Post by Rob Caprio on Oct 28, 2018 17:36:08 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_episode/492728/492728-1591224073206-833e3acd1717c.jpg
This is the final installment in the Wallace Milam review of Gerald Posner’s book “Case Closed” as it pertains to the Parkland Hospital doctors.
******************************************
Wallace Milam continues his review of the claims made by Gerald Posner regarding the Parkland doctors and what they saw in regards to head wounds of President John F. Kennedy (JFK).
Quote on
Dr. Charles Baxter
A. The issue of examination and observation
Dr. Baxter told Posner: "And when we realized he was dead, none of us had the heart to go and examine the head wound while Mrs. Kennedy was in the room. We all just made our way out of the room." (p. 309)
BUT THE RECORD IS QUITE DIFFERENT:
Dr. Baxter failed to mention examination which occurred during the treatment of the President. When he testified before the Warren Commission, Baxter told Arlen Specter:
[after a heartbeat could not be detected] "... we had an opportunity to look at the head wound and saw that the damage was beyond hope..." (6 H 41)
B. The issue of the damaged cerebellum When Baxter testified before the Warren Commission, he said "...the cerebellum was present--a large quantity of brain was present on the cart." (6 H 41)
C. The issue of the location of the head wound
Baxter told Posner: "I have been misquoted enough on this, some saying I claimed the whole back of his head was blown away. That's just wrong. I never even saw the back of his head. The wound was on the right side, not the back. (p. 312)
BUT THE RECORD IS QUITE DIFFERENT:
Within hours of attending the president, Baxter wrote:"...the right temporal and occipital bones were missing and the brain was lying on the table." (CE 392, Warren Report, p. 523)
Baxter was asked to read this same document, which was in his own handwriting, when he testified before the Warren Commission four months later. For some reason, Baxter substituted the term "parietal bones" for "occipital bones" when he read his report to Arlen Specter. "On first observation of the remaining wounds, the temporal and PARIETAL bones were missing and the brain lying on the table..." (6 H 44) In short, for some reason, Baxter read an account, purported to be his own which moved the head wound from the rear to the right side, a location more compatible with the autopsy findings.
Quote off
It is clear to see the evidence on RECORD shows us something TOTALLY DIFFERENT from what the WC, HSCA and Posner would claim. How can the evidence be so wrong in relation to their claims IF the event happened the way we have been told it did happen for nearly FIFTY years? It can’t obviously, so it leaves us with only one other conclusion – the Warren Commission (WC), House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) (except for their last statement regarding a “conspiracy”) and Posner have MISREPRESENTED the evidence to reach their OWN BIASED conclusions.
d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_episode/492728/492728-1591224073206-833e3acd1717c.jpg
This is the final installment in the Wallace Milam review of Gerald Posner’s book “Case Closed” as it pertains to the Parkland Hospital doctors.
******************************************
Wallace Milam continues his review of the claims made by Gerald Posner regarding the Parkland doctors and what they saw in regards to head wounds of President John F. Kennedy (JFK).
Quote on
Dr. Charles Baxter
A. The issue of examination and observation
Dr. Baxter told Posner: "And when we realized he was dead, none of us had the heart to go and examine the head wound while Mrs. Kennedy was in the room. We all just made our way out of the room." (p. 309)
BUT THE RECORD IS QUITE DIFFERENT:
Dr. Baxter failed to mention examination which occurred during the treatment of the President. When he testified before the Warren Commission, Baxter told Arlen Specter:
[after a heartbeat could not be detected] "... we had an opportunity to look at the head wound and saw that the damage was beyond hope..." (6 H 41)
B. The issue of the damaged cerebellum When Baxter testified before the Warren Commission, he said "...the cerebellum was present--a large quantity of brain was present on the cart." (6 H 41)
C. The issue of the location of the head wound
Baxter told Posner: "I have been misquoted enough on this, some saying I claimed the whole back of his head was blown away. That's just wrong. I never even saw the back of his head. The wound was on the right side, not the back. (p. 312)
BUT THE RECORD IS QUITE DIFFERENT:
Within hours of attending the president, Baxter wrote:"...the right temporal and occipital bones were missing and the brain was lying on the table." (CE 392, Warren Report, p. 523)
Baxter was asked to read this same document, which was in his own handwriting, when he testified before the Warren Commission four months later. For some reason, Baxter substituted the term "parietal bones" for "occipital bones" when he read his report to Arlen Specter. "On first observation of the remaining wounds, the temporal and PARIETAL bones were missing and the brain lying on the table..." (6 H 44) In short, for some reason, Baxter read an account, purported to be his own which moved the head wound from the rear to the right side, a location more compatible with the autopsy findings.
Quote off
It is clear to see the evidence on RECORD shows us something TOTALLY DIFFERENT from what the WC, HSCA and Posner would claim. How can the evidence be so wrong in relation to their claims IF the event happened the way we have been told it did happen for nearly FIFTY years? It can’t obviously, so it leaves us with only one other conclusion – the Warren Commission (WC), House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) (except for their last statement regarding a “conspiracy”) and Posner have MISREPRESENTED the evidence to reach their OWN BIASED conclusions.