Post by Rob Caprio on Sept 28, 2019 21:49:16 GMT -5
All portions ©️ Robert Caprio 2006-2024
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other people’s words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
The lies keep rolling in folks! I am reading a response to a post I made yesterday about Ben's claim of Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) knowing Silvia Duran.
Here is what I listed on my "Unsupported Claims of Ben Holmes" list.
"Ben never proved his claim that LHO knew Silvia Duran." (Robert)
Ben initially said "Never said this" but I did a post about this yesterday and he responded to the quotes I gave showing that he DID say this!
In this post yesterday I wrote this.
"Ben is saying LHO "knew" Silvia Duran because her name was in his personal diary/notebook allegedly." (Robert)
"More precisely, I'm saying that THE EVIDENCE shows that Oswald knew Silvia Duran, (or even more precisely, knew her name)
What I *NEVER* said is what you asserted." (Ben Holmes -- 7/31/09)
He gave us "evidence" that shows LHO "knew" Silvia Duran and he asserted the following about this "evidence"!
“The Silvia Duran notation, the Oswald letter to the Russian embassy, *both* support "the claim being made".
I'm left with the evidence, Robsie. I'm left with citations...You have neither.” (Ben Holmes)
He is bragging he is "left with the evidence and citations" and I'm left with NOTHING! Now he is trying to lie his way out of his lie by DISTANCING himself from this evidence he was thumping his chest over! LOL!!
He said this too!
”You're *STILL* going to have to explain the Silvia Duran entry in Oswald's notebook.” (Ben Holmes – 1/28/09)
He is putting forth this evidence as his own because I have to "explain it" as if it was proven already! NOW he is RUNNING from this "evidence" as fast as he can!
Here he is EMPHATIC about this "evidence", yet NOW he is DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM IT!
“Of course you do, Rob. You claim that there's no proof that Oswald went to Mexico, and indeed, there *IS* evidence. Evidence that you will continue to duck...much like LNT'ers always duck the evidence.
Your theory *NEEDS* to explain this evidence... otherwise, you don't have a theory, you have a faith. “ (Ben Holmes – 1/28/09)
He even claims I am DUCKING this "evidence" because it is so powerful and irrefutable I guess. NOW he is claiming I am claiming that LHO did NOT know Silvia Duran despite her name allegedly in his personal diary/notebook.
Then he says to me "If you don't put words into my mouth all will be okay" as IF anyone could put this many variations into his mouth! Ben is a liar, and he lies about his lies and his OWN WORDS!
Let's end with this gem!
“There is NO proof beyond some very shaky testimony by Duran who admitted to having an affair with the man in question.” (Robert)
“And strangely enough, Silvia Duran's name appears in Oswald's notebook.
Something I've mentioned before, and you've run away from...For someone making the claim that Oswald was never in Mexico - that's going to be a tough one to explain.” (Ben Holmes – 1/27/09)
NOW, why would her name be in his personal diary/notebook if he did NOT know of her or know her?
Ben is NOW claiming he never said this. LOL!!!
Notice To Lurkers:
Ben will deny these very obvious lies by claiming he has given evidence already (a favorite trick of the LNer clan) or that he has quoted me saying something, but do NOT fall for it. Demand him to provide this evidence to you. Demand that he provides my quote IN context as he has a habit of EDITING other people’s words and ignoring clarifications even when they are made BEFORE he responded.
Ben will resort to insults and false accusations like all LNers do so take note of how often he does this.
*******************************************************************
Let's start to add in Ben's OWN notice as he does EXACTLY what he warns you folks LNers will do!
“Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.” (Ben Holmes’s Refrain on his “series” posts.)
******************************************************************
The lies keep rolling in folks! I am reading a response to a post I made yesterday about Ben's claim of Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) knowing Silvia Duran.
Here is what I listed on my "Unsupported Claims of Ben Holmes" list.
"Ben never proved his claim that LHO knew Silvia Duran." (Robert)
Ben initially said "Never said this" but I did a post about this yesterday and he responded to the quotes I gave showing that he DID say this!
In this post yesterday I wrote this.
"Ben is saying LHO "knew" Silvia Duran because her name was in his personal diary/notebook allegedly." (Robert)
"More precisely, I'm saying that THE EVIDENCE shows that Oswald knew Silvia Duran, (or even more precisely, knew her name)
What I *NEVER* said is what you asserted." (Ben Holmes -- 7/31/09)
He gave us "evidence" that shows LHO "knew" Silvia Duran and he asserted the following about this "evidence"!
“The Silvia Duran notation, the Oswald letter to the Russian embassy, *both* support "the claim being made".
I'm left with the evidence, Robsie. I'm left with citations...You have neither.” (Ben Holmes)
He is bragging he is "left with the evidence and citations" and I'm left with NOTHING! Now he is trying to lie his way out of his lie by DISTANCING himself from this evidence he was thumping his chest over! LOL!!
He said this too!
”You're *STILL* going to have to explain the Silvia Duran entry in Oswald's notebook.” (Ben Holmes – 1/28/09)
He is putting forth this evidence as his own because I have to "explain it" as if it was proven already! NOW he is RUNNING from this "evidence" as fast as he can!
Here he is EMPHATIC about this "evidence", yet NOW he is DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM IT!
“Of course you do, Rob. You claim that there's no proof that Oswald went to Mexico, and indeed, there *IS* evidence. Evidence that you will continue to duck...much like LNT'ers always duck the evidence.
Your theory *NEEDS* to explain this evidence... otherwise, you don't have a theory, you have a faith. “ (Ben Holmes – 1/28/09)
He even claims I am DUCKING this "evidence" because it is so powerful and irrefutable I guess. NOW he is claiming I am claiming that LHO did NOT know Silvia Duran despite her name allegedly in his personal diary/notebook.
Then he says to me "If you don't put words into my mouth all will be okay" as IF anyone could put this many variations into his mouth! Ben is a liar, and he lies about his lies and his OWN WORDS!
Let's end with this gem!
“There is NO proof beyond some very shaky testimony by Duran who admitted to having an affair with the man in question.” (Robert)
“And strangely enough, Silvia Duran's name appears in Oswald's notebook.
Something I've mentioned before, and you've run away from...For someone making the claim that Oswald was never in Mexico - that's going to be a tough one to explain.” (Ben Holmes – 1/27/09)
NOW, why would her name be in his personal diary/notebook if he did NOT know of her or know her?
Ben is NOW claiming he never said this. LOL!!!