Post by Rob Caprio on Oct 7, 2020 20:47:46 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2013/11/15/644984b5-e495-4358-be54-795f3c449e77/thumbnail/1240x930/4913502c28318598793b6176cd266034/dallaspolice.jpg
The Warren Commission claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was the lone assassin of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. How did they arrive at this conclusion? Using the evidence? No. Through an extensive investigation? No.
How then? It seems they knew ahead of time who the right man was.
****************************************
How did the Dallas Police Department (DPD) know who the “right man” was so fast?
We have already seen a foreknowledge of LHO being arrested BEFORE he was arrested; a foreknowledge of where he was residing BEFORE they knew where he lived; and a foreknowledge of where he would be arrested BEFORE he was arrested. Now, we can add a foreknowledge of who was meant to be picked up from the outset.
Nothing shows this better than the incident at the Marsalis and Jefferson Streets Library as we see in the DPD radio transcripts. Shortly after the shooting of J.D. Tippit (JDT) the dispatcher sends an alert out for everyone in the area to move to the library since a “suspect” is trapped there.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0450a.gif
Dispatcher (Hulse & McDaniel) Go ahead, 223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker).
223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker) He is in the library, Jefferson, East block 500 block, Marsalis and Jefferson.
Dispatcher (Hulse & McDaniel) What location, 223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker)?
223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker) Library Jefferson and Marsalis…I’m going around back. Get them here fast. (CE 1974, p. 867; p. 71 in original)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0450a.htm
Quote off
This shows us C.T. Walker radioed in that a suspect was in the library and that he was going around the back. His WC testimony tells us what he did when he got to the library.
Mr. BELIN. What did you do then?
Mr. WALKER. I started up cruising the area, and I went up the street that runs north and south and faces the, runs into the library at Jefferson and Marsalis, and I saw a white male running east across the lawn of the library. I was still approximately three - fourths of the block from Jefferson, and he was even south of Jefferson.
Mr. BELIN. How far would he have been from you then when you saw him?
Mr. WALKER. He was over a block….I put out a broadcast on the air that there was a person fitting the description on the air that was seen running in front of the library, and I gave the location and said I will be around at the back. I ran around to the back of the library and other squads then surrounded the library.
Mr. BELIN. What was the description, if you remember, over the radio as to what you were looking for?
Mr. WALKER. A white male, slender build, and had on a light - colored coat or shirt, and that is the best I can recall…About 30 years old, I think he said.
Notice here he says the broadcast had said the man was “about 30 years old” and LHO was NOT 30 years old. Neither was the person he saw running either, but a general description had been transmitted listing the age at 30 years of age.
Mr. BELIN. Then what did you do? Did you go into the library?
Mr. WALKER. As soon as the squads got there, I walked around with the other squads to the west entrance of the building, and we ordered everyone out of the building. They all came out with their hands up.
Mr. BELIN. Was this the upstairs?
Mr. WALKER. No; it is the downstairs. You had to go downstairs to get to it.
Mr. BELIN. Something like a basement?
Mr. WALKER. Yes. It is a semi-basement, I would call it. And everyone came out, and I saw the person that had run in there, and he said that he had ran there to tell the other people about the shooting. And let's see, that he worked there, he told me he worked there and everything. I soon determined he wasn't the one.
How was it determined he was “not the one”? I would really like to know this, but we are never told nor does the WC lawyer ask Walker about this. Why NOT? Simply because he “worked” at the library does NOT mean he could not have shot JDT, so what guideline was the DPD using then?
If we go to another police officer that was involved in this incident we will get some more information. Dallas Police Officer Thomas Hutson testified to the following before the WC.
Mr. HUTSON. I reached over and blew the siren on the squad car to attract the officers' attention, Officers Baggett and Hawkins, and they came running out of the service station and jumped in the car, and I told them to report to, I can't remember, Marsalis and Jefferson, the suspect was seen running across the lawn at the library.
We proceeded south on Beckley to Jefferson, and east on Jefferson to Marsalis, where we hit the ground and searched the area at the library for the suspect who was---a teenager had run across the lawn and into the basement of the library.
At this time, after we found out that this person wasn't involved, we returned to the squad car and began to drive west on Jefferson, west on East Jefferson, and as we approached the 100 block of East Jefferson, the dispatcher said on the radio, that a suspect was just seen entering the Texas Theatre.
Now we see why they thought the person was NOT involved as he was a teenager! Why on earth would Walker confuse a teenager for a 30-year-old man? Was this meant to divert members of the DPD away from the Texaco Station and JDT murder area so the real shooter(s) could get away? Officer Hutson would go on to say this about the “suspect” in the library.
Mr. BELIN. Now the suspect in the library, do you know who he was?
Mr. HUTSON. No; I don't. There were several officers at the location, including some constables from the constable's office in Oak Cliff at Beckley and 12th, and there were four or five persons that came out from the basement with their hands over their head.
One of them was a young boy there, and another officer or two checked him. A sergeant was there.
Mr. BELIN. Was that young boy the one that they thought was a suspect?
