Post by Rob Caprio on Nov 7, 2018 14:25:14 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
3.bp.blogspot.com/_I4lZU0BrRsg/TPXTI3y8v1I/AAAAAAAAAE4/Hot_KJ7VKdY/s1600/warren.jpg
Governor John Connally's Jacket:
whokilledjfk.net/images/catch_8.jpg
In this series I have shown you countless times where the Warren Commission (WC) blatantly lied about their OWN evidence. Here is another example.
**********************************
As we just saw in the previous post FBI expert Robert Frazier said it was IMPOSSIBLE to tell directions and what kind of ammunition was used due to Governor Connally’s (JBC) jacket, shirt and trousers having been CLEANED AND PRESSED before he examined them.
Mr. SPECTER - Were you able to determine from your examination of the Governor's clothing whether or not they had been cleaned and pressed prior to the time you saw them?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes; they had.
Mr. SPECTER - Is that different from or the same as the condition of the President's clothing which you have just described this morning?
Mr. FRAZIER - It is different in that the President's clothing had not been cleaned. It had only been dried. The blood was dried. However, the Governor's garments had been cleaned and pressed.
Mr. SPECTER - Had the President's clothing been pressed then?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
This means this comment is NOTHING but speculation since he could NOT find copper to prove it.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics observable to formulate a conclusion as to the cause and direction of that hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; there were no characteristics on which you could base a conclusion as to what caused it, whether or not it was a bullet and if it had been, what the direction of the projectile was.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5-mm. bullet coming from the rear of the wearer toward his front?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
We again are left with BIASED SPECULATION due to the cleaning and pressing.
Mr. SPECTER - Referring now to the front side of the Governor's shirt, what, if anything, did you observe with respect to a tear or a hole thereon, as to the body of the shirt?
Mr. FRAZIER - I found in the right chest area of the shirt, considering the shirt when it is being worn, a very irregular tear more or less in the form of an "H," of the letter "H." This tear was approximately 1 1/2 inches in height, with the crossbar tear being approximately 1 inch in width, which caused a very irregularly shaped and enlarged hole in the front of the shirt. The hole is located 5 inches from the right-side seam, and 9 inches below the top of the right sleeve. The 9-inch figure is from the top of the right shoulder where the sleeve adjoins the yoke of the shirt.
Mr. SPECTER - Had that garment been cleaned and pressed, Mr. Frazier, prior to the time you examined it?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics then remaining on the hole on the front side to enable you to formulate an opinion as to the cause of the hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5 millimeter bullet exiting from the chest of the Governor?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, it could.
So why did the WC IGNORE this testimony by their OWN expert witness when they wrote this in their Report on page 96?
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/pages/WCReport_0060b.gif
The cumulative evidence of eyewitnesses, firearms and ballistic experts and medical authorities demonstrated that the shots were fired from above and behind President Kennedy and Governor Connally, more particularly, from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. (WCR, p. 96)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0060b.htm
Quote off
The irony here of course is that the WC admitted they COULDN’T tell direction and what type of bullet was used just pages prior. On page 94 of the Report they wrote the following.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/pages/WCReport_0059b.gif
Each of these holes COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED by a bullet, but a POSITIVE determination of this fact or the DIRECTION of the missile was NOT POSSIBLE because the garment had been cleaned and pressed prior to any opportunity for a scientific examination. (WCR, p. 94) (Emphasis mine)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0059b.htm
Quote off
The above was contained in the first paragraph on the page, but we will see more on this page. In the second paragraph we see the following.
Quote on
Because the shirt had been laundered, there were INSUFFICIENT CHARACTERISTICS for the EXPERT EXAMINER to form a CONCLUSIVE opinion on the DIRECTION or nature of the object causing the holes. (WCR, p. 94) (Emphasis mine)
Quote off
They then concluded that paragraph with this Alice in Wonderland fantasy statement.
Quote on
The rear hole COULD HAVE been caused by the entrance of a 6.5-millimeter bullet and the front hole by the exit of such a bullet. (Emphasis mine)
Quote off
And it COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED by a multitude of other types of bullets too! Especially the ubiquitous .30.30 type.
The evidence, and the admittance of the evidence by the WC, make their conclusion of all shots coming from the sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) a mockery. Murder cases are NOT solved by “maybes” or “could haves”, but rather by evidence and the evidence the WC had in its possession shows us the WC could NOT state with certainty where all the shots came from or what type of ammunition was used to the exclusion of all types of ammunition.
Once again we see the WC’s claims and conclusion are sunk by their OWN evidence.
