Post by Rob Caprio on May 26, 2019 9:20:47 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
DPD Recreation Photograph:
merdist.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/FBI-1964-reenactment.jpg
Why does the Dallas Police Department (DPD) recreation photograph in the twenty-six volumes match a negative for a photograph NOT in evidence?
According to the Warren Commission (WC) there are ONLY two backyard photographs (BYPs) and they are designated CE 133-A & CE 133-B and combined for CE 714.
CE 714: www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0262b.jpg
The WC was also very kind in publishing this DPD recreation photograph for us too.
CE 712: www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0262a.jpg
Does CE 712 look like CE 133 A or B? NOT to me. It would match this cutout that was found in the DPD files over twenty years later though.
Cutout photograph: www.pimall.com/nais/news/images/Ghost.gif
John McAdams wrote this awhile ago about the La Fontaines comment on this subject.
Quote on
Where on many issues, the La Fontaines at least offer a novel or innovative theory, on the issue of CE 133-C they show all the worst characteristics of conspiracy writers.
CE 133-C was the "third" or "missing" backyard photo, which the Warren Commission never saw, and which turned up in the possession of Roscoe White's widow in the 1970s. The HSCA analyzed it in excruciating detail. See HSCA Volume 6.
The La Fontaines huff and puff about this, asking "What was it about the picture that made *it* the one chosen for 'reenactment' and not the other two supposedly available photos, 133-A and 133-B? Why did 133-C then disappear between late 1963 and 1975?"
The simple fact is that this huffing and puffing substitutes for the lack of *any* hypothesis about how the loss of CE 133-C might be sinister.
It is true that the LaFontaines *quote* a theory of why the photo might have been withheld. It revolves around a "ghost photo" of the Oswald backyard with a cutout in the shape of Oswald in the 133-C pose. The photo was found in the files of the Dallas Police.
[Note: Since the death of John McAdams, many of his links no longer work. I cannot find this article on his website. It is authentic or I would not have included it back in 2011 when I wrote this. RC]
Quote off
The simple point McAdams avoids in his attack on the La Fontaines is, how did the DPD know to pose like that when NEITHER CE 133A or 133B show that pose? Why wouldn’t they pose like the two OFFICIAL poses show Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) allegedly in? Isn't that the whole point of RECREATING something? Here is a good example of how the DPD copied 133C for their recreation poses.
www.ahealedplanet.net/133-c.jpg
DPD Recreation Photograph:
merdist.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/FBI-1964-reenactment.jpg
Why does the Dallas Police Department (DPD) recreation photograph in the twenty-six volumes match a negative for a photograph NOT in evidence?
According to the Warren Commission (WC) there are ONLY two backyard photographs (BYPs) and they are designated CE 133-A & CE 133-B and combined for CE 714.
CE 714: www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0262b.jpg
The WC was also very kind in publishing this DPD recreation photograph for us too.
CE 712: www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0262a.jpg
Does CE 712 look like CE 133 A or B? NOT to me. It would match this cutout that was found in the DPD files over twenty years later though.
Cutout photograph: www.pimall.com/nais/news/images/Ghost.gif
John McAdams wrote this awhile ago about the La Fontaines comment on this subject.
Quote on
Where on many issues, the La Fontaines at least offer a novel or innovative theory, on the issue of CE 133-C they show all the worst characteristics of conspiracy writers.
CE 133-C was the "third" or "missing" backyard photo, which the Warren Commission never saw, and which turned up in the possession of Roscoe White's widow in the 1970s. The HSCA analyzed it in excruciating detail. See HSCA Volume 6.
The La Fontaines huff and puff about this, asking "What was it about the picture that made *it* the one chosen for 'reenactment' and not the other two supposedly available photos, 133-A and 133-B? Why did 133-C then disappear between late 1963 and 1975?"
The simple fact is that this huffing and puffing substitutes for the lack of *any* hypothesis about how the loss of CE 133-C might be sinister.
It is true that the LaFontaines *quote* a theory of why the photo might have been withheld. It revolves around a "ghost photo" of the Oswald backyard with a cutout in the shape of Oswald in the 133-C pose. The photo was found in the files of the Dallas Police.
[Note: Since the death of John McAdams, many of his links no longer work. I cannot find this article on his website. It is authentic or I would not have included it back in 2011 when I wrote this. RC]
Quote off
The simple point McAdams avoids in his attack on the La Fontaines is, how did the DPD know to pose like that when NEITHER CE 133A or 133B show that pose? Why wouldn’t they pose like the two OFFICIAL poses show Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) allegedly in? Isn't that the whole point of RECREATING something? Here is a good example of how the DPD copied 133C for their recreation poses.
www.ahealedplanet.net/133-c.jpg