Post by Rob Caprio on Feb 15, 2020 12:45:15 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other peoples' words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
Ben has said this about the Dallas Police Department (DPD) inventory list of the Paine's garage!
“One has DEFINITIVE evidence - an inventory sheet, the other is subjective.” (Ben Holmes)
Why would a supposed CTer call the inventory list of alleged Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) items DEFINITIVE? Did this "CTer" forget or ignore the following?
1) There was an ILLEGAL search of the Paine's garage on Friday, 11/22/63. The DPD found very little, but when they came back with a search warrant on the following day they hit the jackpot! This search warrant and all that was allegedly found, could have been thrown out by the judge on a motion by the defense team as the police got to search and see BEFORE they gave probable cause for the warrant. Imagine how easy it would be to get a warrant IF the police could come in and search your home, office or car BEFORE submitting for a search warrant!
2) NONE of the items listed on the DPD inventory list were ever given a chance to be verified or proven to be LHO's by a defense team, thus, all we have is a claim by the DPD and the Warren Commission (WC) that each item listed did indeed belong to LHO.
3) The list and items on it were given to the FBI BEFORE they were given jurisdiction (Presidential assassination was NOT a federal crime in 1963), thus, the CHAIN OF CUSTODY for said evidence was broken making it all worthless in a court of law.
4) We can add the point that the FBI then TAMPERED with this evidence, a crime, as they altered and deleted items on this list.
This list is NOT definitive in the least, in fact, it is nothing but a fabrication to frame LHO in all likelihood. For a "CTer" to call this list, and other WC evidence, DEFINITIVE shows their true leanings to me.
Will Ben retract his lie and admit this list is NOTHING but a claim?
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other peoples' words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
Ben has said this about the Dallas Police Department (DPD) inventory list of the Paine's garage!
“One has DEFINITIVE evidence - an inventory sheet, the other is subjective.” (Ben Holmes)
Why would a supposed CTer call the inventory list of alleged Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) items DEFINITIVE? Did this "CTer" forget or ignore the following?
1) There was an ILLEGAL search of the Paine's garage on Friday, 11/22/63. The DPD found very little, but when they came back with a search warrant on the following day they hit the jackpot! This search warrant and all that was allegedly found, could have been thrown out by the judge on a motion by the defense team as the police got to search and see BEFORE they gave probable cause for the warrant. Imagine how easy it would be to get a warrant IF the police could come in and search your home, office or car BEFORE submitting for a search warrant!
2) NONE of the items listed on the DPD inventory list were ever given a chance to be verified or proven to be LHO's by a defense team, thus, all we have is a claim by the DPD and the Warren Commission (WC) that each item listed did indeed belong to LHO.
3) The list and items on it were given to the FBI BEFORE they were given jurisdiction (Presidential assassination was NOT a federal crime in 1963), thus, the CHAIN OF CUSTODY for said evidence was broken making it all worthless in a court of law.
4) We can add the point that the FBI then TAMPERED with this evidence, a crime, as they altered and deleted items on this list.
This list is NOT definitive in the least, in fact, it is nothing but a fabrication to frame LHO in all likelihood. For a "CTer" to call this list, and other WC evidence, DEFINITIVE shows their true leanings to me.
Will Ben retract his lie and admit this list is NOTHING but a claim?