Post by Gil Jesus on Nov 29, 2021 10:08:33 GMT -5
I don't believe that the rifle was ever shipped. I believe that the paperwork is all faked, that those responsible for the framing of Oswald had a 40" rifle serial number C2766 in their possession and made up the paperwork AFTER the assassination to match the rifle's serial number.
As their evidence, the FBI produced shipping documents that did not include the serial number of the rifle or the carton number that contained it. They produced a money order that was never processed and wasn't deposited and an envelope that was postmarked at a time when Oswald was proven to be at work. They produced a deposit slip for February 13, 1963 and a monthly statement dated 3/15/63 and tried to pass them off as a March deposit. The Postal Service destroyed part 3 of the post office box application in order to hide the fact that the name "A.Hidell" was not on it and thus could not receive the rifle, then lied to the Commission by telling them the destruction was standard procedure.
In order for Oswald to have fired a shot at General Walker in April, they had to have him ordering the rifle from Klein's in March. The only 6.5 Italian rifle Klein's had in stock at that time was the 36" Troop Special. They couldn't have known that there was difference between the rifle they had and the rifle in the advertisement. So they filled out the order form that showed Oswald purchased a 36" rifle but used the same serial number as their 40" Short Rifle, which, according to Louis Feldsott, was sold in June of 1962.
It wasn't necessary for Klein's to be involved in the framing, all they had to do was whatever the FBI requested they do. If the FBI wanted blank order forms, they'd get them. If they wanted order forms filled out or partially filled out, they'd get them. All they had to say was that they wanted them for comparison. Under the circumstances, Klein's would have complied with whatever the FBI wanted.
They could very well have filled out the form and left the control number and the serial number blank. In fact, examination of the Waldman 7 indicates that more than one person filled out the form. The 2's, 5's and 6's are different.
This may have been the reason why Klein's shipping employees were never called to give testimony as to the authentication of the order form bearing the serial number C 2766.
The Klein's "records" were on microfilm. The FBI also had a microfilm machine and could have easily produced the documents.
The FBI could have taken the fake money order to Klein's and used their deposit stamp to stamp it, explaining why although it has the deposit stamp, there is no evidence that it was ever deposited in Klein's account.
The bottom line is that in the business world, you can't have a money order that wasn't processed and wasn't deposited and have a finished sales transaction. Regardless of what the item is, without payment, it's never going to be shipped.
The evidence that it wasn't paid for is the evidence that it was never shipped.
And then there's the fact that if the rifle was shipped it was too large to fit in a post office box.
So who at the Dallas Post Office handed Oswald the rifle ?
Again, this is my opinion based on the evidence I've seen.
As their evidence, the FBI produced shipping documents that did not include the serial number of the rifle or the carton number that contained it. They produced a money order that was never processed and wasn't deposited and an envelope that was postmarked at a time when Oswald was proven to be at work. They produced a deposit slip for February 13, 1963 and a monthly statement dated 3/15/63 and tried to pass them off as a March deposit. The Postal Service destroyed part 3 of the post office box application in order to hide the fact that the name "A.Hidell" was not on it and thus could not receive the rifle, then lied to the Commission by telling them the destruction was standard procedure.
In order for Oswald to have fired a shot at General Walker in April, they had to have him ordering the rifle from Klein's in March. The only 6.5 Italian rifle Klein's had in stock at that time was the 36" Troop Special. They couldn't have known that there was difference between the rifle they had and the rifle in the advertisement. So they filled out the order form that showed Oswald purchased a 36" rifle but used the same serial number as their 40" Short Rifle, which, according to Louis Feldsott, was sold in June of 1962.
It wasn't necessary for Klein's to be involved in the framing, all they had to do was whatever the FBI requested they do. If the FBI wanted blank order forms, they'd get them. If they wanted order forms filled out or partially filled out, they'd get them. All they had to say was that they wanted them for comparison. Under the circumstances, Klein's would have complied with whatever the FBI wanted.
They could very well have filled out the form and left the control number and the serial number blank. In fact, examination of the Waldman 7 indicates that more than one person filled out the form. The 2's, 5's and 6's are different.
This may have been the reason why Klein's shipping employees were never called to give testimony as to the authentication of the order form bearing the serial number C 2766.
The Klein's "records" were on microfilm. The FBI also had a microfilm machine and could have easily produced the documents.
The FBI could have taken the fake money order to Klein's and used their deposit stamp to stamp it, explaining why although it has the deposit stamp, there is no evidence that it was ever deposited in Klein's account.
The bottom line is that in the business world, you can't have a money order that wasn't processed and wasn't deposited and have a finished sales transaction. Regardless of what the item is, without payment, it's never going to be shipped.
The evidence that it wasn't paid for is the evidence that it was never shipped.
And then there's the fact that if the rifle was shipped it was too large to fit in a post office box.
So who at the Dallas Post Office handed Oswald the rifle ?
Again, this is my opinion based on the evidence I've seen.