Post by Rob Caprio on Feb 5, 2024 20:36:33 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
dmn-dallas-news-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com/resizer/BF6fC1t4iY7Uuyb76zf1VPkPLHY=/1660x934/smart/filters:no_upscale()/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-dmn.s3.amazonaws.com/public/T5LCWD2WIDHF6SYHYYXKMMNQFQ.jpg
i.ytimg.com/vi/8cTh5waZ_w0/hqdefault.jpg
The Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) was established in 1995 as a result of the 1992 JFK Act which was passed by the U.S. Congress due to the outcry following the release of the movie "JFK" in 1991. Their main goal was to locate as many official documents as possible and get them released for the public to review.
They were not an investigative body so the fact that defenders of the official conclusion (i.e., the Warren Commission (WC)) claim that they supported the findings of the WC is irrelevant. They did no investigation, but rather sought to find and disclose as many documents as possible during their tenure.
Another thing to keep in mind, is the fact they were created because the majority of Americans did NOT support the conclusion of the WC and to a great extent the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), thus, it would be odd if they just supported the WC's conclusion as the WC defenders claim.
They did some interviews in the area of the supposed autopsy of President John F. Kennedy (JFK), but they mostly relied on interviews and testimony of both the WC and HSCA for the most part. In the case of this post, they used a report by Patricia Hutton who had been a nurse at the Parkland Memorial Hospital (PH) on November 22, 1963, and took part in the life-saving attempts on JFK by the hospital staff when he was brought in with very serious wounds. She would get a good look at the body of JFK and noted important things that ran counter to what the WC would later tell us in their report, and this is why she was never called to testify most likely.
A lot of the WC defenders say that all of the witnesses that were at PH and who say there was a massive wound in the right-rear of JFK's head are "mistaken." How do they prove that around 40 professionals are wrong in their observations? They don't. They ignore these people like the plague and focus only on the rigged autopsy for their "proof."
Patricia Hutton worked at PH as a nurse, and she was on duty when JFK was brought into the hospital. Her observation of the wound is IMPOSSIBLE TO REFUTE as she was told to put pressure on the wound to try and stop the bleeding. How could a nurse place pressure on a wound, and then completely forget where it was. It’s not going to happen.
Here is her statement of this event.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/pages/WH_Vol21_0120b.gif
ACTIVITIES OF PAT HUTTON ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963
I came back from lunch and went to the O.B.-Gynecology section where I was working. At approximately 12:30 P.M., the triage nurse called us to bring a cart out to the entrance. We took said cart out the door, and it was then that I realized who was in the car.
Several people helped put the President on the cart, and we then proceeded to the Major Surgery section of the Emergency Room to Trauma Room #1. Mr. Kennedy was bleeding profusely from a wound on the back of his head, and was lying there unresponsive. As soon as we reached the room, a doctor placed an endotracheal tube, and prepared for a tracheostomy. Within a few minutes, there were numerous doctors in the room starting I.V.'s, placing chest tubes and anesthesia with O2. A doctor asked me to place a pressure dressing on the head wound. This was of no use, however, because of the massive opening on the back of the head.
Blood was pumped in along with the I.V.'s running. After a period of handing instruments and equipment to the doctors as needed, it was announced that the President had expired. We then removed the tubes and I.V.'s from him. Mrs. Kennedy came in with a priest, and last rites were performed. When Mrs. Kennedy left, we removed all of the equipment from the room, and I then left at the request of the supervisor to get a plastic cover to line the coffin. I returned with it, and Mr. Kennedy was placed in the coffin to await orders to move him by ambulance. After that, I stood outside the door with Mrs. Nelson until the body was removed. When the area was clear, another nurse and I went up to the dining room for coffee. We returned to the Emergency Room where I changed clothes, and left at approximately 4:00P.M. for home.
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1963
I arrived for work at 9:30 A.M., and was told that our names had been released, and to check with administration before talking with anyone.
I was not asked any questions by anyone, and spent an uneventful 8 hours on duty.
Patricia B. Hutton, R.N. (Price Exhibit, WC XXI, p. 216; ARRB MD 99, p. 1)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/html/WH_Vol21_0120b.htm
Quote off
Why would NO one be interested in asking her questions about what she saw? Why was the WC not interested in what she had to say? Because it did NOT match the official fairy tale being created would be the most likely answer.
She put pressure on the wound, therefore, she had to know where it was located. This made her persona non grata to the WC. Patricia Hutton was an important witness and fortunately the ARRB at least tried to conduct an interview with her on March 17, 1997, but she refused. She said that everything that she put in the statement was all that she had to say on the matter.
Perhaps if the WC had called her to testify we may have garnered additional information from her in 1964, but they avoided her like the plague. Another consideration is that by 1997 she had to have taken notice of all the deaths involving witnesses who had observed and heard things that went counter to the WC's conclusion. She could have been just afraid to talk with the ARRB and who can blame her?
