Post by Rob Caprio on Jun 3, 2024 19:53:41 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2025
cdn.aarp.net/content/dam/aarp/entertainment/television/2018/04/1140-bobby-kennedy-1968.web.jpg
media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/210827193559-02-robert-kennedy-assassination-file-restricted.jpg
i0.wp.com/robscholtemuseum.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/RFK-Girl-in-Polka-Dot-Dress-Sirhan-Sirhan-In-Ambassador-Hotel-the-Night-of-the-Shooting-foto-Gary-Revel.jpg
i.pinimg.com/originals/60/47/f1/6047f109a7064790e10a9ef9294bb862.jpg
The official story is that a lone shooter named Sirhan Sirhan shot and eventually killed Senator Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) on June 4, 1968, with an Iver Johnson Cadet .22-caliber revolver. The revolver held eight rounds and they said that Sirhan had fired all eight.
He did, but the problem was that there was evidence showing that more than eight rounds had been fired and this means a second gun was involved. This would be hidden for decades by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the government. RFK was also killed by a shot from behind his head and Sirhan was never behind him.
"Sirhan" was seen in the company of a woman (or women) in the weeks leading up to the assassination and I put his name in quotes because like Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) we cannot be sure if it was the Sirhan of fame or a man who looked like him. Either way, this issue would show that there was a conspiracy afoot and that is why these sightings never garnered much interest by the LAPD. They looked to downplay them instead.
The first sighting occurred on May 20, 1968, at "Robbie's Restaurant" in Pomona, California, where RFK had a luncheon planned. The luncheon was held on the second floor of the restaurant and that is how the sighting occurred. Officer William Schneid was stationed at the foot of the stairway to hold back the crowd so that they couldn't go upstairs where RFK was.
He would see a woman and man who resembled Sirhan before RFK went upstairs and this was recounted in a LAPD report. Here is the relevant information.
Quote on
...Prior to Senator Kennedy and his part ascending the staircase to the second floor, he recalls seeing a girl in her mid-twenties, standing by the kitchen door on the west side of the corridor. It was Schneid's recollection that this girl was apparently trying to enter the kitchen. Schneid told her she could not enter the kitchen. Schneid recalled the girl asking him which way Senator Kennedy was coming in, and he told her, probably up the staircase to the second floor.
Schneid related that when the Kennedy party did ascend the staircase that Senator Kennedy paused midway, pointed at Schneid and said, "officer, let them through." Schneid said that Kennedy referred to the people in the aisle that Schneid was holding back. When Senator Kennedy said this, the crowd surged toward the foot of the stairs and he stepped back.
Schneid recalled that the aforementioned girl bolted toward the area at the foot of the stairs and moved into a booth area on the north side of the staircase instead of trying to ascend the stairs. It was Schneid's impression that she was trying to reach someone she might have recognized.
Possibly a moment later Schneid saw the same girl on the staircase. It was his impression that someone might have assisted her over the brick facade adjacent to the staircase and over the stair railing behind the persons who were checking for admission tickets... Schneid said he never saw the girl again.
He described the girl in question as female, Caucasian, mid-twenties, 5-4 to 5-7, 110 to 125 pounds, medium to light brown hair, bouffant style on top, close-cut on neck, fair complexion, attractive and officious. She was dressed in dark clothing. (RFK LAPD Microfilm, Volume 47, Progress Reports, pp. 250-251)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99733#relPageId=250
Quote off
So these are the basics according to Scheid. It seems like she was trying to get up to the second floor to where RFK was when she did not have a ticket for the event. What was her desire to go see RFK so bad that she would try to sneak in? We know that she did because there was another man named Albert LeBeau who was the bartender, and he was responsible for collecting the tickets. He was quoted in the same report as saying the following regarding the woman.
Quote on
...LeBeau said that the suspect (Sirhan) and an unidentified female companion had attempted to shove past LeBeau who was guarding the foot the stairs preventing persons from ascending the staircase that had no tickets. The suspect and the female had no tickets permitting them to attend the luncheon. After requesting tickets from the couple, LeBeau reluctantly permitted them to ascend the staircase to the dining room. (Ibid., p. 248)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99733#relPageId=248
Quote off
This shows without a doubt that the woman and "Sirhan" had no tickets for the event, but LeBeau let them enter anyway. Why? This was poor security, and it was inviting trouble. The man most likely was not Sirhan as Schneid described him as male, Caucasian, early twenties, 5-6 to 5-7, slender, dark curly hair, Latin or Mexican. (Ibid., p. 251)
The woman had told LeBeau that they "Were part of the Senator's party, he just waved us up." The man was pushing on her back the whole time she was talking with LeBeau, and he finally relented and let them head up to the second floor. LeBeau would see them upstairs about a half-hour later and they were leaning against the back wall, and this made him think that they could not have been part of RFK's party since they had no seats. LeBeau said that he bumped into the boy and said, "Pardon me," and the boy replied, "Why should I?" (Ibid.)
