Post by Rob Caprio on Jan 25, 2019 11:20:55 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
ebuah.uah.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10017/2766/C9S19F1.jpg
Here are some of the following conclusions of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA):
1) Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.
2) The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.
3) The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4) The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5) President John F. Kennedy did not receive adequate protection.
6) The Secret Service was deficient in the performance of its duties.
7) The Secret Service possessed information that was not properly analyzed, investigated or used by the Secret Service in connection with the President's trip to Dallas; in addition, Secret Service agents in the motorcade were inadequately prepared to protect the President from a sniper.
8) The Department of Justice failed to exercise initiative in supervising and directing the investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the assassination.
9) The Federal Bureau of Investigation failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.
10) The Federal Bureau of Investigation was deficient in its sharing of information with other agencies and departments.
11) The Central Intelligence Agency was deficient in its collection and sharing of information both prior to and subsequent to the assassination.
12) The Warren Commission performed with varying degrees of competency in the fulfillment of its duties.
13) The Warren Commission failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.
List compiled from: spartacus-educational.com/JFKschweiker.htm
Clearly we see neither the FBI or the WC adequately investigated the possibility of a conspiracy, thus, how could they claim none existed as they both did? The Secret Service (SS) protection was ruled “inadequate”, but the question is whether this was by accident or design. The HSCA could NOT rule out everyone in the anti-Castro groups or the Mafia from being involved, so again, how can you reach a conclusion saying NO one from those groups were involved? The same goes for the CIA, military intelligence, extreme right-wing groups and the FBI as well as any other group mentioned in the murder of JFK. IF you don’t ELIMINATE people or groups, how do you conclude that one and ONLY one person was involved in the murder of JFK?
Why did the SS not properly analyze or investigate information they had in regard to the Dallas trip? Why did they have NO assistance (i.e. 112th Military Intelligence Group) in protecting the president from sniper fire since they were “inadequately” prepared to do so themselves? Who ordered the 112th to stand down on November 22, 1963?
These are but a few questions that can be asked, but the bottom line is this, the FBI and WC did NOT investigate hardly anything outside LHO, so how could they DEFINITIVELY claim he was the SOLE assassin as they did and be correct? They could not of course, thus, they are sunk yet again. Or as in Senator Schweiker’s words they were a “house of cards that have collapsed.”
ebuah.uah.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10017/2766/C9S19F1.jpg
Here are some of the following conclusions of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA):
1) Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.
2) The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.
3) The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4) The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5) President John F. Kennedy did not receive adequate protection.
6) The Secret Service was deficient in the performance of its duties.
7) The Secret Service possessed information that was not properly analyzed, investigated or used by the Secret Service in connection with the President's trip to Dallas; in addition, Secret Service agents in the motorcade were inadequately prepared to protect the President from a sniper.
8) The Department of Justice failed to exercise initiative in supervising and directing the investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the assassination.
9) The Federal Bureau of Investigation failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.
10) The Federal Bureau of Investigation was deficient in its sharing of information with other agencies and departments.
11) The Central Intelligence Agency was deficient in its collection and sharing of information both prior to and subsequent to the assassination.
12) The Warren Commission performed with varying degrees of competency in the fulfillment of its duties.
13) The Warren Commission failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.
List compiled from: spartacus-educational.com/JFKschweiker.htm
Clearly we see neither the FBI or the WC adequately investigated the possibility of a conspiracy, thus, how could they claim none existed as they both did? The Secret Service (SS) protection was ruled “inadequate”, but the question is whether this was by accident or design. The HSCA could NOT rule out everyone in the anti-Castro groups or the Mafia from being involved, so again, how can you reach a conclusion saying NO one from those groups were involved? The same goes for the CIA, military intelligence, extreme right-wing groups and the FBI as well as any other group mentioned in the murder of JFK. IF you don’t ELIMINATE people or groups, how do you conclude that one and ONLY one person was involved in the murder of JFK?
Why did the SS not properly analyze or investigate information they had in regard to the Dallas trip? Why did they have NO assistance (i.e. 112th Military Intelligence Group) in protecting the president from sniper fire since they were “inadequately” prepared to do so themselves? Who ordered the 112th to stand down on November 22, 1963?
These are but a few questions that can be asked, but the bottom line is this, the FBI and WC did NOT investigate hardly anything outside LHO, so how could they DEFINITIVELY claim he was the SOLE assassin as they did and be correct? They could not of course, thus, they are sunk yet again. Or as in Senator Schweiker’s words they were a “house of cards that have collapsed.”