Post by Rob Caprio on May 21, 2019 20:20:35 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2025
www.famouspictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CE-133-all.jpg
Malcolm Thompson was an unbiased photographic expert in England who was asked to view the Backyard Photographs (BYPs). Mr. Thompson had a lot of expertise as he ran (his title was Detective Superintendent) the Police Forensic Science Laboratory Identification Bureau at Scotland Yard for twenty-five years. He also was the former president of the Evidence Photographers International Council; a fellow of the Institute of Incorporated Photographers; the Royal Photographic Society, and the Institute of Professional Investigators.
The very experienced Mr. Thompson said this after analysts the BYPs.
Quotes on
...the retouching is very obvious in certain parts of the picture... Without doubt that shows this area between the head and the pillar has been retouched and the retoucher has just not been careful enough. (High Treason, p. 172)
Quote off
Mr. Thompson would go on to say when asked if he thought the shadows had been touched in "They have been touched in." (Ibid.)
The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) had trouble at first in finding "photographic experts" for their panel as they initially said anyone that had worked with U.S. intelligence groups were precluded from joining them, that is until they found out the vast majority of the leading photographic scientists in the U.S. had done work with the various intelligence groups. Thus, they had to let them in, so how reliable is their work in terms of the truth?
Mr. Thompson was asked to look at these photographs and he said in both CE 133 A and 133 C the shadow lines up in a ten o'clock fashion, but the shadows are totally different in terms of length. Here is what Jack White who was part of the HSCA photographic panel said about the photographs.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol2/pages/HSCA_Vol2_0170a.gif
In 133-C, the shadow is again pointing to ten o'clock, but even though the figure is shorter, is casting a longer shadow; in fact, the shadow goes six or seven inches up the fence." (HSCA II, p. 335)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol2/html/HSCA_Vol2_0170a.htm
Quote off
Mr. Thompson was one of a number of photographing experts who had no horse in the race that concluded that the BYPs were retouched, thus, there were not genuine as the Warren Commission (WC) and HSCA claimed. This means that they were created to frame Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) as the assassin of President John F. Kennedy (JFK)..
www.famouspictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CE-133-all.jpg
Malcolm Thompson was an unbiased photographic expert in England who was asked to view the Backyard Photographs (BYPs). Mr. Thompson had a lot of expertise as he ran (his title was Detective Superintendent) the Police Forensic Science Laboratory Identification Bureau at Scotland Yard for twenty-five years. He also was the former president of the Evidence Photographers International Council; a fellow of the Institute of Incorporated Photographers; the Royal Photographic Society, and the Institute of Professional Investigators.
The very experienced Mr. Thompson said this after analysts the BYPs.
Quotes on
...the retouching is very obvious in certain parts of the picture... Without doubt that shows this area between the head and the pillar has been retouched and the retoucher has just not been careful enough. (High Treason, p. 172)
Quote off
Mr. Thompson would go on to say when asked if he thought the shadows had been touched in "They have been touched in." (Ibid.)
The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) had trouble at first in finding "photographic experts" for their panel as they initially said anyone that had worked with U.S. intelligence groups were precluded from joining them, that is until they found out the vast majority of the leading photographic scientists in the U.S. had done work with the various intelligence groups. Thus, they had to let them in, so how reliable is their work in terms of the truth?
Mr. Thompson was asked to look at these photographs and he said in both CE 133 A and 133 C the shadow lines up in a ten o'clock fashion, but the shadows are totally different in terms of length. Here is what Jack White who was part of the HSCA photographic panel said about the photographs.
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol2/pages/HSCA_Vol2_0170a.gif
In 133-C, the shadow is again pointing to ten o'clock, but even though the figure is shorter, is casting a longer shadow; in fact, the shadow goes six or seven inches up the fence." (HSCA II, p. 335)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol2/html/HSCA_Vol2_0170a.htm
Quote off
Mr. Thompson was one of a number of photographing experts who had no horse in the race that concluded that the BYPs were retouched, thus, there were not genuine as the Warren Commission (WC) and HSCA claimed. This means that they were created to frame Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) as the assassin of President John F. Kennedy (JFK)..