Hutton, along with many others, saw a massive wound in the right-rear of JFK's head and the WC claimed that only a small entry wound was located there. She was a firsthand witness to the actual head wound and to the fact that the WC outright lied to the American people to cover-up what actually occurred on November 22, 1963. It isn't hard to understand why she was afraid to say anything else.
chorus.stimg.co/23760368/merlin_44772047.jpg
dmn-dallas-news-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com/resizer/BF6fC1t4iY7Uuyb76zf1VPkPLHY=/1660x934/smart/filters:no_upscale()/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-dmn.s3.amazonaws.com/public/T5LCWD2WIDHF6SYHYYXKMMNQFQ.jpg
i.ytimg.com/vi/8cTh5waZ_w0/hqdefault.jpg
The Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) was established in 1995 as a result of the 1992 JFK Act which was passed by the U.S. Congress due to the outcry following the release of the movie "JFK" in 1991. Their main goal was to locate as many official documents as possible and get them released for the public to review.
They were not an investigative body so the fact that defenders of the official conclusion (i.e., the Warren Commission (WC)) claim that they supported the findings of the WC is irrelevant. They did no investigation, but rather sought to find and disclose as many documents as possible during their tenure.
Another thing to keep in mind, is the fact they were created because the majority of Americans did NOT support the conclusion of the WC and to a great extent the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), thus, it would be odd if they just supported the WC's conclusion as the WC defenders claim.
They did some interviews in the area of the supposed autopsy of President John F. Kennedy (JFK), but they mostly relied on interviews and testimony of both the WC and HSCA for the most part. In the case of this post, they used a report by Patricia Hutton who had been a nurse at the Parkland Memorial Hospital (PH) on November 22, 1963, and took part in the life-saving attempts on JFK by the hospital staff when he was brought in with very serious wounds. She would get a good look at the body of JFK and noted important things that ran counter to what the WC would later tell us in their report, and this is why she was never called to testify most likely.
A lot of the WC defenders say that all of the witnesses that were at PH and who say there was a massive wound in the right-rear of JFK's head are "mistaken." How do they prove that around 40 professionals are wrong in their observations? They don't. They ignore these people like the plague and focus only on the rigged autopsy for their "proof."
Patricia Hutton worked at PH as a nurse, and she was on duty when JFK was brought into the hospital. Her observation of the wound is IMPOSSIBLE TO REFUTE as she was told to put pressure on the wound to try and stop the bleeding. How could a nurse place pressure on a wound, and then completely forget where it was. It’s not going to happen.
Here is her statement of this event.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/pages/WH_Vol21_0120b.gif
ACTIVITIES OF PAT HUTTON ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963
I came back from lunch and went to the O.B.-Gynecology section where I was working. At approximately 12:30 P.M., the triage nurse called us to bring a cart out to the entrance. We took said cart out the door, and it was then that I realized who was in the car.
Several people helped put the President on the cart, and we then proceeded to the Major Surgery section of the Emergency Room to Trauma Room #1. Mr. Kennedy was bleeding profusely from a wound on the back of his head, and was lying there unresponsive. As soon as we reached the room, a doctor placed an endotracheal tube, and prepared for a tracheostomy. Within a few minutes, there were numerous doctors in the room starting I.V.'s, placing chest tubes and anesthesia with O2. A doctor asked me to place a pressure dressing on the head wound. This was of no use, however, because of the massive opening on the back of the head.
Blood was pumped in along with the I.V.'s running. After a period of handing instruments and equipment to the doctors as needed, it was announced that the President had expired. We then removed the tubes and I.V.'s from him. Mrs. Kennedy came in with a priest, and last rites were performed. When Mrs. Kennedy left, we removed all of the equipment from the room, and I then left at the request of the supervisor to get a plastic cover to line the coffin. I returned with it, and Mr. Kennedy was placed in the coffin to await orders to move him by ambulance. After that, I stood outside the door with Mrs. Nelson until the body was removed. When the area was clear, another nurse and I went up to the dining room for coffee. We returned to the Emergency Room where I changed clothes, and left at approximately 4:00P.M. for home.
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1963
I arrived for work at 9:30 A.M., and was told that our names had been released, and to check with administration before talking with anyone.
I was not asked any questions by anyone, and spent an uneventful 8 hours on duty.
Patricia B. Hutton, R.N. (Price Exhibit, WC XXI, p. 216; ARRB MD 99, p. 1)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/html/WH_Vol21_0120b.htm
Quote off
Why would NO one be interested in asking her questions about what she saw? Why was the WC not interested in what she had to say? Because it did NOT match the official fairy tale being created would be the most likely answer.
She put pressure on the wound, therefore, she had to know where it was located. This made her persona non grata to the WC. Patricia Hutton was an important witness and fortunately the ARRB at least tried to conduct an interview with her on March 17, 1997, but she refused. She said that everything that she put in the statement was all that she had to say on the matter.
Perhaps if the WC had called her to testify we may have garnered additional information from her in 1964, but they avoided her like the plague. Another consideration is that by 1997 she had to have taken notice of all the deaths involving witnesses who had observed and heard things that went counter to the WC's conclusion. She could have been just afraid to talk with the ARRB and who can blame her?
Hutton, along with many others, saw a massive wound in the right-rear of JFK's head and the WC claimed that only a small entry wound was located there. She was a firsthand witness to the actual head wound and to the fact that the WC outright lied to the American people to cover-up what actually occurred on November 22, 1963. It isn't hard to understand why she was afraid to say anything else.