Post by Rob Caprio on Oct 24, 2018 17:38:26 GMT -5
All portions are ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
3.bp.blogspot.com/_I4lZU0BrRsg/TPXTI3y8v1I/AAAAAAAAAE4/Hot_KJ7VKdY/s1600/warren.jpg
I have done 15 questions in an earlier post in this series and I will now do 10 more. NO answer can be given that does NOT point to a conspiracy.
*********************************
1) Why are John Connally’s (JBC) X-rays in the twenty-six volumes, but John F. Kennedy’s (JFK) are NOT?
If one goes to CE 691-696,
www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0187b.jpg
…you will see them, but you will NOT find any X-rays for JFK in the twenty-six volumes. Why NOT? Wasn’t our president worthy of X-rays? Of course, he was, but they were NOT included in the evidence. Why NOT?
2) Why did O.V. Campbell say Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was missing from the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) when he admitted to NEVER SEEING HIM to know what he looked like?
It is true. Go to CE 1435 and read the following:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pages/WH_Vol22_0438a.gif
…Inside he was told shortly thereafter by the warehouse superintendent, Mr. Truly, that all the employees of the company had been rounded up and one employee, Lee Harvey Oswald was missing.
Mr. Campbell observed a photograph Lee Harvey Oswald, bearing New Orleans, Louisiana No. 112 723, and stated that he is sure this is a photograph of the employee named above, but added that he not personally acquainted with him and HAS NEVER SEEN HIM. He advised that he has always given Mr. Truly the responsibility of hiring employees for the warehouse. (CE 1435, p. 845) (emphasis mine)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0438a.htm
Quote off
First of all, the claim that “employees were rounded up” is simply NOT true as I have shown in an earlier post in this series. NO roll call ever took place. Secondly, LHO was hardly the ONLY one missing so why this was so important is beyond me. As I asked in the other post in this series with questions, IF this was urgent and important why did they not issue an APB on him like they did for Charles Givens?
Finally, how could Mr. Campbell verify a photograph when he has ADMITTED that he NEVER SAW LHO at any time? Does this make any sense to you? It is just another clear example of the framing of LHO that went on.
By the way, Mr. Cambell would say in a signed statement the following after hearing shots fired:
Quote on
I definitely did not see Lee Harvey Oswald at that time and in fact had no occasion to look back at the Texas School Book Depository building as I THOUGHT THE SHOTS HAD COME FROM THE WEST.
I have had the occasion to view photographs of Lee Harvey Oswald and to the best of my recollection NEVER SAW HIM while he was employed by the Texas School Book Depository. (Ibid.) (emphasis added)
Quote off
So NOT only did he never see LHO, thus, making him viewing photos of him useless, but he said he thought the shots came from the WEST (i.e. GK area)!
3) How could President John F. Kennedy (JFK) have been shot with a 6.5mm COPPER bullet as claimed by the Warren Commission (WC) and have his shirt and tie show NO signs of copper on them?
IT is true! Go to Gallagher exhibit 1 and see this:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0011b.gif
…During the course of the spectrographic examinations previously conducted on the fabric surrounding the hole in the front of the shirt, including the tie, NO COPPER WAS FOUND in excess of that present elsewhere in undamaged areas of the shirt and tie. Therefore, NO COPPER WAS FOUND WHICH COULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO PROJECTILE FRAGMENTS. (Gallagher Exhibit 1, p. 2)
www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/html/WH_Vol20_0011b.htm
Quote off
Isn’t this amazing? This alone sinks TWO CLAIMS made by the WC! Firstly, that the bullet that hit JFK in the back from the TSBD left his throat, and secondly, that 6.5mm COPPER ammo was used!
This document also leads us to the next question.
4) Was the fact that LHO tested positive for nitrates on his hand an indication that he fired a pistol that day?
NO, according to the same exhibit.
Simply go back one page and read about how certain items found in the warehouse contain barium (printing ink, glass, paint, paper, etc.…). Ditto antimony (matches, paints and lacquers, etc.). Finally, what items contain BOTH? Gallagher said that printed paper and cloth, paint, storage batteries, rubber and matches, pyrotechnics and other items contain both. Obviously, the reason LHO’s hands turned positive was due to what he was touching all morning vs. him firing a pistol.
No wonder he was reluctantly called as the LAST WITNESS by the WC, huh?
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0011a.gif
5) Why was LHO never presented with the alleged murder weapon?
