Post by Gil Jesus on Jan 23, 2024 8:22:12 GMT -5
Reason # 5. The Warren Commission's own tests proved that its conclusions were false
The rifle tests proved that the rifle could not be the murder weapon.
The wounds ballistics testing proved that Commission Exhibit 399 could not have hit both victims.
Conclusion
My experience in the criminal justice system allows me to see when a case is legitimate and when it is not.
IMO, this case against [Lee Harvey] Oswald was NOT legitimate.
The Dallas prosecutorial system was known for framing innocent people for crimes they did not commit.
This was revealed in 2005 when the Innocence Project of Texas successfully got the newly-elected Dallas DA to look at some convictions of Henry Wade's.
It was found that Wade's office was more interested in convicting the person ARRESTED than the actual perpetrator of the crime.
As a result, 19 of Wade's convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
That means that at least 19 people were framed by the Dallas Police and Dallas DA for crimes they did not commit.
From the continued questioning of Oswald after he "lawyered up", to the unfair police lineups, to the lack of security for the prisoner after receiving death threats, the way the authorities handled Oswald was not consistent with how a normal criminal investigation would have been handled.
It was, however, consistent with how you would handle a case if you were trying to convict an innocent man of a crime he did not commit.
It also was consistent with keeping an innocent man from going to trial and guaranteeing that the "so-called evidence" that he warned his brother not to believe, would never be challenged in court.
The FBI Coverup
Once the FBI, who had no jurisdiction to investigate the crime, took it over, [FBI Director J. Edgar] Hoover covered up the Dallas Police's false arrest and ensured that JFK would never get the justice he deserved.
Hoover even ordered the Dallas FBI to NOT interview certain witnesses who had evidence of Oswald's innocence.
gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/no-interview-clemons-wrights.png
The FBI also lied in their reports about what the witnesses said. When asked under oath, witnesses testified that they never said what the FBI reports said they said.
That doesn't happen in a normal criminal investigation. All witness statements and affidavits are complete, concise and correct.
The crime scenes were not secured and adequately processed. This doesn't happen in a normal criminal investigation. The crime scenes should have remained secured until their processing was complete.
Evidence was not properly secured. This doesn't happen in a normal criminal investigation. Evidence placed in envelopes should have been sealed to avoid tampering and maintain the integrity of the evidence.
And therein lies the smoking gun: the way the authorities handled the case is evidence that Oswald was not guilty.
1. The fact that the prosecutorial system in Dallas was corrupt.
2. The way the authorities handled the defendant (Oswald).
3. The way the authorities handled the evidence.
4. The way the authorities handled the witnesses.
The actions of the authorities were simply not consistent with how a normal criminal investigation, which was expected to go to trial, would have been handled. PERIOD.
All of the reasons I've noted add up to a murder case where the suspect is innocent, and the evidence has been tampered with in order to frame him for a crime he did not commit.
Oswald was a dead man the second he was arrested in the Texas Theater. The framing of him as President [John F.] Kennedy's assassin and the mainstream media's acceptance of it continues to be a national disgrace.
A Final Thought
To its credit, the foreign press was the first to see and report the truth: this was a political murder, and the motive was political. The assassination of President Kennedy returned the power of the Presidency to the right-wing power elite that controlled it prior to the 1960 election.
This was not the work of a foreign power, this was the work of a domestic conspiracy.
There was only one organization with the power to pull it off.
One organization with allies in the Secret Service, the US Military and the Dallas Police.
One organization behind the training camps where Cuban gunmen could train.
One organization whose track record included assassinations of heads of state.
And an organization who had the power over the FBI via its blackmailing of Hoover.
This was not a mafia killing.
Jim Garrison was right. This murder was orchestrated by the CIA. I believe that the gunmen were Cuban exiles opposed to Kennedy's policies on Cuba. The CIA's allies in the Secret Service facilitated the killing and it was sanctioned by the US Military.
This was a countercoup designed to return the power of the Presidency to the elitists who had it prior to the 1960 election.
It's Time to Release the Remaining Files
Over the last 60+ years, more and more evidence has been released indicating that the CIA was behind the assassination.
It's time to release the remaining CIA records and let us see if they reveal any connections between the CIA and persons in this case like Ruth Paine, Roy Truly, Warren Caster, Jack Ruby or others, including Oswald.