Mr. HUTSON. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. Do you know what the young boy said he was doing there?
Mr. HUTSON. No, sir; I didn't interrogate him or talk to him.
Something seems really odd here as again I don’t know how Walker could confuse a teenager (young boy according to Hutson) for a 30-year-old man. What do you think? Officer Walker would confirm the “suspect” was just a boy too in his radio dispatch.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0451b.gif
223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker) That was just a boy running to tell them what happened. He works there. (CE 1974, p. 870; p. 77 in original)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0451b.htm
Quote off
Officer Ray Hawkins makes no mention of the “suspect’s” age, but he corroborated the fact this person’s main fault was for “running” across the lawn of the library! It would seem the simple act of running or looking like you had been running made you guilty of shooting JFK and JDT on November 22, 1963.
Unfortunately for us, Office Baggett was not called by the WC so we can’t get any more details from him. Why were so many units sent to the library all because a person was running across the lawn? What is NOT said is that it was KNOWN that LHO frequented this same library a good bit, so again, the DPD seemed to be checking out places LHO was known to go to. How did they know it was LHO so fast though? Also, how did they know it was NOT the “suspect” seen running across the lawn at the library so fast?
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0451a.gif
19 (C.B. Owens) It was the wrong man. (Suspect at Marsalis library.) (CE 1974, p. 75) (Emphasis added)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0451a.htm
Quote off
Why is Owens using the term “man” when the person was described as a “boy” by two other officers? Furthermore, the confusion continues as the DPD log says “the suspect is under arrest” on page 74, but the officers involved in the library incident said they NEVER ARRESTED the “boy.”
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0450b.gif
Dispatcher (Hulse & McDaniel) Well, they do have the suspect under arrest NOW. (CE 1974, p. 74) (Emphasis added)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0450b.htm
Quote off
For those WC defenders that want to say this is in reference to LHO’s arrest at the TT they should know this CAN’T be true as if we go to page 77 for the first available timestamp AFTER the above dispatch we will see the dispatcher telling Patrolman J.P. Hollingsworth to report to the third floor of the Sheraton Hotel at 1:40 p.m.! This means the dispatch about the suspect being arrested could have taken place as early as 1:37 or in the 1:38 p.m. range! What suspect was this since the boy at the library was NEVER arrested and LHO was NOT arrested until 1:51 p.m.?
Can any WC defender answer these questions for me pertaining to the library incident?
I think we see once again the evidence in the twenty-six volumes of Hearings & Exhibits do NOT agree with the conclusions of the WC, thus, they are sunk once again.
cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2013/11/15/644984b5-e495-4358-be54-795f3c449e77/thumbnail/1240x930/4913502c28318598793b6176cd266034/dallaspolice.jpg
The Warren Commission claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was the lone assassin of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. How did they arrive at this conclusion? Using the evidence? No. Through an extensive investigation? No.
How then? It seems they knew ahead of time who the right man was.
****************************************
How did the Dallas Police Department (DPD) know who the “right man” was so fast?
We have already seen a foreknowledge of LHO being arrested BEFORE he was arrested; a foreknowledge of where he was residing BEFORE they knew where he lived; and a foreknowledge of where he would be arrested BEFORE he was arrested. Now, we can add a foreknowledge of who was meant to be picked up from the outset.
Nothing shows this better than the incident at the Marsalis and Jefferson Streets Library as we see in the DPD radio transcripts. Shortly after the shooting of J.D. Tippit (JDT) the dispatcher sends an alert out for everyone in the area to move to the library since a “suspect” is trapped there.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0450a.gif
Dispatcher (Hulse & McDaniel) Go ahead, 223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker).
223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker) He is in the library, Jefferson, East block 500 block, Marsalis and Jefferson.
Dispatcher (Hulse & McDaniel) What location, 223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker)?
223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker) Library Jefferson and Marsalis…I’m going around back. Get them here fast. (CE 1974, p. 867; p. 71 in original)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0450a.htm
Quote off
This shows us C.T. Walker radioed in that a suspect was in the library and that he was going around the back. His WC testimony tells us what he did when he got to the library.
Mr. BELIN. What did you do then?
Mr. WALKER. I started up cruising the area, and I went up the street that runs north and south and faces the, runs into the library at Jefferson and Marsalis, and I saw a white male running east across the lawn of the library. I was still approximately three - fourths of the block from Jefferson, and he was even south of Jefferson.
Mr. BELIN. How far would he have been from you then when you saw him?
Mr. WALKER. He was over a block….I put out a broadcast on the air that there was a person fitting the description on the air that was seen running in front of the library, and I gave the location and said I will be around at the back. I ran around to the back of the library and other squads then surrounded the library.
Mr. BELIN. What was the description, if you remember, over the radio as to what you were looking for?
Mr. WALKER. A white male, slender build, and had on a light - colored coat or shirt, and that is the best I can recall…About 30 years old, I think he said.
Notice here he says the broadcast had said the man was “about 30 years old” and LHO was NOT 30 years old. Neither was the person he saw running either, but a general description had been transmitted listing the age at 30 years of age.