3.bp.blogspot.com/_I4lZU0BrRsg/TPXTI3y8v1I/AAAAAAAAAE4/Hot_KJ7VKdY/s1600/warren.jpg
Governor John Connally's Jacket:
whokilledjfk.net/images/catch_8.jpg
In this series I have shown you countless times where the Warren Commission (WC) blatantly lied about their OWN evidence. Here is another example.
**********************************
As we just saw in the previous post FBI expert Robert Frazier said it was IMPOSSIBLE to tell directions and what kind of ammunition was used due to Governor Connally’s (JBC) jacket, shirt and trousers having been CLEANED AND PRESSED before he examined them.
Mr. SPECTER - Were you able to determine from your examination of the Governor's clothing whether or not they had been cleaned and pressed prior to the time you saw them?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes; they had.
Mr. SPECTER - Is that different from or the same as the condition of the President's clothing which you have just described this morning?
Mr. FRAZIER - It is different in that the President's clothing had not been cleaned. It had only been dried. The blood was dried. However, the Governor's garments had been cleaned and pressed.
Mr. SPECTER - Had the President's clothing been pressed then?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
This means this comment is NOTHING but speculation since he could NOT find copper to prove it.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics observable to formulate a conclusion as to the cause and direction of that hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; there were no characteristics on which you could base a conclusion as to what caused it, whether or not it was a bullet and if it had been, what the direction of the projectile was.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5-mm. bullet coming from the rear of the wearer toward his front?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
We again are left with BIASED SPECULATION due to the cleaning and pressing.
Mr. SPECTER - Referring now to the front side of the Governor's shirt, what, if anything, did you observe with respect to a tear or a hole thereon, as to the body of the shirt?
Mr. FRAZIER - I found in the right chest area of the shirt, considering the shirt when it is being worn, a very irregular tear more or less in the form of an "H," of the letter "H." This tear was approximately 1 1/2 inches in height, with the crossbar tear being approximately 1 inch in width, which caused a very irregularly shaped and enlarged hole in the front of the shirt. The hole is located 5 inches from the right-side seam, and 9 inches below the top of the right sleeve. The 9-inch figure is from the top of the right shoulder where the sleeve adjoins the yoke of the shirt.
Mr. SPECTER - Had that garment been cleaned and pressed, Mr. Frazier, prior to the time you examined it?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics then remaining on the hole on the front side to enable you to formulate an opinion as to the cause of the hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5 millimeter bullet exiting from the chest of the Governor?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, it could.
So why did the WC IGNORE this testimony by their OWN expert witness when they wrote this in their Report on page 96?
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/pages/WCReport_0060b.gif
The cumulative evidence of eyewitnesses, firearms and ballistic experts and medical authorities demonstrated that the shots were fired from above and behind President Kennedy and Governor Connally, more particularly, from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. (WCR, p. 96)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0060b.htm
Quote off
The irony here of course is that the WC admitted they COULDN’T tell direction and what type of bullet was used just pages prior. On page 94 of the Report they wrote the following.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/pages/WCReport_0059b.gif
Each of these holes COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED by a bullet, but a POSITIVE determination of this fact or the DIRECTION of the missile was NOT POSSIBLE because the garment had been cleaned and pressed prior to any opportunity for a scientific examination. (WCR, p. 94) (Emphasis mine)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0059b.htm
Quote off
The above was contained in the first paragraph on the page, but we will see more on this page. In the second paragraph we see the following.
Quote on
Because the shirt had been laundered, there were INSUFFICIENT CHARACTERISTICS for the EXPERT EXAMINER to form a CONCLUSIVE opinion on the DIRECTION or nature of the object causing the holes. (WCR, p. 94) (Emphasis mine)
Quote off
They then concluded that paragraph with this Alice in Wonderland fantasy statement.
Quote on
The rear hole COULD HAVE been caused by the entrance of a 6.5-millimeter bullet and the front hole by the exit of such a bullet. (Emphasis mine)
Quote off
And it COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED by a multitude of other types of bullets too! Especially the ubiquitous .30.30 type.
The evidence, and the admittance of the evidence by the WC, make their conclusion of all shots coming from the sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) a mockery. Murder cases are NOT solved by “maybes” or “could haves”, but rather by evidence and the evidence the WC had in its possession shows us the WC could NOT state with certainty where all the shots came from or what type of ammunition was used to the exclusion of all types of ammunition.
Once again we see the WC’s claims and conclusion are sunk by their OWN evidence.