Post by Rob Caprio on Mar 26, 2019 21:40:05 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Rob Caprio 2006-2024
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pages/WH_Vol16_0269a.jpg
IF Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) shot J.D. Tippit (JDT) with a revolver as claimed by the Dallas Police Department (DPD), FBI and the Warren Commission (WC), why did the DPD broadcast something TOTALLY DIFFERENT on the day of the shooting?
If we go to Commission Exhibit (CE) 1974, a FBI report on DPD transmission, dated 8/11/64, and turn to page 870 (page 78 of report) we will see the following comment.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0451b.gif
550/2 (Sergeant G. Hill) The shell at the scene indicates that the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 RATHER THAN A PISTOL.
Dispatcher (Hulse (?) and MC Daniel) 10-4. (CE 1974, p. 78)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0451b.htm
Quote off
For the WC defenders/rewriters of history, who say that Hill made a “mistake” this shows he did NOT make a mistake. He clearly says based on the SHELL AT THE SCENE (that he obviously examined) the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 RATHER THAN A PISTOL. He didn’t have to say “rather than a pistol" IF he was unsure as the WC defenders claim now. Automatic and revolver shells look very differently so a man with many years of experience would NOT make a mistake like this anyway, but if he couldn’t tell the difference by sight he had a backup—they were marked with words like “AUTO” and “.38 Special” to help him out.
The FACT he said “rather than a pistol" shows us his later on comments about confusing the shells were a bunch of baloney. He even tried to blame this “mistake” on the way the shells were laying. What this has to do with anything is beyond me as he was given two shells already FOUND by Domingo Benavides and handed to him by Officer Poe.
Mr. HILL. …And he said they had just told him on channel 2 that he was dead. I got back in 105's car, went back around to the original scene, gave him his car keys back, and left his ear there, and at this point he came up to me with a Winston cigarette package.
Mr. BELIN. Who was this?
Mr. HILL. This was Poe.
Mr. BELIN. You went back to 400 East 10th Street?
Mr. HILL. Right. And Poe showed me a Winston cigarette package that contained three spent jackets from shells that he said a citizen had pointed out to him where the suspect had reloaded his gun and dropped these in the grass, and that the citizen had picked them up and put them in the Winston package.
I told Poe to maintain the chain of evidence as small as possible, for him to retain these at that time, and to be sure and mark them for evidence, and then turn them over to the crime lab when he got there, or to homicide.
Based on this testimony, given in 1964, he is acting like he NEVER looked at the shells in the Winston package, but his TRANSMISSION belies this claim as he would NOT have used the words he used IF he had NOT looked at the shells. Also, note how he got the NUMBER OF SHELLS in the package wrong! He testified to there being THREE spent jackets in the package when there was ONLY two per the WC! Why did Belin NOT correct him or ask about this?
Who was the person who gave him the description that was broadcasted anyway?
(The first man that came up to me, he said, "The man that shot him was a white male about 5'10", weighing 160 to 170 pounds, had on a Jacket and a pair of dark trousers, and brown bushy hair.")
Mr. BELIN. Now, let me interrupt you here, sergeant. Do you remember the name of the person that gave you the description?
Mr. HILL. No. I turned him over to Poe, and I didn't even get his name.
Again, as in the alleged Howard Brennan situation of providing the description of the John F. Kennedy (JFK) shooter that was broadcasted at 12:45 p.m., we see that Hill did NOT BOTHER TO GET THE NAME OF THE MAN THAT GAVE HIM THE DESCRIPTION FOR THE JDT SHOOTER!
Did all police procedures GO OUT THE WINDOW on 11/22/63 or what? Notice too that he said the “first MAN” came up to him as we have seen the comment about “bushy hair” solely placed with Helen Markham over the years, but here he says a man, whose name he did NOT bother to get, said the shooter had bushy hair too! LHO did NOT have bushy hair so that alone would exonerate him in the shooting.