Mr. BELIN. Then what did you do? Did you go into the library?
Mr. WALKER. As soon as the squads got there, I walked around with the other squads to the west entrance of the building, and we ordered everyone out of the building. They all came out with their hands up.
Mr. BELIN. Was this the upstairs?
Mr. WALKER. No; it is the downstairs. You had to go downstairs to get to it.
Mr. BELIN. Something like a basement?
Mr. WALKER. Yes. It is a semi-basement, I would call it. And everyone came out, and I saw the person that had run in there, and he said that he had ran there to tell the other people about the shooting. And let's see, that he worked there, he told me he worked there and everything. I soon determined he wasn't the one.
How was it determined he was “not the one”? I would really like to know this, but we are never told nor does the WC lawyer ask Walker about this. Why NOT? Simply because he “worked” at the library does NOT mean he could not have shot JDT, so what guideline was the DPD using then?
If we go to another police officer that was involved in this incident we will get some more information. Dallas Police Officer Thomas Hutson testified to the following before the WC.
Mr. HUTSON. I reached over and blew the siren on the squad car to attract the officers' attention, Officers Baggett and Hawkins, and they came running out of the service station and jumped in the car, and I told them to report to, I can't remember, Marsalis and Jefferson, the suspect was seen running across the lawn at the library.
We proceeded south on Beckley to Jefferson, and east on Jefferson to Marsalis, where we hit the ground and searched the area at the library for the suspect who was---a teenager had run across the lawn and into the basement of the library.
At this time, after we found out that this person wasn't involved, we returned to the squad car and began to drive west on Jefferson, west on East Jefferson, and as we approached the 100 block of East Jefferson, the dispatcher said on the radio, that a suspect was just seen entering the Texas Theatre.
Now we see why they thought the person was NOT involved as he was a teenager! Why on earth would Walker confuse a teenager for a 30-year-old man? Was this meant to divert members of the DPD away from the Texaco Station and JDT murder area so the real shooter(s) could get away? Officer Hutson would go on to say this about the “suspect” in the library.
Mr. BELIN. Now the suspect in the library, do you know who he was?
Mr. HUTSON. No; I don't. There were several officers at the location, including some constables from the constable's office in Oak Cliff at Beckley and 12th, and there were four or five persons that came out from the basement with their hands over their head.
One of them was a young boy there, and another officer or two checked him. A sergeant was there.
Mr. BELIN. Was that young boy the one that they thought was a suspect?
Mr. HUTSON. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. Do you know what the young boy said he was doing there?
Mr. HUTSON. No, sir; I didn't interrogate him or talk to him.
Something seems really odd here as again I don’t know how Walker could confuse a teenager (young boy according to Hutson) for a 30-year-old man. What do you think? Officer Walker would confirm the “suspect” was just a boy too in his radio dispatch.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0451b.gif
223 (Patrolman C.T. Walker) That was just a boy running to tell them what happened. He works there. (CE 1974, p. 870; p. 77 in original)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0451b.htm
Quote off
Officer Ray Hawkins makes no mention of the “suspect’s” age, but he corroborated the fact this person’s main fault was for “running” across the lawn of the library! It would seem the simple act of running or looking like you had been running made you guilty of shooting JFK and JDT on November 22, 1963.
Unfortunately for us, Office Baggett was not called by the WC so we can’t get any more details from him. Why were so many units sent to the library all because a person was running across the lawn? What is NOT said is that it was KNOWN that LHO frequented this same library a good bit, so again, the DPD seemed to be checking out places LHO was known to go to. How did they know it was LHO so fast though? Also, how did they know it was NOT the “suspect” seen running across the lawn at the library so fast?
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0451a.gif
19 (C.B. Owens) It was the wrong man. (Suspect at Marsalis library.) (CE 1974, p. 75) (Emphasis added)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0451a.htm
Quote off
Why is Owens using the term “man” when the person was described as a “boy” by two other officers? Furthermore, the confusion continues as the DPD log says “the suspect is under arrest” on page 74, but the officers involved in the library incident said they NEVER ARRESTED the “boy.”
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0450b.gif
Dispatcher (Hulse & McDaniel) Well, they do have the suspect under arrest NOW. (CE 1974, p. 74) (Emphasis added)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0450b.htm
Quote off
For those WC defenders that want to say this is in reference to LHO’s arrest at the TT they should know this CAN’T be true as if we go to page 77 for the first available timestamp AFTER the above dispatch we will see the dispatcher telling Patrolman J.P. Hollingsworth to report to the third floor of the Sheraton Hotel at 1:40 p.m.! This means the dispatch about the suspect being arrested could have taken place as early as 1:37 or in the 1:38 p.m. range! What suspect was this since the boy at the library was NEVER arrested and LHO was NOT arrested until 1:51 p.m.?
Can any WC defender answer these questions for me pertaining to the library incident?
I think we see once again the evidence in the twenty-six volumes of Hearings & Exhibits do NOT agree with the conclusions of the WC, thus, they are sunk once again.