Post by Rob Caprio on Apr 7, 2019 21:08:58 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/16/article-2462106-18C360B200000578-808_636x382.jpg
Why would you clean and press EVIDENCE?
Believe it or not this is what happened to Governor John Connally’s (JBC) shirt, jacket and trousers!
Mr. SPECTER - Were you able to determine from your examination of the Governor's clothing whether or not they had been cleaned and pressed prior to the time you saw them?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes; they had.
Mr. SPECTER - Is that different from or the same as the condition of the President's clothing which you have just described this morning?
Mr. FRAZIER - It is different in that the President's clothing had not been cleaned. It had only been dried. The blood was dried. However, the Governor's garments had been cleaned and pressed.
Mr. SPECTER - Had the President's clothing been pressed then?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
This means this comment is NOTHING but speculation since he could NOT find copper to prove it.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics observable to formulate a conclusion as to the cause and direction of that hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; there were no characteristics on which you could base a conclusion as to what caused it, whether or not it was a bullet and if it had been, what the direction of the projectile was.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5-mm. bullet coming from the rear of the wearer toward his front?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
We again are left with BIASED SPECULATION due to the cleaning and pressing.
Mr. SPECTER - Referring now to the front side of the Governor's shirt, what, if anything, did you observe with respect to a tear or a hole thereon, as to the body of the shirt?
Mr. FRAZIER - I found in the right chest area of the shirt, considering the shirt when it is being worn, a very irregular tear more or less in the form of an "H," of the letter "H." This tear was approximately 1 1/2 inches in height, with the crossbar tear being approximately 1 inch in width, which caused a very irregularly shaped and enlarged hole in the front of the shirt. The hole is located 5 inches from the right-side seam, and 9 inches below the top of the right sleeve. The 9-inch figure is from the top of the right shoulder where the sleeve adjoins the yoke of the shirt.
Mr. SPECTER - Had that garment been cleaned and pressed, Mr. Frazier, prior to the time you examined it?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics then remaining on the hole on the front side to enable you to formulate an opinion as to the cause of the hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5 millimeter bullet exiting from the chest of the Governor?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, it could.
It could have been from a Civil War musket ball too (a shout out to Ben Holmes and his nonsense) for all we know as he clearly states it is IMPOSSIBLE to know since the shirt had been CLEANED AND PRESSED BEFORE he examined it. Can any WC defender explain why this was done? Is this normal evidence handling in a murder case?
Back of shirt (CE-685):
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0184b.jpg
Front of shirt (CE-686):
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0185a.jpg
i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/16/article-2462106-18C360B200000578-808_636x382.jpg
Why would you clean and press EVIDENCE?
Believe it or not this is what happened to Governor John Connally’s (JBC) shirt, jacket and trousers!
Mr. SPECTER - Were you able to determine from your examination of the Governor's clothing whether or not they had been cleaned and pressed prior to the time you saw them?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes; they had.
Mr. SPECTER - Is that different from or the same as the condition of the President's clothing which you have just described this morning?
Mr. FRAZIER - It is different in that the President's clothing had not been cleaned. It had only been dried. The blood was dried. However, the Governor's garments had been cleaned and pressed.
Mr. SPECTER - Had the President's clothing been pressed then?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
This means this comment is NOTHING but speculation since he could NOT find copper to prove it.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics observable to formulate a conclusion as to the cause and direction of that hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; there were no characteristics on which you could base a conclusion as to what caused it, whether or not it was a bullet and if it had been, what the direction of the projectile was.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5-mm. bullet coming from the rear of the wearer toward his front?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
We again are left with BIASED SPECULATION due to the cleaning and pressing.
Mr. SPECTER - Referring now to the front side of the Governor's shirt, what, if anything, did you observe with respect to a tear or a hole thereon, as to the body of the shirt?
Mr. FRAZIER - I found in the right chest area of the shirt, considering the shirt when it is being worn, a very irregular tear more or less in the form of an "H," of the letter "H." This tear was approximately 1 1/2 inches in height, with the crossbar tear being approximately 1 inch in width, which caused a very irregularly shaped and enlarged hole in the front of the shirt. The hole is located 5 inches from the right-side seam, and 9 inches below the top of the right sleeve. The 9-inch figure is from the top of the right shoulder where the sleeve adjoins the yoke of the shirt.
Mr. SPECTER - Had that garment been cleaned and pressed, Mr. Frazier, prior to the time you examined it?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Were there sufficient characteristics then remaining on the hole on the front side to enable you to formulate an opinion as to the cause of the hole?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir.
Mr. SPECTER - Could it have been caused by a 6.5 millimeter bullet exiting from the chest of the Governor?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, it could.
It could have been from a Civil War musket ball too (a shout out to Ben Holmes and his nonsense) for all we know as he clearly states it is IMPOSSIBLE to know since the shirt had been CLEANED AND PRESSED BEFORE he examined it. Can any WC defender explain why this was done? Is this normal evidence handling in a murder case?
Back of shirt (CE-685):
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0184b.jpg
Front of shirt (CE-686):
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0185a.jpg