LeBeau would recognize Sirhan's picture in the newspapers following the assassination, but he told the FBI that Sirhan's photograph most closely resembled the man he saw, but he could not say for sure that it was Sirhan. (Ibid., p. 252)
LeBeau allowed them in despite having no tickets because the owner of "Robbie's Restaurant", Felicia Maas, told him to "admit all persons who cared to enter the banquet hall." (Ibid.) Maas had arranged for photographs to be taken of the event, and in one 8x10 photograph of the outside of the restaurant there is a male Latin type that could pass for Sirhan. (Ibid.)
Here is how LeBeau described the woman in question -- Caucasian, 25 to 30 years, 5-4 to 5-6, trim figure, with shoulder length straight light brown hair, wearing a satin blouse color unknown. He also said the man was of Latin type which is different from being Palestinian. (Ibid., p. 253) Even so, when LeBeau was shown 25 photographs of Latin type men, he picked out the mugshot of Sirhan from June 5, 1968. (Ibid.) He was asked point blank if he could swear to Sirhan being the man, and he said, "No." (Ibid., p. 254)
On May 24, 1968, Dr. Joseph Sheehan was with his wife Margeret at a Kennedy rally at the Los Angeles Sports Arena when they had a possible sighting of "Sirhan." After the rally ended at 10:30 p.m., the Sheehans waited for RFK to depart the arena with a large crowd of people in the parking lot for about a half-hour.
Here is the description of the event from Sheehan.
Quote on
Sheehan saw a man in front of him who appeared to be alone. Sheehan, a clinical psychologist, commented to his wife about the man. He described him as "completely out of character with the crowd" in that he "appeared very intense and sinister." The man did not participate in the carnival atmosphere that pervaded the crowd and disappeared from their view prior to Kennedy's appearance. Mrs. Sheehan positively identified Sirhan Sirhan as the man they observed outside the sports arena. (RFK LAPD Microfilm, Volume 76, p. 614, SUS Final Report)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99762#relPageId=245
Quote off
Mrs. Sheehan was sure it was Sirhan, but the report makes no mention of what Dr. Sheehan thought. He was a clinical psychologist so his thoughts about the man are relevant. He thought the man was "very intense and sinister" and not enjoying himself like the majority of the crowd in the parking lot.
Fortunately for us, there was an interview done with Dr. Sheehan on August 7, 1968, in which it states that he too identified the man he saw as Sirhan. The FBI interviewed him prior to this one and made it hard to find since they listed his surname as "Shedhan." Was this an accident or on purpose to bury his sighting? The interview provides some additional information on the man.
Quote on
He observed the suspect for a period of 3-5 min. Being a clinical psychologist he noted that the suspect had a very hostile look on his face. He appeared to be angry. He was kind of shabbily dressed, not fit for the occasion.
The doctor mentioned this to his wife, then told his wife, why should the Senator have to expose himself to people like that. His wife observed the same hostile look on the suspect that he did.
The suspect then walked away & the doctor didn't observe him any longer. He did not see him again that night.
The doctor was at the Ambassador Ballroom on 6-4/5-68 but did not see him there. Next time he saw him was when he saw this picture in the newspaper. He immediately recognized him. He showed the picture to his wife & she identified him also.
Dr. Sheehan was shown mugs of Sirhan & look alikes [sic]. These did not include the booking mug only latest picture of Sirhan. The Dr. immediately ID [sic] him & and stated that the person he saw did not have the pleasant look about him. (RFK LAPD Microfilm, Volume 66, p. 12)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99742#relPageId=12
Quote off
This interview provides much more information. Both Dr. Sheehan and his wife identified Sirhan as the man that they saw. If this is true, what was he doing there? Why did he look so angry while he was there? Was he under some form of control then?
There is one comment by Sheehan that I would like to address. He asked, "Why should the Senator have to expose himself to people like that?", and that is a snobbish comment in my opinion. RFK was open to all people, and he would have never thought this if he had seen him in his "shabby clothes."
