Post by Rob Caprio on Oct 31, 2019 20:32:43 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other people’s words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
Walt Cakebread has made a lot of claims HE CAN'T SUPPORT, and they all seem to BENEFIT the WC, but he has a pal on here who AGREES with his claims and says they are 100% correct all the while claiming he is a CTer!
Ben Holmes has made many comments about Walt's claims, but NOW denies ever making them and blames me for "editing" when he is the KING of this trick. Then he GOES ON AND SAYS EXACTLY WHAT HE IS CLAIMING TO HAVE NEVER SAID!
Here are some old comments about Walt's list of claims.
“Tis true. You never made them. But also true, each statement is (Walt’s claims).” (Ben Holmes)
And,
“Is it dishonest to point out facts? Which statement (Walt’s claims) above is in error, Rob?" (Ben Holmes)
NOW the first comment Ben lies and claims I am lying for adding "Walt's claims" to it when he changed Walt's name to mine to make it look like I made these ridiculous claims that BENEFIT the WC's theory, and NOT Walt.
Why is he trying to protect Walt all the time? So he is blaming me for "editing" when he later ADMITTED the scenario I just gave.
“The words I QUOTED from you were in DIRECT reference to the list of Walt's claims in one thread.” (Robert)
“No, they weren't. Indeed, anyone who goes to that post, will see *YOUR* claims, not Walt's, immediately above.” (Ben Holmes – 8/1/09)
See his game playing and trickery? HE CHANGED WALT'S NAME TO MINE, and then when he made comments about the claims I have posted and he didn't like them he ACCUSED me of "editing". IS this Warren Commission (WC) shill for real? He DID THE EDITING BY CHANGING WALT'S NAME TO MINE!
Now he may have made a list of claims he claims I made, I don't remember, but why is he NOT posting that list here for us to see?
I know this, I listed Walt's claims and he changed the name to mine, then he made comments about how the list of claims (Walt's) was 100% accurate and true.
He would admit I didn't make them many times BUT STILL CLAIMED THAT THEY WERE 100% ACCURATE!
“Of course you didn't. Yet the *STATEMENTS* are 100% correct. You can't refute 'em.” (Ben Holmes – 8/4/09)
Here we see ANOTHER LIE introduced as he claims I can't refute Walt's silly claims as IF it is my job to do this when WALT CAN'T EVEN SUPPORT THEM WITH EVIDENCE/PROOF!
In the same post Ben said this.
“Each statement (Walt’s claim) is true.” (Ben Holmes – 8/04/09)
We know Walt's claims are bogus BECAUSE HE CAN'T SUPPORT THEM AND THEY MATCH THE SAME CLAIMS THE WC GAVE US, AND BEN AGREES WITH THEM 100%! IF Walt is a WC shill then Ben has to be also!
Let's finish with this lying claim of Ben's regarding Walt's "Shill" status!"
"Walt is a liar who supports the WC!” (Robert)
“Walt isn't the topic, nor have I found him dishonest. He *certainly* doesn't support the WC.” (Ben Holmes)
This is simply ONE WC SHILL PROTECTING ANOTHER WC SHILL. The proof is in the pudding, ONLY LNers go to great lengths to protect each other (they have to since they lie about all the evidence so much), and NO three protect each other on here more than Walt, Ben and Healy.
Why does Ben PROTECT Walt's false claims so much when he said he prefers TRUTH over fellowship?
"Sad to say, Robsie, but I value the truth over agreement.” (Ben Holmes)
Sure you do, that is why you are Walt's LAPDOG AND HEALY IS YOURS!
(Realistically, they are probably the same person as it is quite common for LNers to portray multiple characters.)
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other people’s words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
Walt Cakebread has made a lot of claims HE CAN'T SUPPORT, and they all seem to BENEFIT the WC, but he has a pal on here who AGREES with his claims and says they are 100% correct all the while claiming he is a CTer!
Ben Holmes has made many comments about Walt's claims, but NOW denies ever making them and blames me for "editing" when he is the KING of this trick. Then he GOES ON AND SAYS EXACTLY WHAT HE IS CLAIMING TO HAVE NEVER SAID!
Here are some old comments about Walt's list of claims.
“Tis true. You never made them. But also true, each statement is (Walt’s claims).” (Ben Holmes)
And,
“Is it dishonest to point out facts? Which statement (Walt’s claims) above is in error, Rob?" (Ben Holmes)
NOW the first comment Ben lies and claims I am lying for adding "Walt's claims" to it when he changed Walt's name to mine to make it look like I made these ridiculous claims that BENEFIT the WC's theory, and NOT Walt.
Why is he trying to protect Walt all the time? So he is blaming me for "editing" when he later ADMITTED the scenario I just gave.
“The words I QUOTED from you were in DIRECT reference to the list of Walt's claims in one thread.” (Robert)
“No, they weren't. Indeed, anyone who goes to that post, will see *YOUR* claims, not Walt's, immediately above.” (Ben Holmes – 8/1/09)
See his game playing and trickery? HE CHANGED WALT'S NAME TO MINE, and then when he made comments about the claims I have posted and he didn't like them he ACCUSED me of "editing". IS this Warren Commission (WC) shill for real? He DID THE EDITING BY CHANGING WALT'S NAME TO MINE!
Now he may have made a list of claims he claims I made, I don't remember, but why is he NOT posting that list here for us to see?
I know this, I listed Walt's claims and he changed the name to mine, then he made comments about how the list of claims (Walt's) was 100% accurate and true.
He would admit I didn't make them many times BUT STILL CLAIMED THAT THEY WERE 100% ACCURATE!
“Here we see him ADMIT I never made these claims,… (Robert, Edited by Ben)
“Of course you didn't. Yet the *STATEMENTS* are 100% correct. You can't refute 'em.” (Ben Holmes – 8/4/09)
Here we see ANOTHER LIE introduced as he claims I can't refute Walt's silly claims as IF it is my job to do this when WALT CAN'T EVEN SUPPORT THEM WITH EVIDENCE/PROOF!
In the same post Ben said this.
“Each statement (Walt’s claim) is true.” (Ben Holmes – 8/04/09)
We know Walt's claims are bogus BECAUSE HE CAN'T SUPPORT THEM AND THEY MATCH THE SAME CLAIMS THE WC GAVE US, AND BEN AGREES WITH THEM 100%! IF Walt is a WC shill then Ben has to be also!
Let's finish with this lying claim of Ben's regarding Walt's "Shill" status!"
"Walt is a liar who supports the WC!” (Robert)
“Walt isn't the topic, nor have I found him dishonest. He *certainly* doesn't support the WC.” (Ben Holmes)
This is simply ONE WC SHILL PROTECTING ANOTHER WC SHILL. The proof is in the pudding, ONLY LNers go to great lengths to protect each other (they have to since they lie about all the evidence so much), and NO three protect each other on here more than Walt, Ben and Healy.
Why does Ben PROTECT Walt's false claims so much when he said he prefers TRUTH over fellowship?
"Sad to say, Robsie, but I value the truth over agreement.” (Ben Holmes)
Sure you do, that is why you are Walt's LAPDOG AND HEALY IS YOURS!
(Realistically, they are probably the same person as it is quite common for LNers to portray multiple characters.)