This is a great question that I read from Walt Brown. The Dallas Police Department (DPD) never presented LHO with the alleged murder weapon for him to confirm or deny. Why not? All they allegedly did was show him a picture (one of the BYP’s) of a rifle. Is this normal procedure? I don’t think so.
As Walt Brown asked, where they holding him for shooting a PICTURE of JFK? It went beyond the rifle too, they never presented him with any of the so-called evidence. Why NOT?
6)IF LHO used A. Hidell as an alias as the DPD and WC claimed, why was this NOT listed on the day he was arrested?
If you look at David Johnston Exhibit 1, page 313, you will see at the top of the first page this:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0167a.gif
Lee Harvey Oswald, White male 24
(DOB 10-18-39 something I can’t read Orleans, State of Louisiana)
Father: Robert E. Oswald, deceased
Mother: Maruguerite Claverie
ALIAS: O.H. LEE 1026 N. Beckly Ave. Dallas, Texas (David Johnston Exhibit 1, p. 313)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/html/WH_Vol20_0167a.htm
Quote off
There is NO mention of Alex Hidell at all! In fact, this alias would NOT be tied to LHO until the NEXT day when the alleged rifle order from Klein’s was supposedly traced by the FBI. The DPD made NO mention of this alias all through the day of the assassination.
IF the selective service card allegedly showing he used this alias was found on 11/22/63, why did Sgt. Hill and others NOT think he was A. Hidell instead of LHO? On page 805 of CE 2160 you will the following exchange:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/pages/WH_Vol24_0412a.gif
Q. What was his name on the billfold?
Hill. What was his name on the billfold?
Q. On the billfold.
Hill. Lee H. Oswald. O-S-W-A-L-D. (CE 2160, p. 805)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0412a.htm
Quote off
See? IF they had found the A. Hidell card on 11/22/63 surely it would have been mentioned. Speaking of billfolds, why was NO billfold listed on LHO’s possessions sheet? Go to CE 1148 to see for yourselves.
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pages/WH_Vol22_0104b.gif
What happened to it?
The above quote from Johnston Exhibit 1 was from page 313 of the document, but if you go to page 314 you will see the following:
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0167b.jpg
…All properties found from the room of O.H. Lee (Lee Harvey Oswald) were taken to Homicide Bureau, Dallas Police Dept.
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0104b.htm
Quote off
Again, we see NO mention of A. Hidell. This document is a goldmine of information as it is a synopsis of events that occurred from 11/22/63 to 11/24/63. On page 315 it mentions under the time of 1:35 a.m. that LHO was again advised of his Constitutional rights, but little good that did him as he went nearly 48 hours with NO lawyer.
7) Why was the camera allegedly owned by LHO NOT turned over to the DPD until February 1964?
Wasn’t this a vital piece of evidence as it allegedly took the alleged Backyard pictures (BYPs) showing a figure in black (allegedly LHO) holding the alleged assassination rifle and alleged murder weapon of JDT? I think so. Of course we have the issue of a MINOX camera being found by the DPD on 11/23/63 and it becoming a “light meter” once in FBI custody too, but let’s look at the testimony regarding this exchange in 1964.
Mr. Liebeler. When the Dallas police and other authorities came out to your house, they eventually took all of Oswald's personal effects, did they not?
Mrs. Paine. No; they did not.
Mr. Liebeler. Did you have anything left in your house that belonged to Oswald?
Mrs. Paine. No; they were eventually taken by Robert Oswald in company with John Thorne and Jim Martin. That was probably the first weekend in December, or at least 2 weeks after the assassination--more likely 3.
Mr. Liebeler. Do you recall what was among these things that Robert Oswald and Mr. Martin took?
Mrs. Paine. They took the clothes from the closet, boxes and things that I ,did not look into. I have heard from the police that it also included an old camera which they had to chase later and went up to Robert Oswald's to find it.
Why was this camera allowed to sit and NOT be confiscated during the search on 11/23/63? Was it because it was NOT the camera they found in the first place and had NO connection to anything? There is no other reason for it being allowed to be missing until Robert Oswald turned it in the next year.
8) Who was the RIGHT suspect?
I don’t know, but it sounds like the DPD had one picked out. Go to CE 705, page 379 and read this:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0203a.gif
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0203a.gif
44 - wrong boy.