Another sighting of "Sirhan" was on May 30, 1968, in Azusa, California, at the Kennedy Campaign Headquarters. Laverne Botting said that she was sitting at her desk in the afternoon when she noticed three individuals enter the building. Two of them stayed outside the counter, but the third, a man, walked around the counter and came up to her desk. Here are the details from a report.
Quote on
...[he] inquired whether or not KENNEDY was expected to visit the headquarters. She recalled this individual was told that KENNEDY was not scheduled to make any additional appearances in the San Gabriel Valley. She is not certain, but she believes the individual said that he was from Kennedy Headquarters in Pasadena, and that they were wondering if Senator KENNEDY was planning a visit to the area. BOTTING stated that she did not take the names and addresses of any of these individuals.
Mrs. BOTTING stated that the individual who approached her closely resembles SIRHAN BISHARA SIRHAN. A photograph of SIRHAN... was exhibited to BOTTING and she said from this photograph, she believes that the individual was SIRHAN, or a person who closely resembles SIRHAN. She added that there is a reasonable doubt in her mind that the individual was SIRHAN; however, she believes that she could definitely say one way or the other whether the individual was actually SIRHAN, if she had the opportunity to view SIRHAN in person. (RFK Assassination: L.A.F.O. #56-156: Sub File X-4, Volume 15, p. 930; p. 1 in original)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99667#relPageId=30
Quote off
Botting was pretty sure it was Sirhan but had some doubt and said that she would have to see him in person to know for sure. She told the FBI that the man had scars on his face from bad acne and that he spoke "excellent English." (Ibid., p. 2 in original) She also provided a description for the woman with this man (she did not observe the other man well) -- Female, White, 22-25, 5'7", slim (excellent figure), and (Dishwater) blond [sic] hair.
The woman in the polka-dot dress was said to have an "excellent figure" as well. She had dark hair, but this could have either been due to a dye job or she could have been wearing a wig. Botting described the man has having a broad nose and shoulders, but the LAPD said that she made a "mistake" about this despite picking Sirhan's mug shot as the man that she saw.
Ethel Crehan was sitting at the desk next to Botting and she saw the man who came up to her. She too noted the pock marks on the man's face and when Sirhan's photograph was displayed on the news on June 5, 1968, she recognized the man as the one who came to their headquarters on May 30.
She described the woman a little bit different and pointed out a few things that we have heard before. Crehan said that she was 5'8", thin, "nineteen but made-up to look 23 to 25 years old," with brown or blonde shoulder-length, bouffant styled hair and a
prominent nose."
You can read her full story here.
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99667#relPageId=32
The nose comment reminds me of Laurel Koons as I covered this in an article on the polka-dot dress mystery. You can read about that here.
jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1630/woman-polka-dot-dress-mystery
The woman seen at "Robbie's Restaurant" had her hair in a "bouffant" style as well. Was this the same woman? Both Botting and Crehan volunteered to take polygraph examinations, but the LAPD never took them up on this. Why?
The final sighting of "Sirhan" and the woman before June 4, 1968, occurred on June 1, 1968. Dean Pack was an insurance executive, and he was hiking in the Santa Ana Mountains with his teenage son when they came across two men and a woman shooting at cans. Pack said that one of the men shooting a pistol strongly resembled Sirhan, and when he saw Pack, he glared at him.
Pack said the other two were equally unfriendly and he described the other man as about 6'0", ruddy complexion and with sandy hair. The woman was early twenties with long brown hair.
Pack would tell author Jonn Christian later on that he was just glad to get out of there alive as he feared they might shoot him and his son in the back. He also said he offered to take the FBI up to the spot they were shooting so they could possibly collect shells, slugs and fingerprints, but the FBI was NOT interested and never took him up on this offer. Why? (Think conspiracy.)
The LAPD limited Pack's story to a very short summary which said, "Mr. Pack viewed a photograph of Sirhan [but] could not be positive of his identification." This is a total fabrication since the LAPD interviewed Pack by telephone and they did not display a photograph to him. This shows that these two people with Sirhan (or a double) had to be part of the conspiracy since both the FBI and LAPD were willing to totally ignore Pack's story. ("Early Saturday Morning", Turner & Christian, Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, 222; Dean Pack summary in LAPD, 1098.)
