Post by Rob Caprio on Aug 8, 2019 20:55:38 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
***Note – I mimicked Ben Holmes' appeal to “Lurkers" as he used this refrain for years.***
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben Holmes will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other peoples' words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
******************************************
Ben made this false accusation against me:
“Just as Curt does, you don't view this from the perspective of evidence, you view it from the perspective of "Evil Government". “ (Ben Holmes – 7/1/09)
When asked to provide my WORDS showing I felt this way, he admitted he couldn't. This shows that he just made it up. LNers always put words into other peoples' mouths. Many times they argue against the words that they put into your mouth.
When one tries to discuss the evidence of major events with Ben he refuses and calls that stuff "astrology!"
Thus, we see TWO LIES here by Ben. The first one is obvious as he made an accusation he KNEW he could NOT support with my own words but he made it anyway. He is telling a falsehood. LNers like to say those that question the official version of major events just "hate" the government. Again, the goal is to make people back off from questioning the official narrative even if the evidence doesn't support it. I never mentioned the government in my statement either. (See above.)
Secondly, he is the ONE that refuses to even look at the evidence in the 9/11 case as that is all "astrology" to him, so he lied when he claimed I do NOT look at it from the "perspective of evidence" as he is the ONE that does this, NOT me. Only a LNer would equate evidence with “astrology.”
Will he retract his lies?
***Note – I mimicked Ben Holmes' appeal to “Lurkers" as he used this refrain for years.***
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben Holmes will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other peoples' words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
******************************************
Ben made this false accusation against me:
“Just as Curt does, you don't view this from the perspective of evidence, you view it from the perspective of "Evil Government". “ (Ben Holmes – 7/1/09)
When asked to provide my WORDS showing I felt this way, he admitted he couldn't. This shows that he just made it up. LNers always put words into other peoples' mouths. Many times they argue against the words that they put into your mouth.
When one tries to discuss the evidence of major events with Ben he refuses and calls that stuff "astrology!"
Thus, we see TWO LIES here by Ben. The first one is obvious as he made an accusation he KNEW he could NOT support with my own words but he made it anyway. He is telling a falsehood. LNers like to say those that question the official version of major events just "hate" the government. Again, the goal is to make people back off from questioning the official narrative even if the evidence doesn't support it. I never mentioned the government in my statement either. (See above.)
Secondly, he is the ONE that refuses to even look at the evidence in the 9/11 case as that is all "astrology" to him, so he lied when he claimed I do NOT look at it from the "perspective of evidence" as he is the ONE that does this, NOT me. Only a LNer would equate evidence with “astrology.”
Will he retract his lies?