Ok 44. received
All units at Marsaillis & Jefferson disregard. THIS IS WRONG SUSPECT. 1:40 PM. (CE 705, p. 379)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0203a.htm
Quote off
As I showed in another post in this series the same kind of remark (“not sure if it is him or not”) was made by local police in Ft. Worth, Texas (see SS Agent Roger Warner and Donald Wayne House). These kind of remarks lead one to believe they knew EXACTLY who they were supposed to arrest.
Later on the same page as above you will see this:
44 – What you got at the Texas Theater?
35 – They got a suspect hiding in the balcony at the Texas Theater on West Jefferson. I’ll be out.
44 – I’ll be enroute.
Quote off
First of all, does NOT paying for a ticket (the supposed offense LHO committed) constitute being called a SUSPECT in the murder of a police officer? Second of all, LHO was NEVER in the balcony of the TT per the WC, so who was this person?
9) Who were the people armed at the Braniff building at Love Field?
In the same document, CE-705, you will see this on page 432:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0229b.gif
32 – We are unable to locate this (unable to read) at Love Field. Give us that call on 3101.
Disp – 10-4, Gate 11 – 31 at the location, 3:35.
32 – 32, I am a 2-man.
Disp – I know it. I want both of you there.
32 – 10-4.
Disp – 31 & 32, for your information, reported to be SEVERAL PERSONS ARMED, 3:36.
32 – 10-4.
31 – 10-4.
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0229b.htm
Quote off
Who were these people? We don’t know as no follow-up seems to have been done for us to find out. Does anyone know about this? Was this possibly a team set-up to shoot JFK at Love Field? I would love to know more about this if anyone has any information on it.
10)Why would LHO rent a P.O. Box in his OWN name, and then use an alias to have mail sent there?
Does this make any sense to anyone outside the small group of WC defenders? I mean, isn’t the purpose of an ALIAS is to avoid using or showing YOUR REAL NAME? I would think so, but in this case they want us to believe LHO ordered the rifle and pistol under an alleged alias, but had it sent to his P.O. Box with his real name attached to it!
Like most of this case, it simply makes NO sense and only shows us LHO was setup as he claimed.
We again see evidence that disputes the claims of the WC, thus, their conclusion is sunk again.
3.bp.blogspot.com/_I4lZU0BrRsg/TPXTI3y8v1I/AAAAAAAAAE4/Hot_KJ7VKdY/s1600/warren.jpg
I have done 15 questions in an earlier post in this series and I will now do 10 more. NO answer can be given that does NOT point to a conspiracy.
*********************************
1) Why are John Connally’s (JBC) X-rays in the twenty-six volumes, but John F. Kennedy’s (JFK) are NOT?
If one goes to CE 691-696,
www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0187b.jpg
…you will see them, but you will NOT find any X-rays for JFK in the twenty-six volumes. Why NOT? Wasn’t our president worthy of X-rays? Of course, he was, but they were NOT included in the evidence. Why NOT?
2) Why did O.V. Campbell say Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was missing from the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) when he admitted to NEVER SEEING HIM to know what he looked like?
It is true. Go to CE 1435 and read the following:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pages/WH_Vol22_0438a.gif
…Inside he was told shortly thereafter by the warehouse superintendent, Mr. Truly, that all the employees of the company had been rounded up and one employee, Lee Harvey Oswald was missing.
Mr. Campbell observed a photograph Lee Harvey Oswald, bearing New Orleans, Louisiana No. 112 723, and stated that he is sure this is a photograph of the employee named above, but added that he not personally acquainted with him and HAS NEVER SEEN HIM. He advised that he has always given Mr. Truly the responsibility of hiring employees for the warehouse. (CE 1435, p. 845) (emphasis mine)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0438a.htm
Quote off
First of all, the claim that “employees were rounded up” is simply NOT true as I have shown in an earlier post in this series. NO roll call ever took place. Secondly, LHO was hardly the ONLY one missing so why this was so important is beyond me. As I asked in the other post in this series with questions, IF this was urgent and important why did they not issue an APB on him like they did for Charles Givens?
Finally, how could Mr. Campbell verify a photograph when he has ADMITTED that he NEVER SAW LHO at any time? Does this make any sense to you? It is just another clear example of the framing of LHO that went on.
By the way, Mr. Cambell would say in a signed statement the following after hearing shots fired:
Quote on
I definitely did not see Lee Harvey Oswald at that time and in fact had no occasion to look back at the Texas School Book Depository building as I THOUGHT THE SHOTS HAD COME FROM THE WEST.