It is clear from the evidence in the WC’s own volumes that LHO did NOT shoot JDT, so why did they claim he did?
history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pages/WH_Vol16_0269a.jpg
IF Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) shot J.D. Tippit (JDT) with a revolver as claimed by the Dallas Police Department (DPD), FBI and the Warren Commission (WC), why did the DPD broadcast something TOTALLY DIFFERENT on the day of the shooting?
If we go to Commission Exhibit (CE) 1974, a FBI report on DPD transmission, dated 8/11/64, and turn to page 870 (page 78 of report) we will see the following comment.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/pages/WH_Vol23_0451b.gif
550/2 (Sergeant G. Hill) The shell at the scene indicates that the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 RATHER THAN A PISTOL.
Dispatcher (Hulse (?) and MC Daniel) 10-4. (CE 1974, p. 78)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh23/html/WH_Vol23_0451b.htm
Quote off
For the WC defenders/rewriters of history, who say that Hill made a “mistake” this shows he did NOT make a mistake. He clearly says based on the SHELL AT THE SCENE (that he obviously examined) the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 RATHER THAN A PISTOL. He didn’t have to say “rather than a pistol" IF he was unsure as the WC defenders claim now. Automatic and revolver shells look very differently so a man with many years of experience would NOT make a mistake like this anyway, but if he couldn’t tell the difference by sight he had a backup—they were marked with words like “AUTO” and “.38 Special” to help him out.
The FACT he said “rather than a pistol" shows us his later on comments about confusing the shells were a bunch of baloney. He even tried to blame this “mistake” on the way the shells were laying. What this has to do with anything is beyond me as he was given two shells already FOUND by Domingo Benavides and handed to him by Officer Poe.
Mr. HILL. …And he said they had just told him on channel 2 that he was dead. I got back in 105's car, went back around to the original scene, gave him his car keys back, and left his ear there, and at this point he came up to me with a Winston cigarette package.
Mr. BELIN. Who was this?
Mr. HILL. This was Poe.
Mr. BELIN. You went back to 400 East 10th Street?
Mr. HILL. Right. And Poe showed me a Winston cigarette package that contained three spent jackets from shells that he said a citizen had pointed out to him where the suspect had reloaded his gun and dropped these in the grass, and that the citizen had picked them up and put them in the Winston package.
I told Poe to maintain the chain of evidence as small as possible, for him to retain these at that time, and to be sure and mark them for evidence, and then turn them over to the crime lab when he got there, or to homicide.
Based on this testimony, given in 1964, he is acting like he NEVER looked at the shells in the Winston package, but his TRANSMISSION belies this claim as he would NOT have used the words he used IF he had NOT looked at the shells. Also, note how he got the NUMBER OF SHELLS in the package wrong! He testified to there being THREE spent jackets in the package when there was ONLY two per the WC! Why did Belin NOT correct him or ask about this?
Who was the person who gave him the description that was broadcasted anyway?
(The first man that came up to me, he said, "The man that shot him was a white male about 5'10", weighing 160 to 170 pounds, had on a Jacket and a pair of dark trousers, and brown bushy hair.")
Mr. BELIN. Now, let me interrupt you here, sergeant. Do you remember the name of the person that gave you the description?
Mr. HILL. No. I turned him over to Poe, and I didn't even get his name.
Again, as in the alleged Howard Brennan situation of providing the description of the John F. Kennedy (JFK) shooter that was broadcasted at 12:45 p.m., we see that Hill did NOT BOTHER TO GET THE NAME OF THE MAN THAT GAVE HIM THE DESCRIPTION FOR THE JDT SHOOTER!
Did all police procedures GO OUT THE WINDOW on 11/22/63 or what? Notice too that he said the “first MAN” came up to him as we have seen the comment about “bushy hair” solely placed with Helen Markham over the years, but here he says a man, whose name he did NOT bother to get, said the shooter had bushy hair too! LHO did NOT have bushy hair so that alone would exonerate him in the shooting.
It is clear from the evidence in the WC’s own volumes that LHO did NOT shoot JDT, so why did they claim he did?