This all shows that like the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) there was a conspiracy at work here. I will cover further sightings that occurred on the day of the assassination in the next article.
cdn.aarp.net/content/dam/aarp/entertainment/television/2018/04/1140-bobby-kennedy-1968.web.jpg
media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/210827193559-02-robert-kennedy-assassination-file-restricted.jpg
i0.wp.com/robscholtemuseum.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/RFK-Girl-in-Polka-Dot-Dress-Sirhan-Sirhan-In-Ambassador-Hotel-the-Night-of-the-Shooting-foto-Gary-Revel.jpg
i.pinimg.com/originals/60/47/f1/6047f109a7064790e10a9ef9294bb862.jpg
The official story is that a lone shooter named Sirhan Sirhan shot and eventually killed Senator Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) on June 4, 1968, with an Iver Johnson Cadet .22-caliber revolver. The revolver held eight rounds and they said that Sirhan had fired all eight.
He did, but the problem was that there was evidence showing that more than eight rounds had been fired and this means a second gun was involved. This would be hidden for decades by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the government. RFK was also killed by a shot from behind his head and Sirhan was never behind him.
"Sirhan" was seen in the company of a woman (or women) in the weeks leading up to the assassination and I put his name in quotes because like Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) we cannot be sure if it was the Sirhan of fame or a man who looked like him. Either way, this issue would show that there was a conspiracy afoot and that is why these sightings never garnered much interest by the LAPD. They looked to downplay them instead.
The first sighting occurred on May 20, 1968, at "Robbie's Restaurant" in Pomona, California, where RFK had a luncheon planned. The luncheon was held on the second floor of the restaurant and that is how the sighting occurred. Officer William Schneid was stationed at the foot of the stairway to hold back the crowd so that they couldn't go upstairs where RFK was.
He would see a woman and man who resembled Sirhan before RFK went upstairs and this was recounted in a LAPD report. Here is the relevant information.
Quote on
...Prior to Senator Kennedy and his part ascending the staircase to the second floor, he recalls seeing a girl in her mid-twenties, standing by the kitchen door on the west side of the corridor. It was Schneid's recollection that this girl was apparently trying to enter the kitchen. Schneid told her she could not enter the kitchen. Schneid recalled the girl asking him which way Senator Kennedy was coming in, and he told her, probably up the staircase to the second floor.
Schneid related that when the Kennedy party did ascend the staircase that Senator Kennedy paused midway, pointed at Schneid and said, "officer, let them through." Schneid said that Kennedy referred to the people in the aisle that Schneid was holding back. When Senator Kennedy said this, the crowd surged toward the foot of the stairs and he stepped back.
Schneid recalled that the aforementioned girl bolted toward the area at the foot of the stairs and moved into a booth area on the north side of the staircase instead of trying to ascend the stairs. It was Schneid's impression that she was trying to reach someone she might have recognized.
Possibly a moment later Schneid saw the same girl on the staircase. It was his impression that someone might have assisted her over the brick facade adjacent to the staircase and over the stair railing behind the persons who were checking for admission tickets... Schneid said he never saw the girl again.
He described the girl in question as female, Caucasian, mid-twenties, 5-4 to 5-7, 110 to 125 pounds, medium to light brown hair, bouffant style on top, close-cut on neck, fair complexion, attractive and officious. She was dressed in dark clothing. (RFK LAPD Microfilm, Volume 47, Progress Reports, pp. 250-251)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99733#relPageId=250
Quote off
So these are the basics according to Scheid. It seems like she was trying to get up to the second floor to where RFK was when she did not have a ticket for the event. What was her desire to go see RFK so bad that she would try to sneak in? We know that she did because there was another man named Albert LeBeau who was the bartender, and he was responsible for collecting the tickets. He was quoted in the same report as saying the following regarding the woman.
Quote on
...LeBeau said that the suspect (Sirhan) and an unidentified female companion had attempted to shove past LeBeau who was guarding the foot the stairs preventing persons from ascending the staircase that had no tickets. The suspect and the female had no tickets permitting them to attend the luncheon. After requesting tickets from the couple, LeBeau reluctantly permitted them to ascend the staircase to the dining room. (Ibid., p. 248)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99733#relPageId=248
Quote off
This shows without a doubt that the woman and "Sirhan" had no tickets for the event, but LeBeau let them enter anyway. Why? This was poor security, and it was inviting trouble. The man most likely was not Sirhan as Schneid described him as male, Caucasian, early twenties, 5-6 to 5-7, slender, dark curly hair, Latin or Mexican. (Ibid., p. 251)
The woman had told LeBeau that they "Were part of the Senator's party, he just waved us up." The man was pushing on her back the whole time she was talking with LeBeau, and he finally relented and let them head up to the second floor. LeBeau would see them upstairs about a half-hour later and they were leaning against the back wall, and this made him think that they could not have been part of RFK's party since they had no seats. LeBeau said that he bumped into the boy and said, "Pardon me," and the boy replied, "Why should I?" (Ibid.)