I have had the occasion to view photographs of Lee Harvey Oswald and to the best of my recollection NEVER SAW HIM while he was employed by the Texas School Book Depository. (Ibid.) (emphasis added)
Quote off
So NOT only did he never see LHO, thus, making him viewing photos of him useless, but he said he thought the shots came from the WEST (i.e. GK area)!
3) How could President John F. Kennedy (JFK) have been shot with a 6.5mm COPPER bullet as claimed by the Warren Commission (WC) and have his shirt and tie show NO signs of copper on them?
IT is true! Go to Gallagher exhibit 1 and see this:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0011b.gif
…During the course of the spectrographic examinations previously conducted on the fabric surrounding the hole in the front of the shirt, including the tie, NO COPPER WAS FOUND in excess of that present elsewhere in undamaged areas of the shirt and tie. Therefore, NO COPPER WAS FOUND WHICH COULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO PROJECTILE FRAGMENTS. (Gallagher Exhibit 1, p. 2)
www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/html/WH_Vol20_0011b.htm
Quote off
Isn’t this amazing? This alone sinks TWO CLAIMS made by the WC! Firstly, that the bullet that hit JFK in the back from the TSBD left his throat, and secondly, that 6.5mm COPPER ammo was used!
This document also leads us to the next question.
4) Was the fact that LHO tested positive for nitrates on his hand an indication that he fired a pistol that day?
NO, according to the same exhibit.
Simply go back one page and read about how certain items found in the warehouse contain barium (printing ink, glass, paint, paper, etc.…). Ditto antimony (matches, paints and lacquers, etc.). Finally, what items contain BOTH? Gallagher said that printed paper and cloth, paint, storage batteries, rubber and matches, pyrotechnics and other items contain both. Obviously, the reason LHO’s hands turned positive was due to what he was touching all morning vs. him firing a pistol.
No wonder he was reluctantly called as the LAST WITNESS by the WC, huh?
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0011a.gif
5) Why was LHO never presented with the alleged murder weapon?
This is a great question that I read from Walt Brown. The Dallas Police Department (DPD) never presented LHO with the alleged murder weapon for him to confirm or deny. Why not? All they allegedly did was show him a picture (one of the BYP’s) of a rifle. Is this normal procedure? I don’t think so.
As Walt Brown asked, where they holding him for shooting a PICTURE of JFK? It went beyond the rifle too, they never presented him with any of the so-called evidence. Why NOT?
6)IF LHO used A. Hidell as an alias as the DPD and WC claimed, why was this NOT listed on the day he was arrested?
If you look at David Johnston Exhibit 1, page 313, you will see at the top of the first page this:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0167a.gif
Lee Harvey Oswald, White male 24
(DOB 10-18-39 something I can’t read Orleans, State of Louisiana)
Father: Robert E. Oswald, deceased
Mother: Maruguerite Claverie
ALIAS: O.H. LEE 1026 N. Beckly Ave. Dallas, Texas (David Johnston Exhibit 1, p. 313)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/html/WH_Vol20_0167a.htm
Quote off
There is NO mention of Alex Hidell at all! In fact, this alias would NOT be tied to LHO until the NEXT day when the alleged rifle order from Klein’s was supposedly traced by the FBI. The DPD made NO mention of this alias all through the day of the assassination.
IF the selective service card allegedly showing he used this alias was found on 11/22/63, why did Sgt. Hill and others NOT think he was A. Hidell instead of LHO? On page 805 of CE 2160 you will the following exchange:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/pages/WH_Vol24_0412a.gif
Q. What was his name on the billfold?
Hill. What was his name on the billfold?
Q. On the billfold.
Hill. Lee H. Oswald. O-S-W-A-L-D. (CE 2160, p. 805)
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0412a.htm
Quote off
See? IF they had found the A. Hidell card on 11/22/63 surely it would have been mentioned. Speaking of billfolds, why was NO billfold listed on LHO’s possessions sheet? Go to CE 1148 to see for yourselves.
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pages/WH_Vol22_0104b.gif
What happened to it?
The above quote from Johnston Exhibit 1 was from page 313 of the document, but if you go to page 314 you will see the following:
Quote on
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh20/pages/WH_Vol20_0167b.jpg
…All properties found from the room of O.H. Lee (Lee Harvey Oswald) were taken to Homicide Bureau, Dallas Police Dept.