Maybe then we can be able to unravel the truth and give the Kennedy family they closure they deserve.
The rifle tests proved that the rifle could not be the murder weapon.
The wounds ballistics testing proved that Commission Exhibit 399 could not have hit both victims.
Conclusion
My experience in the criminal justice system allows me to see when a case is legitimate and when it is not.
IMO, this case against [Lee Harvey] Oswald was NOT legitimate.
The Dallas prosecutorial system was known for framing innocent people for crimes they did not commit.
This was revealed in 2005 when the Innocence Project of Texas successfully got the newly-elected Dallas DA to look at some convictions of Henry Wade's.
It was found that Wade's office was more interested in convicting the person ARRESTED than the actual perpetrator of the crime.
As a result, 19 of Wade's convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
That means that at least 19 people were framed by the Dallas Police and Dallas DA for crimes they did not commit.
From the continued questioning of Oswald after he "lawyered up", to the unfair police lineups, to the lack of security for the prisoner after receiving death threats, the way the authorities handled Oswald was not consistent with how a normal criminal investigation would have been handled.
It was, however, consistent with how you would handle a case if you were trying to convict an innocent man of a crime he did not commit.
It also was consistent with keeping an innocent man from going to trial and guaranteeing that the "so-called evidence" that he warned his brother not to believe, would never be challenged in court.
The FBI Coverup
Once the FBI, who had no jurisdiction to investigate the crime, took it over, [FBI Director J. Edgar] Hoover covered up the Dallas Police's false arrest and ensured that JFK would never get the justice he deserved.
Hoover even ordered the Dallas FBI to NOT interview certain witnesses who had evidence of Oswald's innocence.
gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/no-interview-clemons-wrights.png
The FBI also lied in their reports about what the witnesses said. When asked under oath, witnesses testified that they never said what the FBI reports said they said.
That doesn't happen in a normal criminal investigation. All witness statements and affidavits are complete, concise and correct.
The crime scenes were not secured and adequately processed. This doesn't happen in a normal criminal investigation. The crime scenes should have remained secured until their processing was complete.
Evidence was not properly secured. This doesn't happen in a normal criminal investigation. Evidence placed in envelopes should have been sealed to avoid tampering and maintain the integrity of the evidence.
And therein lies the smoking gun: the way the authorities handled the case is evidence that Oswald was not guilty.
1. The fact that the prosecutorial system in Dallas was corrupt.
2. The way the authorities handled the defendant (Oswald).
3. The way the authorities handled the evidence.
4. The way the authorities handled the witnesses.
The actions of the authorities were simply not consistent with how a normal criminal investigation, which was expected to go to trial, would have been handled. PERIOD.
All of the reasons I've noted add up to a murder case where the suspect is innocent, and the evidence has been tampered with in order to frame him for a crime he did not commit.
Oswald was a dead man the second he was arrested in the Texas Theater. The framing of him as President [John F.] Kennedy's assassin and the mainstream media's acceptance of it continues to be a national disgrace.
A Final Thought
To its credit, the foreign press was the first to see and report the truth: this was a political murder, and the motive was political. The assassination of President Kennedy returned the power of the Presidency to the right-wing power elite that controlled it prior to the 1960 election.
This was not the work of a foreign power, this was the work of a domestic conspiracy.
There was only one organization with the power to pull it off.
One organization with allies in the Secret Service, the US Military and the Dallas Police.
One organization behind the training camps where Cuban gunmen could train.
One organization whose track record included assassinations of heads of state.
And an organization who had the power over the FBI via its blackmailing of Hoover.
This was not a mafia killing.
Jim Garrison was right. This murder was orchestrated by the CIA. I believe that the gunmen were Cuban exiles opposed to Kennedy's policies on Cuba. The CIA's allies in the Secret Service facilitated the killing and it was sanctioned by the US Military.
This was a countercoup designed to return the power of the Presidency to the elitists who had it prior to the 1960 election.
It's Time to Release the Remaining Files
Over the last 60+ years, more and more evidence has been released indicating that the CIA was behind the assassination.
It's time to release the remaining CIA records and let us see if they reveal any connections between the CIA and persons in this case like Ruth Paine, Roy Truly, Warren Caster, Jack Ruby or others, including Oswald.
Maybe then we can be able to unravel the truth and give the Kennedy family they closure they deserve.