LeBeau would recognize Sirhan's picture in the newspapers following the assassination, but he told the FBI that Sirhan's photograph most closely resembled the man he saw, but he could not say for sure that it was Sirhan. (Ibid., p. 252)
LeBeau allowed them in despite having no tickets because the owner of "Robbie's Restaurant", Felicia Maas, told him to "admit all persons who cared to enter the banquet hall." (Ibid.) Maas had arranged for photographs to be taken of the event, and in one 8x10 photograph of the outside of the restaurant there is a male Latin type that could pass for Sirhan. (Ibid.)
Here is how LeBeau described the woman in question -- Caucasian, 25 to 30 years, 5-4 to 5-6, trim figure, with shoulder length straight light brown hair, wearing a satin blouse color unknown. He also said the man was of Latin type which is different from being Palestinian. (Ibid., p. 253) Even so, when LeBeau was shown 25 photographs of Latin type men, he picked out the mugshot of Sirhan from June 5, 1968. (Ibid.) He was asked point blank if he could swear to Sirhan being the man, and he said, "No." (Ibid., p. 254)
On May 24, 1968, Dr. Joseph Sheehan was with his wife Margeret at a Kennedy rally at the Los Angeles Sports Arena when they had a possible sighting of "Sirhan." After the rally ended at 10:30 p.m., the Sheehans waited for RFK to depart the arena with a large crowd of people in the parking lot for about a half-hour.
Here is the description of the event from Sheehan.
Quote on
Sheehan saw a man in front of him who appeared to be alone. Sheehan, a clinical psychologist, commented to his wife about the man. He described him as "completely out of character with the crowd" in that he "appeared very intense and sinister." The man did not participate in the carnival atmosphere that pervaded the crowd and disappeared from their view prior to Kennedy's appearance. Mrs. Sheehan positively identified Sirhan Sirhan as the man they observed outside the sports arena. (RFK LAPD Microfilm, Volume 76, p. 614, SUS Final Report)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99762#relPageId=245
Quote off
Mrs. Sheehan was sure it was Sirhan, but the report makes no mention of what Dr. Sheehan thought. He was a clinical psychologist so his thoughts about the man are relevant. He thought the man was "very intense and sinister" and not enjoying himself like the majority of the crowd in the parking lot.
Fortunately for us, there was an interview done with Dr. Sheehan on August 7, 1968, in which it states that he too identified the man he saw as Sirhan. The FBI interviewed him prior to this one and made it hard to find since they listed his surname as "Shedhan." Was this an accident or on purpose to bury his sighting? The interview provides some additional information on the man.
Quote on
He observed the suspect for a period of 3-5 min. Being a clinical psychologist he noted that the suspect had a very hostile look on his face. He appeared to be angry. He was kind of shabbily dressed, not fit for the occasion.
The doctor mentioned this to his wife, then told his wife, why should the Senator have to expose himself to people like that. His wife observed the same hostile look on the suspect that he did.
The suspect then walked away & the doctor didn't observe him any longer. He did not see him again that night.
The doctor was at the Ambassador Ballroom on 6-4/5-68 but did not see him there. Next time he saw him was when he saw this picture in the newspaper. He immediately recognized him. He showed the picture to his wife & she identified him also.
Dr. Sheehan was shown mugs of Sirhan & look alikes [sic]. These did not include the booking mug only latest picture of Sirhan. The Dr. immediately ID [sic] him & and stated that the person he saw did not have the pleasant look about him. (RFK LAPD Microfilm, Volume 66, p. 12)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99742#relPageId=12
Quote off
This interview provides much more information. Both Dr. Sheehan and his wife identified Sirhan as the man that they saw. If this is true, what was he doing there? Why did he look so angry while he was there? Was he under some form of control then?
There is one comment by Sheehan that I would like to address. He asked, "Why should the Senator have to expose himself to people like that?", and that is a snobbish comment in my opinion. RFK was open to all people, and he would have never thought this if he had seen him in his "shabby clothes."
