Post by Rob Caprio on Sept 27, 2021 20:15:10 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
i.ytimg.com/vi/JbotLP355fU/maxresdefault.jpg
James Jenkins was studying to be a lab technician at the Bethesda Naval Hospital (BNH) at the time of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK). He was interviewed by members of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) on August 24, 1977. This interview was included in the files of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB).
Jenkins said that he learned of the assassination around 3:30 P.M. while he was in class. Jenkins worked at the BNH morgue and was told by the “Duty Section Chief" to have the morgue ready by 4:15 – 4:30 P.M. Jenkins said that he got there 30-40 minutes before the autopsy.
Jenkins said that he was told not to enter a name as he usually did and later on he saw “C" or “CNC" entered where the name usually was. He then described what he did with the body.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0004a.gif
…he helped put the body on the table and started making the regular markings on the sheet. He recalls describing the scar on the back and the chest incisions on either side. He said he “…only remembers a throat wound which looked like a tracheotomy.” He said he thought it was a tracheotomy “…because it looked like a surgically made incision.” He said he saw a head wound in the “…middle temporal region back to the occipital.” Mr. Jenkins described the back wound as being “…just below the collar to the right of the midline.” (ARRB MD 65, p. 4)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=329#relPageId=4
Quote off
Jenkins, like many others at the autopsy, described wounds that were different from what the final autopsy report and the Warren Commission (WC) claimed. Why did all these people see wounds that were different from what the WC would claim?
Jenkins said that Dr. James Humes attempted to do a back probe, but found that the probe didn’t “…penetrate into the chest.” (Ibid., p. 5) He told the HSCA interviewers that “…with the Warren Commission findings you can understand why I am skeptical.” (Ibid.)
He noted the concern of the doctors in not finding any metal fragments. (Ibid., p. 6) How is this possible if JFK was shot? Jenkins then tells us something else concerning.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0006a.gif
Regarding the autopsy descriptive sheet, Mr. Jenkins recalls that he “…he put in the chest incisions and tracheotomy.” …Mr. Jenkins said that five or six years later he saw a publication which included an autopsy descriptive sheet which he “…didn’t feel was the same one he wrote on.” He said this made him feel very uneasy. Specifically, he “…didn’t believe it was my handwriting.” (Ibid., p. 6)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=329#relPageId=6
Quote off
This is disturbing as it shows that the autopsy descriptive sheet was altered. This means that it cannot be accepted at face value. Who had the power and access to alter this evidence? More on the wounds.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0011a.gif
Jenkins said the back wound was “…very shallow…it didn’t enter the peritoneal (chest) cavity.” He said the wound to the head entered the top rear quadrant from the front side. (Ibid., p. 11)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=329#relPageId=11
Quote off
If we look at the face sheet he drew we see he includes the right rear of JFK's head.
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0016a.gif
How do we balance what he observed, and others too, with what the WC claimed in regard to the wounds seen on the body of JFK? How do we explain the descriptive sheet being tampered with?
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
i.ytimg.com/vi/JbotLP355fU/maxresdefault.jpg
James Jenkins was studying to be a lab technician at the Bethesda Naval Hospital (BNH) at the time of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK). He was interviewed by members of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) on August 24, 1977. This interview was included in the files of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB).
Jenkins said that he learned of the assassination around 3:30 P.M. while he was in class. Jenkins worked at the BNH morgue and was told by the “Duty Section Chief" to have the morgue ready by 4:15 – 4:30 P.M. Jenkins said that he got there 30-40 minutes before the autopsy.
Jenkins said that he was told not to enter a name as he usually did and later on he saw “C" or “CNC" entered where the name usually was. He then described what he did with the body.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0004a.gif
…he helped put the body on the table and started making the regular markings on the sheet. He recalls describing the scar on the back and the chest incisions on either side. He said he “…only remembers a throat wound which looked like a tracheotomy.” He said he thought it was a tracheotomy “…because it looked like a surgically made incision.” He said he saw a head wound in the “…middle temporal region back to the occipital.” Mr. Jenkins described the back wound as being “…just below the collar to the right of the midline.” (ARRB MD 65, p. 4)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=329#relPageId=4
Quote off
Jenkins, like many others at the autopsy, described wounds that were different from what the final autopsy report and the Warren Commission (WC) claimed. Why did all these people see wounds that were different from what the WC would claim?
Jenkins said that Dr. James Humes attempted to do a back probe, but found that the probe didn’t “…penetrate into the chest.” (Ibid., p. 5) He told the HSCA interviewers that “…with the Warren Commission findings you can understand why I am skeptical.” (Ibid.)
He noted the concern of the doctors in not finding any metal fragments. (Ibid., p. 6) How is this possible if JFK was shot? Jenkins then tells us something else concerning.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0006a.gif
Regarding the autopsy descriptive sheet, Mr. Jenkins recalls that he “…he put in the chest incisions and tracheotomy.” …Mr. Jenkins said that five or six years later he saw a publication which included an autopsy descriptive sheet which he “…didn’t feel was the same one he wrote on.” He said this made him feel very uneasy. Specifically, he “…didn’t believe it was my handwriting.” (Ibid., p. 6)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=329#relPageId=6
Quote off
This is disturbing as it shows that the autopsy descriptive sheet was altered. This means that it cannot be accepted at face value. Who had the power and access to alter this evidence? More on the wounds.
Quote on
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0011a.gif
Jenkins said the back wound was “…very shallow…it didn’t enter the peritoneal (chest) cavity.” He said the wound to the head entered the top rear quadrant from the front side. (Ibid., p. 11)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=329#relPageId=11
Quote off
If we look at the face sheet he drew we see he includes the right rear of JFK's head.
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md65/pages/md65_0016a.gif
How do we balance what he observed, and others too, with what the WC claimed in regard to the wounds seen on the body of JFK? How do we explain the descriptive sheet being tampered with?