Post by Rob Caprio on Mar 18, 2019 21:43:28 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
img684.imageshack.us/img684/8941/jfk74f1.jpg
Yes, this sounds absurd, but it’s true. IF we go to Volume II, page 364, you will see this testimony.
Mr. SPECTER - Have you had an opportunity to examine the clothing which has been identified for you as being that worn by the President on the day of the assassination?
Commander HUMES - Yes; yesterday, just shortly before the Commission hearing today was begun, Mr. Chief Justice, we had opportunity for the first time to examine the clothing worn by the late President.
In private conversation among ourselves before this opportunity, we predicted we would find defects in the clothing corresponding with the defects which were found, of course, on the body of the late President.
Isn’t the clothing one of the most important parts of the process to show you were the shots entered so you can match it up with the body? Why was this denied to the prosectors? Also, could it have something to do with this comment?
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0011b.gif
…During the course of the spectrographic examinations previously conducted on the fabric surrounding the hole in the front of the shirt, including the tie, NO COPPER WAS FOUND in excess of that present elsewhere in undamaged areas of the shirt and tie. Therefore, NO COPPER WAS FOUND WHICH COULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO PROJECTILE FRAGMENTS. (Gallagher Exhibit No.1, p. 2)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/html/WH_Vol20_0011b.htm
Quote off
I’m sure it did. They didn’t want any poking around clothing to see what John Gallagher saw I’m sure, but let’s leave it open for the WC defenders. Can you tell me why the prosectors did NOT have access to the clothing during their autopsy?
img684.imageshack.us/img684/8941/jfk74f1.jpg
Yes, this sounds absurd, but it’s true. IF we go to Volume II, page 364, you will see this testimony.
Mr. SPECTER - Have you had an opportunity to examine the clothing which has been identified for you as being that worn by the President on the day of the assassination?
Commander HUMES - Yes; yesterday, just shortly before the Commission hearing today was begun, Mr. Chief Justice, we had opportunity for the first time to examine the clothing worn by the late President.
In private conversation among ourselves before this opportunity, we predicted we would find defects in the clothing corresponding with the defects which were found, of course, on the body of the late President.
Isn’t the clothing one of the most important parts of the process to show you were the shots entered so you can match it up with the body? Why was this denied to the prosectors? Also, could it have something to do with this comment?
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0011b.gif
…During the course of the spectrographic examinations previously conducted on the fabric surrounding the hole in the front of the shirt, including the tie, NO COPPER WAS FOUND in excess of that present elsewhere in undamaged areas of the shirt and tie. Therefore, NO COPPER WAS FOUND WHICH COULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO PROJECTILE FRAGMENTS. (Gallagher Exhibit No.1, p. 2)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/html/WH_Vol20_0011b.htm
Quote off
I’m sure it did. They didn’t want any poking around clothing to see what John Gallagher saw I’m sure, but let’s leave it open for the WC defenders. Can you tell me why the prosectors did NOT have access to the clothing during their autopsy?