Post by Rob Caprio on Mar 12, 2024 20:17:49 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
Notice To Lurkers:
Allegedly “Ben Holmes” will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer [WC defenders] clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other people’s words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Allegedly “Ben Holmes” will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this. He will also resort to mass snipping and editing to hide his lies! He is a NOW a man who ENDORSES CENSORSHIP as he removes YOUR words!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's add in Allegedly “Ben Holmes” own notice to lurkers for his series as he is DOING THE SAME THING HE ACCUSES THE TROLLS OF DOING!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Allegedly “Ben Holmes’” refrain on his “series” posts.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My response to Allegedly “Ben Holmes’” slander:
“The newest troll is "Rob Caprio" - who is sort of a reverse troll, claiming to be a CT'er - but only going after other CT'ers. Watch for his comments on these questions.” (Allegedly “Ben Holmes” — Various Series Post Refrain)
Yet BEFORE I started to point out his WC supporting LIES he said I was NOT a troll!
“I appreciate that...When trolls do it, I can simply killfile 'em - but you don't fit in the troll category - so it's particularly irritating...thanks.” (Allegedly “Ben Holmes” – 5/20/08)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben continues to lie about so much! He has told this lie just yesterday!
Quote on
Day's claim is NOT equal to the real evidence Latona gave us! (Robert)
Didn't say that, stupid. (Ben Holmes – 10/6/09)
Quote off
BUT he did say this awhile back in his rush to defend his "pal" Walt!
Quote on
That is NOT on par with the lies of Walt when he claims there was a "smudged print on the wooden foregrip" and that Lt. Day did a lift when the testimony of FBI expert (and Day mentor) refutes all this. (Robert)
A conflict in evidence merely means you have to select that which is most persuasive. **Walt can EQUALLY claim you're lying because Lt. Day testified to the lift**.” (Ben Holmes – 7/15/09)
Quote off
Lt. Day's "testimony" is NOTHING but a claim, and one that is NOT supported by any evidence! He even refused to sign an affidavit for the FBI outlining how he discovered the "palmprint" and how he lifted it. There is NOT one shred of evidence that shows Lt. Day did what he claimed. In fact, the three participants don't even agree on the claim of the lift.
The WC said the lift was "so complete" it removed the palmprint fully. Lt. Day said he could still SEE the palmprint after he did the lift. Sebastian Latona (FBI veteran who taught classes on this subject that were attended by Day) said he SAW NO INDICATION OF A LIFT and also did NOT believe the rifle had been "processed" when he got it. (Part of processing is dusting for prints and doing lifts.)
So, Ben is saying Lt. Day's claim is EQUAL to Latona's tests as he said this to me.
Quote on
**Walt can EQUALLY claim you're lying because Lt. Day testified to the lift**. (Ben Holmes – 7/15/09)
Quote off
We KNOW that Ben KNOWS that Day's testimony is JUST A CLAIM BECAUSE HE TOLD US SO AWHILE AGO!
Quote on
We have a right palm print on the stock,… (Ed Cage, edited by Ben)
Actually, **we have the *claim* of a right palm print on the stock**. (Ben Holmes – 1/18/07)
Quote off
Surely the argument his "pal" Walt is making (print on the wooden foregrip) would just be a "claim" too!
Once again, we see Ben's OWN WORDS show us what a liar he is. We have another lie that has been proven.
Notice To Lurkers:
Allegedly “Ben Holmes” will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer [WC defenders] clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other people’s words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Allegedly “Ben Holmes” will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this. He will also resort to mass snipping and editing to hide his lies! He is a NOW a man who ENDORSES CENSORSHIP as he removes YOUR words!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's add in Allegedly “Ben Holmes” own notice to lurkers for his series as he is DOING THE SAME THING HE ACCUSES THE TROLLS OF DOING!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Allegedly “Ben Holmes’” refrain on his “series” posts.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My response to Allegedly “Ben Holmes’” slander:
“The newest troll is "Rob Caprio" - who is sort of a reverse troll, claiming to be a CT'er - but only going after other CT'ers. Watch for his comments on these questions.” (Allegedly “Ben Holmes” — Various Series Post Refrain)
Yet BEFORE I started to point out his WC supporting LIES he said I was NOT a troll!
“I appreciate that...When trolls do it, I can simply killfile 'em - but you don't fit in the troll category - so it's particularly irritating...thanks.” (Allegedly “Ben Holmes” – 5/20/08)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben continues to lie about so much! He has told this lie just yesterday!
Quote on
Day's claim is NOT equal to the real evidence Latona gave us! (Robert)
Didn't say that, stupid. (Ben Holmes – 10/6/09)
Quote off
BUT he did say this awhile back in his rush to defend his "pal" Walt!
Quote on
That is NOT on par with the lies of Walt when he claims there was a "smudged print on the wooden foregrip" and that Lt. Day did a lift when the testimony of FBI expert (and Day mentor) refutes all this. (Robert)
A conflict in evidence merely means you have to select that which is most persuasive. **Walt can EQUALLY claim you're lying because Lt. Day testified to the lift**.” (Ben Holmes – 7/15/09)
Quote off
Lt. Day's "testimony" is NOTHING but a claim, and one that is NOT supported by any evidence! He even refused to sign an affidavit for the FBI outlining how he discovered the "palmprint" and how he lifted it. There is NOT one shred of evidence that shows Lt. Day did what he claimed. In fact, the three participants don't even agree on the claim of the lift.
The WC said the lift was "so complete" it removed the palmprint fully. Lt. Day said he could still SEE the palmprint after he did the lift. Sebastian Latona (FBI veteran who taught classes on this subject that were attended by Day) said he SAW NO INDICATION OF A LIFT and also did NOT believe the rifle had been "processed" when he got it. (Part of processing is dusting for prints and doing lifts.)
So, Ben is saying Lt. Day's claim is EQUAL to Latona's tests as he said this to me.
Quote on
**Walt can EQUALLY claim you're lying because Lt. Day testified to the lift**. (Ben Holmes – 7/15/09)
Quote off
We KNOW that Ben KNOWS that Day's testimony is JUST A CLAIM BECAUSE HE TOLD US SO AWHILE AGO!
Quote on
We have a right palm print on the stock,… (Ed Cage, edited by Ben)
Actually, **we have the *claim* of a right palm print on the stock**. (Ben Holmes – 1/18/07)
Quote off
Surely the argument his "pal" Walt is making (print on the wooden foregrip) would just be a "claim" too!
Once again, we see Ben's OWN WORDS show us what a liar he is. We have another lie that has been proven.