Another sighting of "Sirhan" was on May 30, 1968, in Azusa, California, at the Kennedy Campaign Headquarters. Laverne Botting said that she was sitting at her desk in the afternoon when she noticed three individuals enter the building. Two of them stayed outside the counter, but the third, a man, walked around the counter and came up to her desk. Here are the details from a report.
Quote on
...[he] inquired whether or not KENNEDY was expected to visit the headquarters. She recalled this individual was told that KENNEDY was not scheduled to make any additional appearances in the San Gabriel Valley. She is not certain, but she believes the individual said that he was from Kennedy Headquarters in Pasadena, and that they were wondering if Senator KENNEDY was planning a visit to the area. BOTTING stated that she did not take the names and addresses of any of these individuals.
Mrs. BOTTING stated that the individual who approached her closely resembles SIRHAN BISHARA SIRHAN. A photograph of SIRHAN... was exhibited to BOTTING and she said from this photograph, she believes that the individual was SIRHAN, or a person who closely resembles SIRHAN. She added that there is a reasonable doubt in her mind that the individual was SIRHAN; however, she believes that she could definitely say one way or the other whether the individual was actually SIRHAN, if she had the opportunity to view SIRHAN in person. (RFK Assassination: L.A.F.O. #56-156: Sub File X-4, Volume 15, p. 930; p. 1 in original)
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99667#relPageId=30
Quote off
Botting was pretty sure it was Sirhan but had some doubt and said that she would have to see him in person to know for sure. She told the FBI that the man had scars on his face from bad acne and that he spoke "excellent English." (Ibid., p. 2 in original) She also provided a description for the woman with this man (she did not observe the other man well) -- Female, White, 22-25, 5'7", slim (excellent figure), and (Dishwater) blond [sic] hair.
The woman in the polka-dot dress was said to have an "excellent figure" as well. She had dark hair, but this could have either been due to a dye job or she could have been wearing a wig. Botting described the man has having a broad nose and shoulders, but the LAPD said that she made a "mistake" about this despite picking Sirhan's mug shot as the man that she saw.
Ethel Crehan was sitting at the desk next to Botting and she saw the man who came up to her. She too noted the pock marks on the man's face and when Sirhan's photograph was displayed on the news on June 5, 1968, she recognized the man as the one who came to their headquarters on May 30.
She described the woman a little bit different and pointed out a few things that we have heard before. Crehan said that she was 5'8", thin, "nineteen but made-up to look 23 to 25 years old," with brown or blonde shoulder-length, bouffant styled hair and a
prominent nose."
You can read her full story here.
www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=99667#relPageId=32
The nose comment reminds me of Laurel Koons as I covered this in an article on the polka-dot dress mystery. You can read about that here.
jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1630/woman-polka-dot-dress-mystery
The woman seen at "Robbie's Restaurant" had her hair in a "bouffant" style as well. Was this the same woman? Both Botting and Crehan volunteered to take polygraph examinations, but the LAPD never took them up on this. Why?
The final sighting of "Sirhan" and the woman before June 4, 1968, occurred on June 1, 1968. Dean Pack was an insurance executive, and he was hiking in the Santa Ana Mountains with his teenage son when they came across two men and a woman shooting at cans. Pack said that one of the men shooting a pistol strongly resembled Sirhan, and when he saw Pack, he glared at him.
Pack said the other two were equally unfriendly and he described the other man as about 6'0", ruddy complexion and with sandy hair. The woman was early twenties with long brown hair.
Pack would tell author Jonn Christian later on that he was just glad to get out of there alive as he feared they might shoot him and his son in the back. He also said he offered to take the FBI up to the spot they were shooting so they could possibly collect shells, slugs and fingerprints, but the FBI was NOT interested and never took him up on this offer. Why? (Think conspiracy.)
The LAPD limited Pack's story to a very short summary which said, "Mr. Pack viewed a photograph of Sirhan [but] could not be positive of his identification." This is a total fabrication since the LAPD interviewed Pack by telephone and they did not display a photograph to him. This shows that these two people with Sirhan (or a double) had to be part of the conspiracy since both the FBI and LAPD were willing to totally ignore Pack's story. ("Early Saturday Morning", Turner & Christian, Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, 222; Dean Pack summary in LAPD, 1098.)
This all shows that like the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) there was a conspiracy at work here. I will cover further sightings that occurred on the day of the assassination in the next article.