faced the Grassy Knoll (GK). IF LHO fired from the southeastern sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) Building as the WC claimed, how could a bullet traveling right to left go RIGHT after it went through the neck? Deflection? If so, they never showed that JFK's spinal column was hit by a bullet so what would make it deflect?
For this reason, and the total lack of evidence for the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory (SBT), his neck wound had to come from either the right front or left front on an angle. Neither of these possibilities align with the TSBD scenario, therefore, it shows how the official narrative did not rely on the what the actual evidence showed.
We then come to the comment by Doctor Perry that would get him in big trouble later on.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image4.gif
Where was the entrance wound?
DR. PERRY: There was an entrance wound in the neck, in regards [sic] [to] the one on the head, I cannot say.
Q. Which way was the bullet coming on the neck wound? At him?
DR. PERRY: It appeared to be coming at him. (Ibid., p. 5)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image4.htm
Quote off
Doctor Perry could NOT have been clearer here -- the neck wound came from the FRONT of the limousine and that excludes LHO even IF he was firing from the TSBD, which he wasn't, so you have a conspiracy based on this simple fact. His honesty here is highly appreciated, but he then dances around the head wound. I could tell if it was an entrance or exit wound and I am not a doctor. A big hole equals an exit wound, and a small wound equals an entry wound. It is not that difficult.
Doctor Clark then tells a whopper of a lie.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/pages/Image4.gif
DR. CLARK: The head wound could have been either an exit wound from the neck or it could have been a tangent wound, as it was simply a large, gaping loss of tissue.
Q. That was the immediate cause of death -- the head wound?
DR. CLARK: I assume so; yes. (Ibid.)
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md41/html/Image4.htm
Quote off
An exit wound from the neck? How in the world would this happen unless the shooter was on the floor of the limousine or in the jump seat in front of JFK? Again, a large, gaping wound is not supposed to happen with FMJ ammunition, so this proves it was a frangible bullet used and LHO had none of this type (actually he had NO ammunition).
He assumes the massive, gaping wound to the head that removed most of JFK's brain was the cause of death? Of course, it was the cause of death as the throat wound was not lethal if it had been treated quickly. Doctor Clark obviously received the memorandum already as he is much more evasive than Doctor Perry.
The press was begging to know if it was two wounds or one and the doctors kept saying they did not know. Who would think a neck wound would come out the back of the head? Apparently, Doctor Perry as he said it was "conceivable" that the two wounds were caused by one bullet. (Ibid., p. 6) Perry told the press that the bullet that entered the throat could have "deviated from its course by striking bone or some other object", but we know this did NOT happen. (Ibid.)
What other object could it have hit since it did not hit the spinal column? Who knows and this is not a possibility anyway.
They did not know if an autopsy would be performed, and they didn't even know if JFK's body was still in PH. It wasn't as the Secret Service (SS) had illegally seized it to take it back to Washington, D.C., when they had NO jurisdiction to do so. This means that IF LHO had lived and went to trial, the body, which is considered the best evidence, would NOT have been allowed in evidence because the SS destroyed the chain of custody. LHO would have walked the first day of the trial.
This goes for all the evidence in this case as the FBI also illegally seized it from the Dallas Police Department (DPD) when they too had NO jurisdiction in the case. It was if they knew there would be NO trial.
The wound in the head was so bad that Doctor Clark said that he did not think there was any possibility of saving JFK's life. (Ibid., p. 8)
This press conference is important as it shows that the neck wound was from the FRONT, and this means that there was at least another shooter (there was more), and that means it was a conspiracy. The massive head wound also tells us that it could not have been caused by a 6.5 mm FMJ bullet because they are not designed to make exploding type wounds.
We also see some control of what these doctors should say in the case as Clark would not tell us much and he was the head of neurosurgery. He had more to lose. Perry admitted several times that the neck wound was an entrance wound.
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of ways to show that the official conclusion is false, and this is one of them.