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0104b.htm
Quote off
Again, we see NO mention of A. Hidell. This document is a goldmine of information as it is a synopsis of events that occurred from 11/22/63 to 11/24/63. On page 315 it mentions under the time of 1:35 a.m. that LHO was again advised of his Constitutional rights, but little good that did him as he went nearly 48 hours with NO lawyer.
7) Why was the camera allegedly owned by LHO NOT turned over to the DPD until February 1964?
Wasn’t this a vital piece of evidence as it allegedly took the alleged Backyard pictures (BYPs) showing a figure in black (allegedly LHO) holding the alleged assassination rifle and alleged murder weapon of JDT? I think so. Of course we have the issue of a MINOX camera being found by the DPD on 11/23/63 and it becoming a “light meter” once in FBI custody too, but let’s look at the testimony regarding this exchange in 1964.
Mr. Liebeler. When the Dallas police and other authorities came out to your house, they eventually took all of Oswald's personal effects, did they not?
Mrs. Paine. No; they did not.
Mr. Liebeler. Did you have anything left in your house that belonged to Oswald?
Mrs. Paine. No; they were eventually taken by Robert Oswald in company with John Thorne and Jim Martin. That was probably the first weekend in December, or at least 2 weeks after the assassination--more likely 3.
Mr. Liebeler. Do you recall what was among these things that Robert Oswald and Mr. Martin took?
Mrs. Paine. They took the clothes from the closet, boxes and things that I ,did not look into. I have heard from the police that it also included an old camera which they had to chase later and went up to Robert Oswald's to find it.
Why was this camera allowed to sit and NOT be confiscated during the search on 11/23/63? Was it because it was NOT the camera they found in the first place and had NO connection to anything? There is no other reason for it being allowed to be missing until Robert Oswald turned it in the next year.
8) Who was the RIGHT suspect?
I don’t know, but it sounds like the DPD had one picked out. Go to CE 705, page 379 and read this:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0203a.gif
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0203a.gif
44 - wrong boy.
Ok 44. received
All units at Marsaillis & Jefferson disregard. THIS IS WRONG SUSPECT. 1:40 PM. (CE 705, p. 379)
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0203a.htm
Quote off
As I showed in another post in this series the same kind of remark (“not sure if it is him or not”) was made by local police in Ft. Worth, Texas (see SS Agent Roger Warner and Donald Wayne House). These kind of remarks lead one to believe they knew EXACTLY who they were supposed to arrest.
Later on the same page as above you will see this:
44 – What you got at the Texas Theater?
35 – They got a suspect hiding in the balcony at the Texas Theater on West Jefferson. I’ll be out.
44 – I’ll be enroute.
Quote off
First of all, does NOT paying for a ticket (the supposed offense LHO committed) constitute being called a SUSPECT in the murder of a police officer? Second of all, LHO was NEVER in the balcony of the TT per the WC, so who was this person?
9) Who were the people armed at the Braniff building at Love Field?
In the same document, CE-705, you will see this on page 432:
Quote on
historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pages/WH_Vol17_0229b.gif
32 – We are unable to locate this (unable to read) at Love Field. Give us that call on 3101.
Disp – 10-4, Gate 11 – 31 at the location, 3:35.
32 – 32, I am a 2-man.
Disp – I know it. I want both of you there.
32 – 10-4.
Disp – 31 & 32, for your information, reported to be SEVERAL PERSONS ARMED, 3:36.
32 – 10-4.
31 – 10-4.
www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0229b.htm
Quote off
Who were these people? We don’t know as no follow-up seems to have been done for us to find out. Does anyone know about this? Was this possibly a team set-up to shoot JFK at Love Field? I would love to know more about this if anyone has any information on it.
10)Why would LHO rent a P.O. Box in his OWN name, and then use an alias to have mail sent there?
Does this make any sense to anyone outside the small group of WC defenders? I mean, isn’t the purpose of an ALIAS is to avoid using or showing YOUR REAL NAME? I would think so, but in this case they want us to believe LHO ordered the rifle and pistol under an alleged alias, but had it sent to his P.O. Box with his real name attached to it!
Like most of this case, it simply makes NO sense and only shows us LHO was setup as he claimed.
We again see evidence that disputes the claims of the WC, thus, their conclusion is sunk again.